The World Beyond BetterMost > The Culture Tent
In the New Yorker...
Jeff Wrangler:
--- Quote from: serious crayons on February 13, 2015, 09:54:40 am ---My [math] skills have atrophied to about a fifth-grade level.
--- End quote ---
Unless you're working in a job that demands sophisticated math, that's probably about all you need. I mean, how often in our daily lives do we have to find the square root of anything? (And what was the purpose of that, anyway?) :laugh: Plus, we now have calculators and computers, which we didn't have when you and I were in fifth grade. Calculators only started to come in when you and I were in high school.
In a similar vein, I heard something recently about new attempts to make kids understand mathematical concepts, instead of just learn how to add, subtract, etc. I thought to myself, "OMG, that sound an awful lot like the 'new math' that was in vogue when I was in elementary school: 'Subtraction is the additive inverse,' shit like that taught to first graders." WTF? It was a disaster in 1964-65; I can't see it being an better now.
--- Quote from: serious crayons on February 13, 2015, 09:54:40 am ---Which means that by the time I tried it, it had been illegal for less than a decade. ::)
--- End quote ---
The other thing I came away with from that article is, If LSD can successfully treat anxiety in cancer patients and the terminally ill, why can't they titrate the dosage and use it to help people who "just" have Generalized Anxiety Disorder? If I had a bad case of GAD, would I be willing to treat it with one or an occasional session of LSD with a therapist instead of having to take medication every day? I sure would!
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Jeff Wrangler on February 13, 2015, 10:50:36 am ---Unless you're working in a job that demands sophisticated math, that's probably about all you need. I mean, how often in our daily lives do we have to find the square root of anything? (And what was the purpose of that, anyway?) :laugh: Plus, we now have calculators and computers, which we didn't have when you and I were in fifth grade. Calculators only started to come in when you and I were in high school.
--- End quote ---
I know. Occasionally the mathematical demands of my journalism job exceed my abilities. I have to stop and think about how to calculate percentages and things like that.
But I have taken the GRE twice; the first time I studied the math, relearned how to do quadratic equations, and got an actually respectable score (that is, my percentage among people taking the GREs, which includes everyone from math majors to, well, people planning to go for an MFA in writing) and the second time I didn't study at all and my score was ... I guess you could call it respectable by creative-writing program standards.
--- Quote ---In a similar vein, I heard something recently about new attempts to make kids understand mathematical concepts, instead of just learn how to add, subtract, etc. I thought to myself, "OMG, that sound an awful lot like the 'new math' that was in vogue when I was in elementary school: 'Subtraction is the additive inverse,' shit like that taught to first graders." WTF? It was a disaster in 1964-65; I can't see it being an better now.
--- End quote ---
I never really understand what "new math" was, because it was the only math I'd ever known.
--- Quote ---The other thing I came away with from that article is, If LSD can successfully treat anxiety in cancer patients and the terminally ill, why can't they titrate the dosage and use it to help people who "just" have Generalized Anxiety Disorder? If I had a bad case of GAD, would I be willing to treat it with one or an occasional session of LSD with a therapist instead of having to take medication every day? I sure would!
--- End quote ---
Having experienced both, I would say it would have to be a very low dose.
I haven't read the article yet but the premise surprises me; I would think LSD would take the minds of terminally ill people into some unsettling places.
Jeff Wrangler:
--- Quote from: serious crayons on February 13, 2015, 11:11:08 am ---I never really understand what "new math" was, because it was the only math I'd ever known.
--- End quote ---
That was the thing. It was supposed to make kids understand why the different math functions worked--kids who didn't yet know how to do the basic math functions.
I will never forget being in grade school, and having trouble with and getting upset over my math homework, and getting grief from my dad because I couldn't do math in my head, had to do all sorts of stuff on paper like cross off numbers and "carry" numbers--but that was how I was being taught. And he blamed me for it! :(
--- Quote ---Having experienced both, I would say it would have to be a very low dose.
I haven't read the article yet but the premise surprises me; I would think LSD would take the minds of terminally ill people into some unsettling places.
--- End quote ---
It's a very interesting article. I don't want to give too much away, but your concern is exactly why it's done with a therapist present. I don't recall that they go into the amount of the drug taken by the patient.
Front-Ranger:
--- Quote from: serious crayons on February 13, 2015, 09:54:40 am ---I've started reading the one about the guy who discovered some amazing mathematical proof. It may be too soon to tell, but so far it's interesting. Math itself makes my eyes glaze over -- I was once actually good at it but I never particularly liked it, stopped taking it in high school, and now my skills have atrophied to about a fifth-grade level -- but as in the play/movie "Proof," the human drama surrounding amazing mathematical feats can be interesting.
One thing I like about this is the guy was middle-aged and seemingly washed up -- he couldn't get a job in academia, was working in a Subway! -- when things turned around for him.
--- End quote ---
I loved that story too. The vulnerability of people whose minds are focused on such abstract things that they can't function in the day-to-day world very well. I like the way the story ended...completely in character.
Jeff Wrangler:
At lunch today I finished Elizabeth Kolbert's story about "the impossibility of justice for the Holocaust" (Feb. 16) and read Nathan Heller on a book about Scandinavia (so it appears Donald Duck is to the Swedes what Jerry Lewis is to the French).
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version