The World Beyond BetterMost > The Culture Tent
In the New Yorker...
Jeff Wrangler:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on January 08, 2025, 01:20:27 pm ---I'm reading "Love and Theft" in the latest issue about an author in the romantasy genre stealing another's plot and characters. It's interesting
--- End quote ---
I'm reading that now. It is very interesting. I'm only up to magazine page 24, but on page 23 the author wrote, "Book packagers assign teams of writers and editors to create content." This sounds to me like nothing particularly new. I'm sure I read a long time ago that "Carolyn Keane," the "author" of the Nancy Drew books, was actually a team of writers.
The discussion of the genre is reminding me of a once-favorite TV show from as long ago as 2008-2009. I may have mentioned this somewhere before. It was called "Moonlight" (it had nothing to do with the much-later movie of the same name), and the main characters were an L.A. private eye, who happened to be a vampire, and a human woman, who was a reporter for an online news magazine. The show lasted only one season. I have it on DVD, and I've binge-watched it.
Front-Ranger:
Yes, and there's also Frankenstein and Dracula and a ton of fairy tales, so the genre is as old as can be. Wasn't Beowolf's mother a dragon or something. She was played by Angelina Jolie in the movie and I thought she was very believable.
The January 20 issue came today...terrific cover. Made me laugh out loud. For now, I skipped over the third installment of John McPhee's memoirs. I enjoyed the first installment, but the second, not as much. The profile of Lorne Michaels weighs in at 13 pages so I thought I would just skim it, but it turns out to be very interesting. In fact, I stayed awake into the night reading it which just never happens anymore. Many quotes and photos from the original SNL cast members. We need more escapist stuff like this going forward through this horrible month.
I won't watch the Inauguration but of course I'll have to pay attention to what happens the first few days. I hope it will be a total mess to teach them a lesson or two.
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on January 15, 2025, 12:40:13 pm ---Whatever happened to Republicans with brain cells?
--- End quote ---
There are some left. Presumably, they're all busy building fallout shelters someplace in the desert.
Front-Ranger:
Okay, I have delved into the McPhee memoir, and there's another passage about word games. This time he talks about Spelling Bee, which I think is a lot like the Merriam-Webster Blossom, which I like. He has this passage:
--- Quote ---"While the words are meant to put me to sleep, they ignite my philogiston and stand me straight up out of bed to write them down."
--- End quote ---
Google doesn't know that word, philogiston. I think McPhee is playing with us. I do understand the idea of lying awake at night thinking up words with a specific number of letters. I don't get up and write them down though. I think of it as a memory exercise. Most mornings, I remember the words, which is reassuring.
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on January 17, 2025, 09:09:23 pm ---Google doesn't know that word, philogiston.
--- End quote ---
:o
In confronting this mystery, I attempted to look it up but kept getting phlogiston, "a theory postulating the existence of a fire-like element dubbed phlogiston, contained within combustible bodies." Doesn't sound like it would fit the context of Spelling Bee. Could this be one of those once in a decade (at most!) New Yorker copy editing failures??!
Then I tried philologist and found "a person who studies the history of languages, particularly through the analysis of literature," which seemed more likely, so it could be a misspelling or some kind of wordplay, since McPhee talks about "igniting" it.
But I looked up the article online and it said phlogiston. One of those situations where a misspelling in print is fixed online (as I had to do the other day when a snarky reader emailed to say I'd misspelled "dentil molding" as "dental" -- hey, it looks like a row of teeth! -- so we changed it online and luckily it hadn't gone to print yet).
But then I looked in the print version in the magazine, which finally arrived yesterday. It does say phlogiston.
Hey, McPhee, read your ... oh wait, I was going to say read your Strunk & White, but I found a copy of Elements of Style online and it doesn't have a rule against using big fancy words.
But then I remembered who does: Mark Twain! ?Don't use a five-dollar word when a fifty-cent word will do.? Twain's quote may be less of an ironclad law than something you'd find in Strunk & White, but I will say reporters follow rules like never say "utilized," say "used."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version