BetterMost, Wyoming & Brokeback Mountain Forum
Brokeback Mountain: Our Community's Common Bond => Brokeback Mountain Open Forum => All Things Brokeback: Books, Interviews and More => Topic started by: delalluvia on April 16, 2006, 08:20:51 pm
-
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/commentary/0,6115,1181063_21_0_,00.html (http://www.ew.com/ew/article/commentary/0,6115,1181063_21_0_,00.html)
They could have easily found someone a little more on the ball to defend BBM. >:(
-
Could not agree more... lame. I could have thought of a dozen better answers to all of those "problems" he saw with the movie...
Oh well, it's kind of a pointless debate this late in the game anyway, IMO. Plus, when the guy who is against the movie quotes Hanson in the first sentence or two, can you really take him seriously? ::)
-
Could not agree more... lame. I could have thought of a dozen better answers to all of those "problems" he saw with the movie...
Oh well, it's kind of a pointless debate this late in the game anyway, IMO. Plus, when the guy who is against the movie quotes Hanson in the first sentence or two, can you really take him seriously? ::)
LOL! Good point!
-
I swear, these people take opposing sides just to create tension and keep their names in the spotlight. Ie: save their jobs. What an ass that guy is. >:(
-
Boys Don't Cry a cowboy romance? K. Reeves and River Phoenix not alpha males? This is beyond ridiculous! Besides, the critic doesn't seem to realize that the story spans only 20 years. The essence of lameness!!