The World Beyond BetterMost > The Culture Tent
In the New Yorker...
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Jeff Wrangler on November 13, 2019, 10:04:22 am ---It seemed to me that the length was pretty typical for The New Yorker. I can see where it might be too long for you because you've already read profiles of him. I had not; I only knew the name.
--- End quote ---
Neither had I. I knew nothing about him except what he's like as an actor. But I read a couple of pages into it and realized I was just reading a profile of some fairly ordinary guy from Indiana who became an actor. It was about the same length as a typical New Yorker story, which was the problem.
--- Quote ---My taste for old Westerns and so forth really has nothing to do with whether or not I might have liked Girls. Good or not, what possible interest could a show that centers on young, generation-whatever women living in NYC have for me? No relevance whatsoever. (Neither did a show like Queer as Folk, about the travails of a bunch of young gay guys.) Before you ask, for me, anyway, relevance doesn't enter into action shows or procedurals. They're escapism for me. Urban drama is not.
--- End quote ---
Oh, I don't know. I don't limit my TV watching to shows in which the characters match my demographics. The show wasn't just about girls, it was about boys, too. Admittedly the girls were the main drivers (haha) of the plot. But the only thing I have in common with them that you don't is that I'm female. Oh, and I lived in NYC for a year. Anyway, I watch shows based on whether they're entertaining or interesting. A show about a middle-class, 60+-year-old woman in Minnesota had better be pretty damn entertaining. :laugh: (Though Fargo came close, and it was entertaining.)
I loved the series Justified. Most of its main characters were men, most at least 10 years younger than me. It's set in Harlan County, KY, where I've never been. It's about law enforcement officers and small-time criminals, neither of which I've ever been. And yet ...
Jeff Wrangler:
--- Quote from: serious crayons on November 13, 2019, 10:36:28 am ---Neither had I. I knew nothing about him except what he's like as an actor. But I read a couple of pages into it and realized I was just reading a profile of some fairly ordinary guy from Indiana who became an actor. It was about the same length as a typical New Yorker story, which was the problem.
--- End quote ---
That's exactly why I liked it and read the whole thing.
--- Quote ---Oh, I don't know. I don't limit my TV watching to shows in which the characters match my demographics. The show wasn't just about girls, it was about boys, too. Admittedly the girls were the main drivers (haha) of the plot.
--- End quote ---
As far as girls driving the plot, that was kind of my point, however poorly expressed. (I also never watched Sex in the City ;D you could say for more or less the same reason.)
--- Quote ---I loved the series Justified. Most of its main characters were men, most at least 10 years younger than me. It's set in Harlan County, KY, where I've never been. It's about law enforcement officers and small-time criminals, neither of which I've ever been. And yet ...
--- End quote ---
That looked interesting to me, but there was certainly a reason I didn't/couldn't watch it. Possibly I didn't/don't get the channel/network it aired on. Or I may have watched something else in the same time slot.
And, please, let's not go back to the recording thing again. As I've said before, many times, there are so many choices these days that there is always something to watch "live" instead of something recorded. But there is also the fact that I'm very brand loyal, otherwise, why have I been watching N.C.I.S. and Law & Order: Special Victims Unit for well over a decade? If I like a show, I tend to stick with it until the end, or until I feel it really goes off the rails.
(I guess I was brought up to be brand loyal. A few weeks ago I was really pissed off that I had to buy Endust because the supermarket seems not to carry Lemon Pledge, my mother's preferred dusting product. ;D )
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Jeff Wrangler on November 13, 2019, 12:12:11 pm ---That's exactly why I liked it and read the whole thing.
--- End quote ---
Ha! :laugh: I guess we're just opposites in that way.
--- Quote ---As far as girls driving the plot, that was kind of my point, however poorly expressed. (I also never watched Sex in the City ;D you could say for more or less the same reason.)
--- End quote ---
I understood your point. Mine was that if I let gender, sexual orientation, age and location determine my viewing choices I'd never turn the TV on.
I never watched SitC because a) at the time I didn't have HBO and b) it didn't sound that interesting. Even though the characters roughly matched me, demographically.
Girls was more interesting. I guess that's at least part of why they let Lena Dunham make an indie feature film when she was like 23.
When I finally did get HBO, the show I watched was The Sopranos. I put it off for a long time, but once I started watching I was hooked and consumed an episode almost every night through five or six seasons or however many. I liked it a lot, even though I don't live in a wealthy New Jersey suburb and am not involved in organized crime. Hell, I've never even killed anybody!
Now the one that's hanging over me is The Wire. I know I would like it once I got into it, even though I don't live in a gritty neighborhood in Baltimore. I'd probably wind up watching it like I did The Sopranos. But it's many seasons, and I did watch the first episode or two and wasn't hooked. But I've semi-joked that it should be my project this winter.
--- Quote ---That looked interesting to me, but there was certainly a reason I didn't/couldn't watch it. Possibly I didn't/don't get the channel/network it aired on. Or I may have watched something else in the same time slot.
--- End quote ---
Well, I highly recommend it -- all, I think, six or seven seasons? -- if you ever find yourself in a position to watch it.
--- Quote ---And, please, let's not go back to the recording thing again.
--- End quote ---
:-X :-X :-X
--- Quote ---As I've said before, many times, there are so many choices these days that there is always something to watch "live" instead of something recorded.
--- End quote ---
I'm pickier, I guess. I decide what I'm going to watch before I turn the TV on, based on what I already know or have read/heard about it. Then I watch that thing and afterward turn the TV off. So you can see why non-streaming wouldn't work for me.
Sometimes I like combining a heavy and a light and watching for 90 minutes, though. I think while I was watching The Sopranos, I was lightening up afterward with Curb Your Enthusiasm. That was a golden era. Justified might have been on weekly in them days, too.
--- Quote ---(I guess I was brought up to be brand loyal. A few weeks ago I was really pissed off that I had to buy Endust because the supermarket seems not to carry Lemon Pledge, my mother's preferred dusting product. ;D )[/font][/size]
--- End quote ---
I can't remember what my mom had but here's a shocker: I don't think I have ever in my life purchased a dusting product of any brand. :o
Front-Ranger:
--- Quote from: serious crayons on November 13, 2019, 09:28:38 pm ---Sometimes I like combining a heavy and a light and watching for 90 minutes, though. I think while I was watching The Sopranos, I was lightening up afterward with Curb Your Enthusiasm. That was a golden era. Justified might have been on weekly in them days, too.
--- End quote ---
Interesting that you mention Curb Your Enthusiasm. I have watched only one episode, where Larry's car breaks down, he has to go to the bathroom, and he starts knocking on doors. The only person who would let him in is a lady in a burka. At first, he won't go in, but she insists and then she takes him to get the car repaired, and then a friend of his wants to meet her, but he won't introduce them, etc. It was hilarious.
So that's why I was again interested in reading "Shouts and Murmurs" in the new issue (ta da! Back to the topic at hand!) But, it was mediocre. I could have done better, I think, just using the resources of the food wars in my permaculture group.
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on November 14, 2019, 10:51:36 am ---So that's why I was again interested in reading "Shouts and Murmurs" in the new issue (ta da! Back to the topic at hand!) But, it was mediocre. I could have done better, I think, just using the resources of the food wars in my permaculture group.
--- End quote ---
Agreed. I've seen one or two other things Larry David has written for print and they weren't great, either.
In this case, the topic was kind of interesting, I guess, although politically it seemed like a confusing message. I mean, it wasn't really trying to make a political point, but obviously there are lots of people in this country whose problems are worse than first world problems. However, it's an interesting concept and would have worked if he'd set it up better. Like, better established that this candidate was specifically seeking the votes of people with FWPs (which many candidates actually do -- they're called Republicans :laugh:).
That said, it would have worked much better if he'd had a wide variety of examples involving different people. As is, I couldn't even really get through it. Maybe it would have worked better as a CYE episode.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version