The World Beyond BetterMost > The Culture Tent
Resurrecting the Movies thread...
Ellemeno:
--- Quote from: MaineWriter on December 28, 2008, 05:12:43 pm ---
There was another film this year that isn't in the "top five," or listed among the front-runners at all, and it's a profound consideration of the process of living and aging. That's Charlie Kaufman's "Synecdoche, New York." It will be viewed and valued decades from now. You mark my words.
(bolding mine).
L
--- End quote ---
Yes, I read Ebert's blog about Synecdoche, and then many pages of comments and his replies to the comments. He fawned over it like it was his Citizen Kane.
Aloysius J. Gleek:
--- Quote from: Ellemeno on December 28, 2008, 07:11:53 pm ---
Yes, I read Ebert's blog about Synecdoche, and then many pages of comments and his replies to the comments. He fawned over it like it was his Citizen Kane.
--- End quote ---
::)
Aloysius J. Gleek:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/28/opinion/28sun3.html
Editorial Notebook
Klaatu Had Better Rent the Video
By BRENT STAPLES
Published: December 27, 2008
The remake of “The Day the Earth Stood Still” is a sentimentalized take on the 1951 classic. The new version has its uses, so see it. Then rent the original and watch it late at night — the way bleary-eyed adolescents did when it could be seen only on grainy broadcasts in the wee hours of the morning.
I compared the two earlier this month, watching the vintage version for the first time in at least 25 years. I was reminded of how deeply it had insinuated itself into the DNA of popular culture. I also thought of Norma Desmond, the fallen movie idol in “Sunset Boulevard,” who said of her spent career: “I am big. It’s the pictures that got small.”
Digital effects have revolutionized the monster, science-fiction and superhero genres, making the films larger than ever visually. But the same effects have whittled away at the acting space, making the movies smaller in the dramatic sense.
The minimalist — and altogether cool — effects in the 1951 film leave lots of room for the performers. Michael Rennie is aces as Klaatu, the brainy, handsome and thoroughly polite alien who threatens to eliminate every creature on the planet — kittens, puppies and cute little babies included — if earthlings become a danger to the galaxy.
Watching the movie as a middle-aged man, I saw what I lacked eyes to see as a 12-year-old. There is no shred of sentimentality in Rennie’s performance. He is a congenial exterminating angel, dropping round for tea to tell of horrors to come.
Rennie’s Klaatu is God-fearing, emotionally sophisticated, superior to but indistinguishable from the earthlings among whom he walks. That’s an open-minded characterization at the start of a decade dominated by red-baiting and fear of outlanders in general.
Keanu Reeves’s Klaatu is numbingly monotonic. He is emotionally underdeveloped, and suffers from a robotic flatness of affect. Instead, the scriptwriters gave him powers that are predictably demonstrated through pricey special effects that do not sustain dramatic momentum. With all this digital sleight of hand, the performers are reduced to the equivalent of bystanders at a fireworks show.
By making the new Klaatu emotionally naïve, the writers make him subject to earthling tears and cuddly puppy influences that would have cut no mustard with the Klaatu of old. This emotional vulnerability allows for a great deal of unjustified optimism about the human race’s ability to change its destructive behavior.
It is nearly impossible to recast a movie that is so deeply embedded in pop cultural understanding. The virtue of the new Klaatu is that he points us back to the original.
Ellemeno:
--- Quote from: jmmgallagher on December 28, 2008, 07:23:18 pm ---With all this digital sleight of hand, the performers are reduced to the equivalent of bystanders at a fireworks show.
--- End quote ---
Well, some people know how to make the most of being bystanders at a fireworks show.
delalluvia:
'Michael Rennie is aces as Klaatu, the brainy, handsome and thoroughly polite alien who threatens to eliminate every creature on the planet — kittens, puppies and cute little babies included — if earthlings become a danger to the galaxy.
Watching the movie as a middle-aged man, I saw what I lacked eyes to see as a 12-year-old. There is no shred of sentimentality in Rennie’s performance. He is a congenial exterminating angel, dropping round for tea to tell of horrors to come..."
Very god-like. He's the dispassionate outsider, knowing in his vast experience that sometimes you reap, but sometimes you have to cull.
Hmmm, wonder why the 50's showed a more adult attitude than our current version.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version