Our BetterMost Community > The Polling Place
The Royal Wedding of William and Kate - And What Came After
Aloysius J. Gleek:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/08/world/europe/nurses-death-stirs-sharp-criticism-of-royal-prank-call.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all
Prank Call
Seeking Royal Family Secrets
Takes Horrifying Turn
By SARAH LYALL
Published: December 7, 2012
LONDON — As pranks go, this one appeared outrageous and obnoxious rather than malicious: after convincing a hospital nurse who answered the phone this week that they were Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles, two Australian radio hosts then tricked another nurse into disclosing medical information about the pregnant Duchess of Cambridge, who had been admitted with acute morning sickness.
The call was broadcast on Australia radio; then it went out around the world.
But the stunt took a horrific and unexpected turn on Friday, when the nurse who answered the call, 46-year-old Jacintha Saldanha, was found dead, an apparent suicide.
The Metropolitan Police would not release details of the death, except to say that they had received a call reporting that there was an unconscious woman at Weymouth Street, in central London, and two ambulance crews had arrived to find Mrs. Saldanha already dead. A police spokesman said they were not treating the death as suspicious.
It was unclear what exactly had happened since the prank itself to make Mrs. Saldanha, who was reportedly married and had two children, take her life. King Edward VII’s Hospital, where she worked, said it had not disciplined her, but rather had been “supporting her during this difficult time.” Nor, apparently, had the royal family raised a fuss with the hospital, an exclusive private institution that has long been the hospital of choice for Britain’s royals.
“At no point did the palace complain to the hospital about the incident,” a spokesman for St. James’s Palace said. “On the contrary, we offered our full and heartfelt support to the nurses involved and the hospital staff at all times.”
The turn of events was seen as so shocking that it provoked a response from even the prime minister of Australia, Julia Gillard, who called it “a terrible tragedy.”
Whatever the immediate impetus for Mrs. Saldanha’s death, the episode was a sobering reminder of the harm that can come in a media landscape where the boundaries between news and entertainment are blurred, where hosts and programs find increasingly outrageous ways of attracting attention, often without considering who might be hurt along the way; and where anything out of the ordinary — an embarrassing video, a humiliating audio clip, a bit of foolish behavior — tends to spread quickly via the Internet, and seems to never go away.
Britain’s tabloids have long sought ways to penetrate the royal family’s carapace, to get past the barriers and the press operatives to the humans underneath. In 2007, a News of the World reporter was jailed for hacking into the voice mail of members of the royal household. Four years earlier, The Daily Mirror published a series of photographs of the inside of Buckingham Palace — showing that the queen’s cereal was brought to the table in Tupperware containers and that the Duke of York’s apartment contained stuffed animals and a cushion saying, “Eat, sleep and remarry” — after one of its reporters underhandedly got a job as a royal footman.
And in 1995, a Canadian D.J., pretending to be Jean Chrétien, then the Canadian prime minister, somehow got through to Buckingham Palace and spent 15 minutes talking to the queen about, among other things, Quebec’s referendum on proposals for independence. The palace called the prank “irritating and regrettable.”
The latest breach came courtesy of the Sydney radio station 2Day FM, during a program presented by the D.J.’s Mel Greig and Michael Christian. The station had gotten into trouble before: In 2009, it was reprimanded by the government media watchdog after a 14-year-old girl, brought on the show by her mother, was attached to a lie detector during a live broadcast and asked if she was having sex. She revealed that she had been raped. Last year, the watchdog imposed tough new licensing conditions on the station after one of its hosts called a journalist a “fat slag” and threatened her on the air.
On Tuesday, Ms. Greig took on the role of the queen, while Mr. Christian pretended to be Prince Charles. Telephoning the hospital, Ms. Greig asked to be put through to “my granddaughter Kate” — the duchess, who was being treated for severe morning sickness.
The hospital would not confirm that Mrs. Saldanha was the person who took the call, but reports in the British news media said that she was, and that she had been filling in at the hospital reception desk in the early morning hours. Responding to the person she thought was the queen, she said “Oh, yes — just hold on, ma’am.”
She then transferred the call to a duty nurse, who revealed that the duchess was “stable,” that she had had “an uneventful night,” that she had been given fluids and was sleeping on and off and that she had not been “retching.”
The hospital was fooled, despite the call having been almost laughably amateurish. At one point, for instance, Ms. Greig, playing the queen, asked the fake Charles when he planned to “walk those bloody corgis.” Barking noises could be heard in the background.
When news of the hoax got out, it was condemned as a “foolish prank” by the hospital, which said it would review its telephone procedures. In Australia, the hosts issued an anemic statement saying “we’re sorry if we’ve caused any issues,” even as the station continued to promote the stunt as “the prank call the world is talking about.”
On Twitter, the two D.J.’s bragged about the hoax. Ms. Greig, a former contestant on the Australian version of “The Amazing Race,” told Australian reporters that she was surprised the call had gotten through and had fooled anyone, given her poor English accent. “This is by far the best prank I’ve ever been involved in,” the Adelaide Now newspaper quoted her as saying. “It’s definitely a career highlight.”
By late Friday — early Saturday in Sydney — the station had posted a new statement. It was “deeply saddened by the tragic news of the death of nurse Jacintha Saldanha from King Edward VII’s Hospital,” the statement said. “We extend our deepest sympathies to her family and all that have been affected by this situation around the world.”
The statement added that Mr. Christian and Ms. Greig would remain off the air indefinitely, “out of respect for what only can be described as a tragedy.”
But the apology was met with little sympathy on social media sites. “You weak dogs. You’ve got blood on your hands now,” Aaron Reschke from South Australia wrote on the station’s Facebook page. “Both presenters and their producer should be charged over this woman’s death.”
Back in London, the hospital said that Mrs. Saldanha had been a nurse there for four years. “She was an excellent nurse and well-respected and popular with all of her colleagues,” it said.
In a statement, the chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing, Dr. Peter Carter, said, “It is deeply saddening that a simple human error due to a cruel hoax could lead to the death of a dedicated and caring member of the nursing profession.”
Matt Siegel contributed reporting from Sydney, Australia.
Katie77:
Unfortunately, Brian, millions of people do not feel the same as you regarding wanting to know as much as they can about the Royal family. Stories on the Royals are what keep a lot of newspapers and magazines in business, because every little thing they do is of interest to so many people.
Once upon a time people and the media had a respect for people's privacy, but now, because of people's interest, they do and say anything to get a hot story. So its hard to know who is to blame for some media frenzy. Human nature has changed, just like so many other things have changed, and some of it, is not very tasteful.
I too, adore the Queen, she has been exemplorary in her position, but I worry a bit about those who will follow in her footsteps as well as those that work behind the scenes to protect that the monarchy remains where it is.
Jeff Wrangler:
--- Quote from: Katie77 on December 07, 2012, 11:06:04 pm ---I too, adore the Queen, she has been exemplorary in her position, but I worry a bit about those who will follow in her footsteps as well as those that work behind the scenes to protect that the monarchy remains where it is.
--- End quote ---
And I understand that now the heir (or heiress) to the throne, who may expect to become the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, is no longer prohibited from marrying a Roman Catholic. 8)
Marge_Innavera:
--- Quote from: Katie77 on December 04, 2012, 02:30:21 am ---To Royalists its a very big deal....the forthcoming birth of maybe a new king or queen....and of course something to fill the magazines.....
--- End quote ---
All this confirmed my hunch that being famous can be a major bummer, unless it happens after you're dead. Imagine going through a pregnancy with the whole world commenting on it! 8)
Marge_Innavera:
--- Quote from: Kelda on December 07, 2012, 06:46:13 pm ---What a shame :( I wonder if her bosses had given her a really hard time over this?
--- End quote ---
They might have in private, but this woman also could have had a lot of problems in her personal life, including depression. Being the butt of a practical joke that the entire world knew about could certainly push someone over the edge if they were already having a hard time coping for whatever reason.
And frankly, I'm rather cynical about the station's claim to be "deeply saddened." It smacks of the apologies you sometimes hear from politicians who don't regret the context of their words but are so very, very sorry that there was a negative reaction [e.g., "I apologize to anyone who was offended by my words"]. If this makes someone think twice in the future something constructive might come of it but considering the state of today's "news" media, I tend to doubt it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version