The World Beyond BetterMost > The Culture Tent
In the New Yorker...
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on December 07, 2022, 12:12:17 pm ---My point is that less than 100 million people in the US live in core urban places where the existing system of travel is more or less convenient for them, assuming that when they travel, they want to go to another core urban area, rather than to someplace like...Wyoming. 225 million people + or - live in rural, suburban or small metros. When we want to travel, we have to get to the urban center, be herded onto a huge airliner, then do it all in reverse at our destination. And it costs just as much or more.
--- End quote ---
Not to sound like I'm factchecking your every post :laugh: but that urban population sounded low to me. A Census Bureau webpage says 249 million Americans, or more than 80% of the U.S. population, live in urban areas. I assume they're including suburbs, because a different page says most Americans live in suburbs. So that may explain why your number is lower, since you included suburban residents in the other group.
Anyway, many if not most airports are no more convenient for city dwellers than for suburbanites. The Minneapolis-St. Paul airport is closer to some (not all) suburbs than it is to either Minneapolis or St. Paul, and isn't Denver the same? Another site says half the people in the United States live within 17 miles of an airport, and 90 percent live within an hour's drive of one.
Not that any of this is necessarily relevant to the electric plane issue. But it's nice to know so many of us can conveniently fly to Boston!
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural/ua-facts.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-26/u-s-urban-population-is-up-but-what-does-urban-really-mean
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr-edge-frm-asst-sec-080320.html
serious crayons:
You can tell when I have a story to write -- I come here and research airport and population figures instead. :laugh:
Front-Ranger:
Here's my research:
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/05/22/demographic-and-economic-trends-in-urban-suburban-and-rural-communities/
Only 98 million in the US live in the core urban areas which are the airline hubs. Even though I live in the hub of Denver, I am frequently routed through Houston, Toronto, or (gasp) Chicago when I want to go someplace entirely different. I remember when things were different, when you could book a flight from, say, Wichita to San Antonio, whereas now you have to go to Dallas or Houston and then to another place,
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on December 07, 2022, 09:45:18 pm ---Only 98 million in the US live in the core urban areas which are the airline hubs. Even though I live in the hub of Denver, I am frequently routed through Houston, Toronto, or (gasp) Chicago when I want to go someplace entirely different. I remember when things were different, when you could book a flight from, say, Wichita to San Antonio, whereas now you have to go to Dallas or Houston and then to another place,
--- End quote ---
Oh I see, airline hubs no doubt have different figures.
Here's where I got the statistics on how many people live how close to an airport. It appears to be the blog of some random dude who got curious because his girlfriend is flying around for job interviews, but his data and methodology seem pretty meticulous.
https://www.mark-pearson.com/airport-distances/#:~:text=Half%20the%20people%20in%20the,close%3A%20less%20than%209%20miles.&text=Distance%20(mi.)
As for layovers, can't you book a direct flight from there? When I buy a plane ticket it gives me a bunch of options of times, prices, etc., including whether it's direct or not. The ones with layovers aren't necessarily cheaper, so I don't get why anyone would pick those, but maybe they just bundle a regular flight from Denver to Chicago and one from Chicago to Miami in case anyone wants to do that.
I once took a flight from Minneapolis to Atlanta that went through DENVER, which definitely doesn't make sense from a climate-change standpoint.
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Jeff Wrangler on December 06, 2022, 09:19:47 pm ---That's all true, but that wasn't my point. The Alia, and similar electric planes, can't replace airliners to move large numbers of people long distances.
--- End quote ---
Not at this time. But it wasn't so long ago a cell phone was the size of a shoebox. These days cell phones aren't just small and light but they can do a million other things, with more computing power than my old desktop had. So maybe with planes it's just a matter of time until they can make batteries smaller, lighter and more powerful.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version