Our BetterMost Community > BetterMost People

On Caregiving

<< < (9/77) > >>

Jeff Wrangler:

--- Quote from: Jeff Wrangler on January 28, 2016, 11:55:53 am ---Seriously? Cats don't need boosters for whatever they get shots for? (I'm sure dogs do.) She never got regular check-ups?

--- End quote ---

I spoke to my supervisor, who has two indoor cats. She rather sheepishly admitted that she hasn't taken them to the vet in five years.

Just sayin' to show that I'm learning about cats and their staff.

My supervisor also told me that she once had to have a cat euthanized, and the vet told her pretty much what the vet has told FR; however, in the end, the vet actually charged for the office visit but not for the euthanasia.

Front-Ranger:
I suppose vets would like cats to come in and have regular checkups and booster shots and all that, but if your cat is happy and healthy, why bother? Even registration is optional for cats. Mine does have a microchip in case she got away.

While I was talking on the phone, Diva jumped down from her chair, dragged herself through the kitchen and hall and into the laundry room and used the paper around her litter box. Good kitty!!

serious crayons:

--- Quote from: Jeff Wrangler on January 28, 2016, 11:53:59 am ---I don't think so. It could just be, Not yet.
--- End quote ---

But no, it was FR who didn't follow through, not the vet. The vet presumably said now was fine, hence the 24-hour window for doing it.


--- Quote ---A veterinary practice is a business, same as any other business. Things can be done if a pet owner can't afford it, but FR clearly can afford it.
--- End quote ---

I'm not saying they should give free services just because the person is grieving. But one diagnosis of "this pet is ready to be put down" seems like enough. If the pet needs to be rediagnosed on the second examination, perhaps just in case the pet's time actually hasn't come and euthanasia isn't appropriate, that implies the first diagnosis was incorrect, and had FR acted on it within the 24 hours she would have euthanized her pet needlessly.


Jeff Wrangler:

--- Quote from: serious crayons on January 28, 2016, 10:11:21 pm ---I'm not saying they should give free services just because the person is grieving. But one diagnosis of "this pet is ready to be put down" seems like enough. If the pet needs to be rediagnosed on the second examination, perhaps just in case the pet's time actually hasn't come and euthanasia isn't appropriate, that implies the first diagnosis was incorrect, and had FR acted on it within the 24 hours she would have euthanized her pet needlessly.

--- End quote ---

Or, it can simply confirm the first diagnosis.

CellarDweller:
Our cat goes to the vet once a year for a check up and a grooming, but I suspect if the grooming wasn't needed, the vet trips would be less.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version