Our BetterMost Community > Chez Tremblay

Heath Heath Heath

<< < (1758/1792) > >>

Ellemeno:

--- Quote from: Penthesilea on April 08, 2011, 12:50:54 am ---
Thank you for telling us! :)

Thank you to Ruth/rhomboideus for creating this little gem. :)

--- End quote ---


Wait - you mean it really is Heath with Jake's smile?

Penthesilea:

--- Quote from: Ellemeno on April 12, 2011, 01:51:45 am ---
Wait - you mean it really is Heath with Jake's smile?

--- End quote ---


No, look at the post I quoted. I didn't refer to the pic Paul posted, but to the caricature I posted on Heath's birthday.

Ellemeno:



I'm posting this here, because Michael Stipe is getting older, but Heath isn't.


Penthesilea:

--- Quote from: Ellemeno on May 07, 2011, 02:09:09 am ---


I'm posting this here, because Michael Stipe is getting older, but Heath isn't.




--- End quote ---


This is eerie. Not what you posted, but that I had the exact same thought this morning.
Coming from another train of thought, I got thinking about differences (look-wise) between people in their late twenties and people approaching their mid thirties. And then I thought of Heath. If you could see the age difference of three years?
But of course, Heath isn't getting any older. :(



But Michael Stipe - man, he does have that 'old man look' now. :-\

Andrew:
Depending on further information about Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life, which just got the Palme D'Or at Cannes, there is a reasonable chance I may see it at some point.  Whereas if Heath had been in it, as was a definite at one point, it would have been a maddening waiting game it it was released.  And after I do see it, it will be impossible for me not to try to imagine how it might have been transformed...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Lhv7VdnpA

 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version