The World Beyond BetterMost > Anything Goes
Should overly skinny models be banned?
delalluvia:
--- Quote from: moremojo on September 19, 2006, 11:08:40 pm ---That is why it is important for children to have guidance from trusted, mature adults, to provide counterbalance to the various messages received by the media. That seems like a better route than any kind of censorship, which can impede the legitimate pursuits of adult citizens, whose needs and interests are important too.
--- End quote ---
True, but as we all know, parents fall down on the job too often (the facts about sex and its role in life is extremely important for teenagers to learn from their parents, but how many parents actually do it or do a good job of explaining it? And that's an extremely important topic). The culture of thinness and youth is much less important on the scale of things important in life, so I doubt parents will do much better in that realm.
serious crayons:
I agree, but as a proponent of free expression speech I'm not happy about a government ban on a private enterprise. I realize different countries have different customs, and I'm no fan of anorexic models as role models. But I can't really support the banning.
Children get exposed to all kinds of unfortunate things -- always have, probably -- and it's up to supportive adults to try to help them learn to judge those things for themselves in a healthy way. Some, of course, never do, and they become adults with unhealthy attitudes, but that's how life goes. Others realize that you must always question culture, and I think that's a good thing.
But -- and this is just my view -- banning does not really accomplish the purpose. Somehow, we have to create a culture where people just don't want models like that.
Del: Your post came in while I was writing this. I can't quite tell if we agree or not?
delalluvia:
--- Quote from: latjoreme on September 19, 2006, 11:13:57 pm ---I agree, but as a proponent of free expression speech I'm not happy about a government ban on a private enterprise. I realize different countries have different customs, and I'm no fan of anorexic models as role models. But I can't really support the banning.
Children get exposed to all kinds of unfortunate things -- always have, probably -- and it's up to supportive adults to try to help them learn to judge those things for themselves in a healthy way. Some, of course, never do, and they become adults with unhealthy attitudes, but that's how life goes. Others realize that you must always question culture, and I think that's a good thing.
But -- and this is just my view -- banning does not really accomplish the purpose. Somehow, we have to create a culture where people just don't want models like that.
Del: Your post came in while I was writing this. I can't quite tell if we agree or not?
--- End quote ---
Hiya Kat,
I'm not sure. I read that back in the 70's before the advent of cable and video and the internet, mainstream TV shows used to be much more violent than they are now. There was a backlash of sorts, people believed strongly this stuff was too violent for their kids to watch, that it made kids either indifferent to violence in the real world or violent themseves.
You hear that argument now about video games, movies etc.
Personally, I thought parents should have monitored what their kids watched a lot closer to solve that issue. It's what you and mojo and I agree should have happened. However, it didn't. Instead, in response to consumer pressure, TV execs toned down the violent aspects of all shows.
So in that circumstance, a type of censorship DID occur. Obviously young adults or adutls with kids couldn't have cared less what was bad for little kids to watch. THEIR TV shows were censored and they had to put up with it.
I'm not sure, but I read that it wasn't the fed government per se in Spain that banned skinny models. It was some city watchdog agency and then it was for only that one particular show - there are many shows. Why was that agency acting? Because one or two people made a decision that they should ban models or were they acting on consumer/citizen pressure? [shrugs]
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: delalluvia on September 20, 2006, 08:30:55 pm --- I read that back in the 70's before the advent of cable and video and the internet, mainstream TV shows used to be much more violent than they are now. There was a backlash of sorts, people believed strongly this stuff was too violent for their kids to watch, that it made kids either indifferent to violence in the real world or violent themseves.
in response to consumer pressure, TV execs toned down the violent aspects of all shows.
So in that circumstance, a type of censorship DID occur. Obviously young adults or adutls with kids couldn't have cared less what was bad for little kids to watch. THEIR TV shows were censored and they had to put up with it.
I'm not sure, but I read that it wasn't the fed government per se in Spain that banned skinny models.
--- End quote ---
Well, networks or fashion shows responding to consumer pressure isn't quite the same as censorship. If the networks think there are enough people who want to watch the violent shows, so they can still make money by showing them, they'll keep showing them. But if they think that the parents' views outweigh others and they'll lose PR points and/or money if they don't pull the shows, they'll pull them. I guess I have no problem, in principle, with that. That's just how the marketplace works.
The government, whether federal or city, ordering something banned is different.
Two more quick sideline points, while we're on the topic: I've written quite a bit about how kids respond to violent programming. Research has found little to no evidence that it makes them more violent. Also, I'm not sure how much less violent TV is these days. Fewer corpses, maybe, but I've seen things on "24," for example, that would have shocked me in the 70s. They shock me now!
delalluvia:
--- Quote from: latjoreme on September 21, 2006, 12:15:14 am ---
Two more quick sideline points, while we're on the topic: I've written quite a bit about how kids respond to violent programming. Research has found little to no evidence that it makes them more violent. Also, I'm not sure how much less violent TV is these days. Fewer corpses, maybe, but I've seen things on "24," for example, that would have shocked me in the 70s. They shock me now!
--- End quote ---
If you watch some of the '70 cop shows, not only do they show bodies, they show how they got in that condition. People are shown being beaten, shot and stabbed and the wounds actually having bloody holes and blood splattered. Nowadays you see someone shot on TV, the person falls down and there is either no sign of a wound or you just see a hole or a bloody shirt and no wound.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version