Perhaps he wore the clothes to give his fans something interesting to talk about and debate in the forums. If that was the purpose, he's sure achieved his goal!
Instead of the usual
"drool, swoon, OMG Gorgeous!!!" comments (which Jake got as always - for his immaculately dressed appearance in Toronto) we're discussing the purpose of clothes and dress code, and the message sent through conforming / deliberately not conforming. Heath knows how to make it interesting and to engage brain cells other than those drool&swoon centers (not that those aren't engaged too!)
This doesn't make any sense apart from following society's rules. But why does nobody question whether the rules themselves make sense?
Well, people do question those rules, many times....and in many ways?
But there's a strong wish in most of us to conform to the expected and the norm.
More than that, though - there's the whole act of balancing making a statement and challenging the accepted norm with upsetting, hurting and/or offending people. You used the example earlier of mentioning that people could wear whatever they wanted to your wedding, you'd not care. But if *you* went to the wedding of people you knew *would* care about superficial appearances; - would you dress up in any old battered set of T-shirt and throusers regardless? Knowing you'd offend and even hurt them, mar their "perfect day" the way they perceive that term? I guess not? There's always the question of whether and when the statement is worth making, - if the cost of making it is not too high.
Using that as an analogy to Heath's appearance s far from perfect, of course - the people being offended at the awards gala are likely powerful stuffy film execs with much less, if any, personal investment than any bride and groom (and far more calculated financial investment).
Actually, the more I think of it, the more I like his wackyness, if for no other reason it completey serves as a contrast to everyone else and to point out how utterly stuffy all these awards ceremonies are. How everyone shows up to pat each other on the back (or stab each other same place) and it's all about money and less about creativity and film as an art..... people mainly posturing with blazing smiles and appearances that it took stylists and make-up consultants the whole day to complete - enjoying their fame and fortune and congratulating themselves on their success (at least that's the impression I'm firmly left with, especially after watching Oscar night).
No idea if that was what Heath was trying to make a statement about, but if it was I (once more) can't help applauding his guts - even if it was impolite. Perhaps it was playing a major role in the big-buck commercially tuned Batman movie that made him do it, - who knows what kind of politicking and money-discussions go on behind the sets of that kind of mega blockbuster, - probably more than enough to make anyone want to act out a little bit against the corporate
suits tuxes.
I'm just thinking aloud, here.
Maybe we should officially announce September, 10th the "Weird Socks Day".
I second that.