The World Beyond BetterMost > The Culture Tent

Rewriting Homosexual Biographies in Film

(1/3) > >>

louisev:
 
I was astonished today in a conversation with a friend to find out that John Nash, the mathematician and subject of the award winning biographical adaptation 'A Beautiful Mind' with Russell Crowe, had had a number of homosexual affairs and was arrested for indecency in Santa Monica while working for the Rand Corporation when he solicited a man in a public bathroom.  I didn't see that in the film! However, this information was in the biography from which the film was derived, which got me digging into a little more background.

 I ran across the following fascinating article by William J. Davis in "Close Up Film" entitled "The Rights to Re-write" which discusses the 'degayification' of homosexual biographies in Hollywood, an extension of the themes in the oft-cited 'Celluloid Closet.'

http://www.close-upfilm.com/features/Featuresarchive/rightstorewrite.htm

Hollywood has a long way to go.

delalluvia:
That is extremely interesting, Louise.

I saw the movie, and the producers did say they took liberties with his life story.  In real life, Nash and his wife did not stay together, they divorced, were apart for many years, then got back together.  I wonder if all these affairs took place in the interim - and if so, that's probably their excuse for leaving something so defining out because they skipped that part of his life.

louisev:
a more extensive discussion of the biography in 'Ferment' as well as other sources, makes it known that Nash, in selling his story to filmmakers, specifically denied them permission to include any elements of 'bisexuality' in portraying him.  However, the screenplay, and the film as shot, also downplayed several other less-than-savory parts about his biography, including the fact that he had an illegitimate son whom he refused to acknowledge and support, by a woman he refused to marry, before he married Alicia.  His first son was shuttled between a dozen foster homes and Nash never offered a dollar in support even though he was fully employed and 'earning a King's ransom for the Rand Corporation' during that time.  He never did support his first son until forced to by the courts.

delalluvia:

--- Quote from: louise van hine on January 01, 2008, 01:37:06 pm ---a more extensive discussion of the biography in 'Ferment' as well as other sources, makes it known that Nash, in selling his story to filmmakers, specifically denied them permission to include any elements of 'bisexuality' in portraying him.  However, the screenplay, and the film as shot, also downplayed several other less-than-savory parts about his biography, including the fact that he had an illegitimate son whom he refused to acknowledge and support, by a woman he refused to marry, before he married Alicia.  His first son was shuttled between a dozen foster homes and Nash never offered a dollar in support even though he was fully employed and 'earning a King's ransom for the Rand Corporation' during that time.  He never did support his first son until forced to by the courts.

--- End quote ---

What a nice guy  :P

Well, that just turned me off of him completely.  Just goes to show you can be a genius and still be a shit as a human being.

Artiste:
Thanks!

I just discovered this thread. And like it and I will find it more and more interesting!!

Even if it was true that Nash did not pay $ firstly for his first son's welfare, still he is human... (straights and others act like that too unfortunately) and everything needs to be said and found out, I feel yet!

Coming back to this thread headline: Rewriting Homosexual Biographies in Film, I find that very interesting and may it continue!

Regarding this title, you have mentioned (by a critic...): Yet sadly, because the film has not been judged a success, and because it did not set the box office alight, there is a high probability that these failures will be attributed to its frankness regarding Alexander's sexuality, and thus used as reasons for Hollywood not to green light future big budget epics that involve such a depiction. Thus could it be that those who extolled Alexander for its daring representation were premature in their praises...
....
To that, may I say that this Alexander film would probably or possibly been better to make $ if it had shown Alexander the Great as an gay or bi man!! Then, it would have made maybe more than 200 millions bucks the Brokeback Mountain movie did?? Likely so, I feel since I always read that Alexander was gay!! So, why now such greek lawyers against that - is it because Greece is now becoming muslim and thus anti-gay??

....
Concerning Certainly one might expect some agreement on this point from writer Paula Martinac, who suggested it was a good thing that A Beautiful Mind did not portray John Nash as a homosexual; because his eventual marriage would be seen as making a comment on the (non-)viability of homosexuality.

.........
To this may I reply, is that so too with the Brokeback Mountain film: (non-)vialibity of homosexuality?
Since some think that even the two main charators (Ennis ansd Jack) are straights??
.....

Hugs!! May Hollywood write and do homosexual portraits of real gay men lives!!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page