BetterMost, Wyoming & Brokeback Mountain Forum

The World Beyond BetterMost => The Culture Tent => Topic started by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 07:42:41 am

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 07:42:41 am
"count upon nothing, but make your own nest against the storm"

"I lit the nightlamp and set it by the bed, and watched with him, til at morning the embalmers came to take him from me and fill him with everlasting myrhh."


-The Persian Boy  by Mary Renault

So wonderful to meet a fellow Mary Renault fan. I love this quote from The Persian Boy:

"I used to wonder at first what faint pleasant scent he (Alexander the Great) used, and would look about for the phial; but there was none, it was the gift of nature."

This demonstrates brilliantly the depth of Renault's research skills, for she is quoting from Aristoxenus' memoir, where he says a very pleasant scent came from Alexander's skin and that there was a fragrance  in his breath and all his body which permeated the clothes he wore.

I love the extremely intimate insight these few words allow us into Alexander's most personal self. In an age when bathing and dental hygiene were not high on Macedonian soldiers' priorities, especially when on campaign, it's no wonder Alexander's men worshiped him. Not only did he have the gorgeously handsome appearance of a god, he smelt like one too! (whereas they, I imagine, would not be so nice to be near!)

I'll try to locate some more favourite quotes to share.

Kerry
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 07:54:03 am
I love the character of Bagoas...she took a handful of historical records of his existance and created this incredible person that endured so much yet never grew bitter...

I find myself thinking on what she wrote very often. So many lessons to learn from her...she was a very wise woman...

Glad to meet another fan too!!
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 08:13:28 am
I love the character of Bagoas...she took a handful of historical records of his existance and created this incredible person that endured so much yet never grew bitter...

I find myself thinking on what she wrote very often. So many lessons to learn from her...she was a very wise woman...

Glad to meet another fan too!!

Have you read "Mary Renault - A Biography," by David Sweetman? It's an authorised biography and has lots of lovely pics of Mary and her partner,Julia Mullard. It is published by Harcourt Brace & Co.

Here's another wonderful description of Alexander by Bagoas, from "The Persian Boy":

"He was seemly in sleep, his mouth closed, his breathing silent, his body fresh and sweet. The room smelled of sex and cedarwood, with the tang of salt from the sea. Autumn drew on, the night wind blew from the north. I drew the blanket over him; without waking, he moved to me in the great bed, seeking warmth."

So beautiful.

Kerry
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 08:14:45 am
One of my favorite things about The Persian Boy is the tender love that Bagoas expresses for Alexander...here is this slave that has spent the last four years being sold to men and as a concubine but he seems so innocent in the love he develops for Alexander...

"But although in my calling I felt as old as time, my heart, which no one had trained, was young, and suddenly it mastered me"

these are the first books I have ever seen that accept homosexuality completely...it is not presented as an 'issue' just a normal part of life...(and isn't it?)
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 08:17:15 am
Have you read "Mary Renault - A Biography," by David Sweetman? It's an authorised biography and has lots of lovely pics on Mary and her partner,Julia Mullard. It is published by Harcourt Brace & Co.

Here's another wonderful description of Alexander by Bagoas, from "The Persian Boy":

"He was seemly in sleep, his mouth closed, his breathing silent, his body fresh and sweet. The room smelled of sex and cedarwood, with the tang of salt from the sea. Autumn drew on, the night wind blew from the north. I drew the blanket over him; without waking, he moved to me in the great bed, seeking warmth."

So beautiful.

Kerry

no I had not...I was JUST going to ask you if you had ever seen anything on her life! thank you I will order it.

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 08:18:34 am
The Persian Boy is my very favorite. Do you have a fave?
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 08:27:28 am
One of the sweetest and most touching scenes she wrote was a scene in "Fire From Heaven"

Alexander and Hephaistion had climbed up on a high roof to talk (they were midteen at the time) They are in love and innocent still and the scene is so tender...to get the entire flavor of it you would have to quote the entire scene...but she captures youthful desire and confusion so expertly...here Hephaistion has his arm draped

"Hephaistion was thinking how fragile his rib cage seemed, how terrible were the warring desires to cherish it and to crush it"
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 08:35:14 am
The Persian Boy is my very favorite. Do you have a fave?

The Persian Boy is my favourite. I've read it many times over the years.

Mary Renault was very ahead of her time in the way she addressed homosexulaity. I'm sure she would agree with you that it shouldn't be an "issue," being gay herself. For example, in her biography of Alexander, "The Nature of Alexander," first published in 1975, comes this quote:

"The certainty is that he never became uxorious. With Hephaestion he remained in love, at a depth where the physical relationship becomes almost irrelevant; and years later Bagoas was still his recognized eromenos. He had been disinhibited, not reversed, and had now achieved the normal Greek bisexuality."

Kerry
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 08:46:05 am
there is a quote in the front of "The Nature of Alexander" (I don't see my copy right off...may be in my son's room..and I ain't going in there...I value my life and limbs!!  :laugh:) but it says in effect that you should judge someone by the standards of their OWN time.

It is interesting to me to see how Alexander is portrayed and how she made such a strong arguement against some of the myths surrounding him. For example the story that he was a raging alcoholic...the facts don't back that charge up...

and how the Athenians worked so hard to destroy his legacy..and why...

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 08:57:44 am
there is a quote in the front of "The Nature of Alexander" (I don't see my copy right off...may be in my son's room..and I ain't going in there...I value my life and limbs!!  :laugh:) but it says in effect that you should judge someone by the standards of their OWN time.

It is interesting to me to see how Alexander is portrayed and how she made such a strong arguement against some of the myths surrounding him. For example the story that he was a raging alcoholic...the facts don't back that charge up...

and how the Athenians worked so hard to destroy his legacy..and why...

It would be impossible for an alcoholic to achieve as much as he did at such a young age. Having said that, however, I must say that it is indisputable historical fact that he enjoyed the odd drop of wine!!! Wine was a very strong brew in those days and it was traditional to dilute it with water in the ancient world. The Macedonians were notorious for drinking their wine straight. It is documented that Alexander lost control whilst under the influence of alcohol - specifically when he killed one of his most beloved generals (forget his name). Re the Athenians, well, they hated him. They were such snobs! Everyone who wasn't Athenian was inferior, especially Macedonians!

It's approaching midnight here and I must away to bed. I will post a beautiful description of Hephaistion from "The Nature of Alexander" tomorrow. I look forward to staying in touch.

Kerry

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 08:59:09 am
I am really enjoying our conversation about Mary Renaults books...I think I might split it off into its own thread!

Good night!

I look forward to talking again!

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on December 30, 2006, 02:11:49 pm
The Persian Boy is my favourite. I've read it many times over the years.

"The certainty is that he never became uxorious. With Hephaestion he remained in love, at a depth where the physical relationship becomes almost irrelevant; and years later Bagoas was still his recognized eromenos. He had been disinhibited, not reversed, and had now achieved the normal Greek bisexuality."

Kerry

I very much enjoyed Mary Renault's books on Alexander.  I am curious though.  I wonder if her attitude about Hephaestion and Alexander's relationship was not based in her own attitudes about love and sex where 'love is the more pure' and higher than base sex.

Macedonian male sexual relationships did not completely ape the classic Greek ones.  Alexander and Hephaestion, so close in age, their relationship constant throughout their lives, flew in the face of the typical erastes/eromenos model of Athens. 

Certainly Alexander was influenced by Aristotle's attitudes toward men and sex, but that didn't stop him from having sex with Bagoas and the odd page who caught his eye.  In fact, or as far as we know, it didn't stop him at all.  Why would we assume that his sexual relationship with Hephaestion 'evolved' into something that didn't include sexual relations?  Indeed, there is the story of Hephaestion joining Alexander's generals around Alexander's tent before a big battle and saying the equivalent of 'good day' instead of 'good morning' implying that he had already bade Alexander a 'good morning'.  He was caught out and everyone apparently knew it.

Alexander's appetitie for Bagoas/boys didn't fade throughout his life, why should his desire for Hephaestion fade either, especially with love as its basis and the oft commented fact that Hephaestion was one of the best looking men around?

'The Persian Boy' is not one of my favorites.  Her book on Alexander's life and 'Fire from Heaven' I like better.  I guess because in 'Fire from Heaven' she makes it quite clear that Hephaestion is passionately in love with Alexander, loyal to the death and constantly frustrated by Alexander's attitude toward sex.  Alexander is coy and reticent to the point that Hephaestion thinks Alexander has a phobia about it.

Since Renault carried over the same characters into 'The Persian Boy', I find I have a lot of sympathy for how Renault's Hephaestion must have felt to see Alexander - the man he is deeply in love with and always desired - suddenly discover he likes sex a lot, enough to have a 'boy' live in his tent with him - leaving Hephaestion out in the cold.

I imagine the rejection and constant heartbreak of Hephaestion must have felt whenever I read 'The Persian Boy', so it's not one of my favorites.

As for the original post request - gah, I have waaaaaaaaaaay too many lines from books and movies that I love.  I'll try to remember a few and post as I do.
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 04:23:32 pm
I go back to the phrase that we should judge people by their own ages and not by our own moral standards...

there does not appear (to me) any evidence that casual sexual activity was frowned upon or considered cheating...the concept is a Victorian one to me...

at that time most men had multiple partners throughout their lives...slaves kept for sexual purposes, the famous hetarias of Athens...while I am sure Hephaistion was not OVERJOYED at the presence of a sex slave in Alexanders household it would not have been an unusual arrangement at all in that period. Remember also that most soldiers took women and boys from conquered towns to use as concubines even though most had wives back in Macedon. And in Persia itself harems were the norm..
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on December 30, 2006, 08:10:26 pm
I go back to the phrase that we should judge people by their own ages and not by our own moral standards...

there does not appear (to me) any evidence that casual sexual activity was frowned upon or considered cheating...the concept is a Victorian one to me...

at that time most men had multiple partners throughout their lives...slaves kept for sexual purposes, the famous hetarias of Athens...while I am sure Hephaistion was not OVERJOYED at the presence of a sex slave in Alexanders household it would not have been an unusual arrangement at all in that period. Remember also that most soldiers took women and boys from conquered towns to use as concubines even though most had wives back in Macedon. And in Persia itself harems were the norm..

Not so much as cheating, but the idea that Renault's Hephaestion longed for, hungered for, more physical affection from Alexander and instead Alexander gave it to Bagoas and pages and his wives and concubines.  I'm sure Hephaestion had his own pieces around, but it's not the same as getting it from the person you love and it appears from the 'Persian Boy' that Alexander rarely gave in to Hephaestion's physical desires.

Sad for him.  Though you are right, Hephaestion was probably not happy at all, but he would not lower himself to feel things like jealousy as if he were in competition with slaves and dancing boys.
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 09:03:26 pm
One of my favorite things about The Persian Boy is the tender love that Bagoas expresses for Alexander...here is this slave that has spent the last four years being sold to men and as a concubine but he seems so innocent in the love he develops for Alexander...

"But although in my calling I felt as old as time, my heart, which no one had trained, was young, and suddenly it mastered me"

these are the first books I have ever seen that accept homosexuality completely...it is not presented as an 'issue' just a normal part of life...(and isn't it?)

It is my understanding that Bagoas was no mere catamite. He was of noble birth, whose family had somehow fallen from favour (I forget the full story just now). Importantly, it must be remembered that he was Darius' eromenos, and had enjoyed a favoured place, as such, at the Great King's court. Alexander knew this and treated him accordingly, with respect (and love).

Kerry 
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 09:08:01 pm
hi Kerry!

you promised a description of Hephaistion from "The Nature of Alexander"!!

I ranked her books last night and realized I had left off the Theseus books!!  :P
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on December 30, 2006, 09:21:02 pm
hi Kerry!

you promised a description of Hephaistion from "The Nature of Alexander"!!


Was there one, Kerry?  I don't recall.  Just the basic 'he was taller, better looking' and I think the color of his hair was mentioned.  About it.
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 09:28:59 pm
Alexander's appetitie for Bagoas/boys didn't fade throughout his life, why should his desire for Hephaestion fade either, especially with love as its basis and the oft commented fact that Hephaestion was one of the best looking men around?

Since Renault carried over the same characters into 'The Persian Boy', I find I have a lot of sympathy for how Renault's Hephaestion must have felt to see Alexander - the man he is deeply in love with and always desired - suddenly discover he likes sex a lot, enough to have a 'boy' live in his tent with him - leaving Hephaestion out in the cold.

I imagine the rejection and constant heartbreak of Hephaestion must have felt whenever I read 'The Persian Boy', so it's not one of my favorites.

When we look back at the ancient world, it is very important to remember that it is an era that existed long before our present Christian era, with all its moral hang-ups and prudery. Alexander, Hephaestion and Bagoas were men of their times, not ours. As for Bagoas being a "boy," it is my understanding that he was a "youth" when he met Alexander, not a child. I can find no evidence that Alexander had any relationships with "boys." In this, he was proudly Macedonian, not Athenian! His preference seems to be for handsome young men and women, probably in that order (LOL). The belief of the day was that  men were for love and women were for babies (i.e., to father children by). Though this sounds chauvinistic and sexist when viewed through our "civilized" (hey, let's not try to define that term LOL), rose-tinted glasses, it was all that they knew and not unusual to them in the least. As for Hephaestion, I believe Alexander never ceased to love him. This can be proved by the way he mourned and deified him following his death. And by the "nervous breakdown" he experience following Hephaestion's death, which ultimately led to his own death. Why did Alexander "cheat on" Hephaestion? Again, we are here arrogantly and inappropriately applying our own modern moral code onto an ancient people. Alexander was the King. He did it "because he could." It's that simple! Hephaestion would have known and understood this, and loved Alexander no less because of it.
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 09:32:30 pm
according to the book Bagoas was sixteen...
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 10:44:36 pm
From Mary Renault’s “The Nature of Alexander”:

He (Hephaestion) is described by Curtius as being taller than Alexander, and better looking, in which case he was certainly handsome. No historian states plainly whether they were physically lovers; but Plutarch says that on the site of Troy, Alexander laid a wreath on Achilles’ tomb, and Hephaestion on Patroclus’. In spite of Homer’s reticence, classical Greece assumed the heroes’ love to be sexual. It would be characteristic of Alexander’s passion for personal loyalties to make so public an avowal. Olympias, at any rate, was wildly jealous of their attachment and railed by letter at Hephaestion half across Asia. A fragmentary retort of his survived: “Stop quarrelling with me; not that in any case I shall much care. You know Alexander means more to me than anyone.”

And this regarding the famous faux pas of the Persian Queen Mother, Sisygambis, gives us another insight into Hephaestion‘s handsome, noble bearing:

Arrian admits that the event has accumulated legend. He, Curtius and Plutarch vary only slightly, and all to the same effect. Alexander brought Hephaestion with him. They walked in together, both simply dressed. Hephaestion’s looks and presence first struck the women, used to associate height with royalty, and the venerable Sisygambis began to prostrate herself before him (Hephaestion). He drew back; the harem eunuchs made warning signs; in distress she began again with the King (Alexander). He (Alexander) stepped forward and raised her up. “Never mind, Mother. You made no mistake, he too is Alexander.” Mystifying as this may have seemed when passed through an interpreter, she thanked him with regal dignity.

And this description of Alexander is quite striking:

Alexander’s reign began in 336BC. He was little over twenty. 

“His physical looks are best portrayed in the statues Lysippus made of him. (Plutarch does not divulge which of Alexander’s own contemporaries, if any, expressed this view.) And he approved being sculpted by him alone. (But he must have licensed a number of others.) For this artist has caught exactly those idiosyncrasies which many of his successors and friends later tried to imitate - the pose of his neck, tilted a little leftward, and his liquid eyes. Apelles’ painting, ‘The Thunder-Wielder,’ did not get his complexion right, but made it too dark and tanned; for he was blond, they say, shading to ruddy on the breast and face.”

His liquid eyes were grey. Their expressiveness altered Greek artistic convention. All important portrait heads feature a heavy bulge of the forehead above the brows (allowing for idealization, probably even more marked in life), caused perhaps by the development of the frontal lobes of the brain; and the loosely waving, heavy mane of hair, springing from the peak, its individual cut sloped down to the base of the neck when in south Greece the short curly crop was in fashion. Arrian, both of whose main sources were men who saw him often, says that he was very handsome.

In Aristoxenus’ memoir it is said that a very pleasant scent came from his skin, and that there was a fragrance in his breath and all his body which permeated the clothes he wore.

LOL

Kerry
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 30, 2006, 11:21:55 pm
Not so much as cheating, but the idea that Renault's Hephaestion longed for, hungered for, more physical affection from Alexander and instead Alexander gave it to Bagoas and pages and his wives and concubines.  I'm sure Hephaestion had his own pieces around, but it's not the same as getting it from the person you love and it appears from the 'Persian Boy' that Alexander rarely gave in to Hephaestion's physical desires.

Sad for him.  Though you are right, Hephaestion was probably not happy at all, but he would not lower himself to feel things like jealousy as if he were in competition with slaves and dancing boys.

I guess if we'd been a fly on the wall, way back there in Persia, we may very well have overheard Hephaestion say to Alexander, "I can't make it on a couple of high-altitude fucks once or twice a year."  :o  LOL

Kerry   ;)
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 30, 2006, 11:31:59 pm
now see I don't think it was that big a drought for old Hephaistion...at least in The Persian Boy Bagoas commented that he was often left in camp while they went off on campaign...

and we all know how you men are when you get out in the woods in a tent!!
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 31, 2006, 02:35:38 am
Hi there, Injest. You're up late tonight. It's New Year's Eve here in Sydney and I'm looking forward to watching the fireworks from my place later-on  :o Happy New Year to you!  :laugh: I look forward to further chats with you about "you know who" in the new year. I have a confession for your ears only! Do you promise not to tell another soul?   ;) Here it is - I was in love with Alexander and Hephaestion long before Jack and Ennis emerged from the brilliant imagination of Annie Proulx. Doen't mean I love Jack and Ennis any less. They're all tragic, star-crossed lovers who died young - except Ennis that is! Makes me so sad to think of that lonesome trailer he ended up in?  :'(

LOL

Kerry
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on December 31, 2006, 02:40:59 am
Hi there, Injest. You're up late tonight. It's New Year's Eve here in Sydney and I'm looking forward to watching the fireworks from my place later-on  :o Happy New Year to you!  :laugh: I look forward to further chats with you about "you know who" in the new year. I have a confession for your ears only! Do you promise not to tell another soul?   ;) Here it is - I was in love with Alexander and Hephaestion long before Jack and Ennis emerged from the brilliant imagination of Annie Proulx. Doen't mean I love Jack and Ennis any less. They're all tragic, star-crossed lovers who died young - except Ennis that is! Makes me so sad to think of that lonesome trailer he ended up in?  :'(

LOL

Kerry

well, I didn't know anything about Alexander...and The Persian Boy was the first of her novels I read....you have no idea how upset I was when he died!! Just a tear jerker! it DID feel so much like BBM!!

{{{{Kerry}}}}

I just met you but I already think of you as an old friend!!

Happy New Year!!

XX

(where do you live, Kerry? I am in Texas)
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on December 31, 2006, 03:03:24 am
well, I didn't know anything about Alexander...and The Persian Boy was the first of her novels I read....you have no idea how upset I was when he died!! Just a tear jerker! it DID feel so much like BBM!!

{{{{Kerry}}}}

I just met you but I already think of you as an old friend!!

Happy New Year!!

XX

(where do you live, Kerry? I am in Texas)

I'm in Sydney, Australia. That's a looooong way from Texas! Are you anywhere near Childress?!

Happy New Year!!!

(logging-off now)

Kerry
Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 01, 2007, 07:43:31 am
now see I don't think it was that big a drought for old Hephaistion...at least in The Persian Boy Bagoas commented that he was often left in camp while they went off on campaign...

and we all know how you men are when you get out in the woods in a tent!!

Cute observation! Funny but also very poignant.  :)

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 01, 2007, 07:47:38 am
“The Charioteer” is a novel by Mary Renault. Here’s the blurb from the dust jacket of the Harcourt Brace & Co. edition:

Few events in his early years had prepared Laurie Odell for the day in the veterans’ hospital when he first met Andrew Raynes. Laurie, who was recovering from wounds sustained at Dunkirk, had seen a bit of life, but the moment he met Andrew was unique for him - it was a moment that provided clarity and logic for the many things that he vaguely knew about himself but had never fully understood. With Andrew everything became right - love entered Laurie’s life and with it, finally, a sense of self. But with this discovery began Laurie’s difficult journey between two communities - that of the soldier and that of the gay man - and the delicate task of navigating the precarious waters that flow between them. In “The Charioteer,” Ms Renault has created a stunning work of historical fiction that is as fresh as today’s headlines. This is a novel that thoroughly succeeds in illuminating the world around us.

It’s a beautiful story; well worth a read.

Enjoy.

Kerry  ;D

Title: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 08:00:22 am
I don't think we have the Charioteer?? Something to look forward to. I went spelunking in my son's room and located "The Last of the Wine" "Fire From Heaven" and "The Nature of Alexander" now we are still missing the Theseus series...

Do you remember the Corinthian bull dancer from 'The King Must Die'? I always wished he had had his own story...he was fascinating to me...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Jeff Wrangler on January 01, 2007, 01:06:59 pm
Good heavens! How did I miss this thread?  :D

It's been years since I last reread any of Mary Renault's books, but they occupy an honored place on my bookshelf--and I'm constantly on the lookout to replace much-worn paperbacks with hardback editions.

Fire from Heaven is lovely, but if I could only take one of her books with me to a desert island, it would probably be The King Must Die. I was very taken with the idea of imagining what might plausibly have been the history that gave rise to the myths.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 01:17:18 pm
well you didn't really miss it...we started off in another thread I started this weekend "Favorite Lines from books and movies" and we were having such a great time talking about her books I spilt the topic this morning!

so welcome aboard...

she DID take so many little stories out of history and wrote them so well, you feel that YES that right there HAD to have been how it happened...

in 'The Praise Singer" she told the story of Harmodios and Aristigieton...and made my heart break for them..

I love how she worked her way from antiquity up thru Alexanders life and each book has it's own flavor..just SUCH a talented author...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Front-Ranger on January 01, 2007, 03:10:26 pm
For my first Mary Renault book, can you recommend one? I'd love to read and discuss. Shall we have a poll?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 03:31:06 pm
The Last of the Wine!!  ;)

or you can do a poll; I had thought that reading them in the order of the dates of the novels would be best...and if you did that The King Must Die would be the first...

in order by the dates of the events in each

The King Must Die - Theseus
The Bull From the Sea - a continuation of The King Must die
The Praise Singer - Aristigieton and Harmodias
The Last of the Wine - Socrates and the Spartan war
The Mask of Apollo - Plato
Fire From Heaven - Alexander the Great's childhood to ascension
The Persian Boy - Alexander's reign
Funeral Games - events immediately following his death

and she has a novel set during World War 1 "The Charioteer"
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Jeff Wrangler on January 01, 2007, 04:01:22 pm
The Last of the Wine!!  ;)

or you can do a poll; I had thought that reading them in the order of the dates of the novels would be best...and if you did that The King Must Die would be the first...

in order by the dates of the events in each

The King Must Die - Theseus
The Bull From the Sea - a continuation of The King Must die
The Praise Singer - Aristigieton and Harmodias
The Last of the Wine - Socrates and the Spartan war
The Mask of Apollo - Plato
Fire From Heaven - Alexander the Great's childhood to ascension
The Persian Boy - Alexander's reign
Funeral Games - events immediately following his death

and she has a novel set during World War 1 "The Charioteer"

Tell you what, as fond as I am of The King Must Die, I'm going to second Jess's recommendation for The Last of the Wine.  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 04:14:12 pm
It is a very special story isn't it? that scene in the mountains when Alexis has run away from home and the old priest shows him the statue in the temple....

brings me to tears to think of it...and so true...there is no name for that pain in our language but we all recognise it..
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Jeff Wrangler on January 01, 2007, 04:55:29 pm
It is a very special story isn't it? that scene in the mountains when Alexis has run away from home and the old priest shows him the statue in the temple....

brings me to tears to think of it...and so true...there is no name for that pain in our language but we all recognise it..

Indeed. And no intent to be a smart-aleck, but thinking of The Last of Wine reminds me of: "Can't please my old man no how."
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 06:39:22 pm
LOL!!

That line where he was saying he couldn't wait to introduce Lysis to his father "Here was one thing of mine with which he would find no fault"
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 06:43:40 pm
There are SO many great scenes in that book...the more I think about it...

Lee how long will it take you to get a copy and read it??!! LOL!!

the scene where Lysis sees Alexis for the first time...
the one where Alexis runs into Socrates while fleeing a suitor..
oh! the one where Socrates faces down Kritos...*whew*

I love in all her books how she casually drops in figures from all the tales like in this book she has Agathon...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 01, 2007, 10:07:15 pm
For my first Mary Renault book, can you recommend one? I'd love to read and discuss. Shall we have a poll?

A big thank you to Injest for creating this wonderful new thread. I first discovered Mary Renault some 30 years ago and have read many of her books over the years. However, having said that, it has been some years since last I did so (except for "The Persian Boy," which I re-read often - it's my favourite). I'm going to have to dust off my old editions, in order to keep-up with y'all erudite Renault scholars! I have a feeling there'll be lots of fun to be had in the process - sharing with you guys. Thank you again, Injest.

Kerry

P.S., Front-Ranger, if you've not read Renault before, I suggest you start with "The Persian Boy." It can happily be read out of sequence. Alternatively, you could read the entire Alexander trilogy in sequence.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 01, 2007, 10:20:54 pm
The Persian Boy was my first one too...we have developed a passion for used book stores...and D can spot a gay novel at twenty paces!  :laugh:

I am trying to get all hard backs of her books...and my pride and joy are four first editions!

no you can't go wrong with any of her books...The Persian Boy and The Last of the Wine have so many layers and such depth....

we really Do have to settle on a particular one and work our way down...

Lee since you are the newest and haven't read any...tell us which you want to do first!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 01, 2007, 11:52:51 pm
I am trying to get all hard backs of her books...and my pride and joy are four first editions!

 :o  Wow! Four first editions! You ARE serious! LOL  :laugh:

Kerry   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 02, 2007, 12:01:05 am
well I know I could probably order a hardback of each of them...but that would kinda be cheating...and we enjoying prowling around used books stores..
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 02, 2007, 06:42:35 am
well I know I could probably order a hardback of each of them...but that would kinda be cheating...and we enjoying prowling around used books stores..

 A noble pursuit. Enjoy!  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 02, 2007, 08:38:06 am
:o  TOOT-TOOT-TE-TOOT!   :o

(that's as close as I can get to a fanfare - to gain your attention LOL) 

A fanfare is appropriate, because I believe the following quote from Mary Renault's "Fire from Heaven" has particular relevance and poignancy for all of us here at this site:

"As we know, the ashes of Achilles and Patroclus were mingled in one urn. Not even a god could sift the one from the other."

I previously quoted Plutarch's account of Alexander and Hephaestion's visit to Troy, where Alexander laid a wreath on Achilles’ tomb, and Hephaestion on Patroclus.’ It was openly accepted in classical Greece that Achilles and Patroclus had been lovers, and Alexander and Hephaestion were making a very public statement of their own love for and commitment to each other, when they laid their wreaths at Troy. It is my belief that their men would have known exactly what they were saying in this action.

But I digress. Why should this quote have such particular relevance for us here? Because I think it would be wonderful for the ashes of Jack and Ennis to be so mingled and scattered on Brokeback Mountain. Surely, if ever there were two star-crossed lovers who deserve to be so united for all eternity, it is our own dear beloved Jack and Ennis.

Kerry   :'(
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 02, 2007, 09:39:58 am
very nice post, Kerry

there were so many male couples back in antiquity. The concept was much more acceptable in those days. Women were so isolated that the idea of friendship was mostly male/male...women were for kids.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Jeff Wrangler on January 02, 2007, 10:43:34 am
very nice post, Kerry

there were so many male couples back in antiquity. The concept was much more acceptable in those days. 

Sure. Sparta--I think it was Sparta--had an entire military unit made up of male couples. I think the idea had something to do with the notion that they would fight better in pursuit of honor and glory because they wouldn't want to shame each other, or be ashamed in front of each other.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Front-Ranger on January 02, 2007, 11:05:21 am
I am planning on picking up The Last of the Wine on my way home from Work today and starting it tonite.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 02, 2007, 08:23:47 pm
I guess if we'd been a fly on the wall, way back there in Persia, we may very well have overheard Hephaestion say to Alexander, "I can't make it on a couple of high-altitude fucks once or twice a year."  :o  LOL

Kerry   ;)


 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 02, 2007, 08:32:37 pm
When we look back at the ancient world, it is very important to remember that it is an era that existed long before our present Christian era, with all its moral hang-ups and prudery. Alexander, Hephaestion and Bagoas were men of their times, not ours. As for Bagoas being a "boy," it is my understanding that he was a "youth" when he met Alexander, not a child.

Someone's already pointed this out, but Bagoas was 16 at the time of the book, a teenager, but still considered a boy.  In the book, Bagoas himself uses the term for lover and beloved.  The Beloved being the 'boy'.  When he first sees Hephaestion and Alexander interact, he's surprised Alexander is already someone's 'boy'.

Quote
I can find no evidence that Alexander had any relationships with "boys." In this, he was proudly Macedonian, not Athenian!

Well, so was Phillip and he was famous for his relationships with boys.  I forgot where I read about Alexander and his favorite page.  The writer was speaking of Alexander's boy comparing unfavorably with Hephaestion.  It may come from a legitimate source or from pseudo-Callisthenes, I don't remember.  I'll have to paw through every source material I have on Alexander to find it again.  I went through a huge Alexander phase when the movie came out, and I read a bunch of books on him and even went so far as to order this professor's dissertation on Hephaestion.

Quote
Alexander was the King. He did it "because he could." It's that simple! Hephaestion would have known and understood this, and loved Alexander no less because of it.

Ah, it's good to be king.  Certainly Hephaestion understood it and probably didn't love Alexander any less for it, but that doesn't mean he liked it.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 02, 2007, 09:22:36 pm
Someone's already pointed this out, but Bagoas was 16 at the time of the book, a teenager, but still considered a boy.  In the book, Bagoas himself uses the term for lover and beloved.  The Beloved being the 'boy'.  When he first sees Hephaestion and Alexander interact, he's surprised Alexander is already someone's 'boy'.
As you say, "Bagoas was 16 at the time of the book." Nuff said.

Renault's Bagoas is wrong when he presumes that Alexander was Hepaestion's boy. Alexander was never anyone's boy, except maybe Olympias! (LOL). I will write more on this when I've had an opportunity to consult the sources (I'm presently at work).
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 02, 2007, 09:33:50 pm
Well, so was Phillip and he was famous for his relationships with boys.  I forgot where I read about Alexander and his favorite page.  The writer was speaking of Alexander's boy comparing unfavorably with Hephaestion.  It may come from a legitimate source or from pseudo-Callisthenes, I don't remember.  I'll have to paw through every source material I have on Alexander to find it again.  I went through a huge Alexander phase when the movie came out, and I read a bunch of books on him and even went so far as to order this professor's dissertation on Hephaestion.
Alexander and Philip did not enjoy a loving father/son relationship. They didn't have a lot in common, from what I can see.

Let's remember that the pages you refer to were not the little girly boys with page-boy haircuts of fairytale fame. These pages were tough young louts, hardened by years on campaign. They were not delicate in any way. And they were young men - not boys.

With respect, steer clear of Alexander according to Oliver Stone (LOL). Though, having said that, I did enjoy the movie - but strictly as a confection.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 02, 2007, 09:42:04 pm
Ah, it's good to be king.  Certainly Hephaestion understood it and probably didn't love Alexander any less for it, but that doesn't mean he liked it.
It is my personal belief that Hephaestion never ceased loving Alexander. Just like Jack never ceased loving Ennis.   :'(
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 02, 2007, 11:00:05 pm
Alexander and Philip did not enjoy a loving father/son relationship. They didn't have a lot in common, from what I can see.

Well, that's not surprising seeing as how Phillip was away a lot on campaign.  Alexander was very likely his mother's son more than he was his father's.

Quote
Let's remember that the pages you refer to were not the little girly boys with page-boy haircuts of fairytale fame. These pages were tough young louts, hardened by years on campaign. They were not delicate in any way. And they were young men - not boys.

As I recall reading, the pages were under the age of 18.  At about 18 or so, they went into the army.  So yes, they were at times, boys.

Quote
With respect, steer clear of Alexander according to Oliver Stone (LOL). Though, having said that, I did enjoy the movie - but strictly as a confection.

Actually except for the psychological angle of Alexander in the movie which was pure conjecture, Stone was extremely accurate in his movie almost to a fault. 
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 02, 2007, 11:11:29 pm
Actually except for the psychological angle of Alexander in the movie which was pure conjecture, Stone was extremely accurate in his movie almost to a fault. 
Now that's what I call a page-boy hair-do - on Alexander!  :o  Ugh!  ::)

There was a joke going around at the time:

"Hey, have you heard that Alexander the Great was a homosexual? And IRISH!!!"  :laugh:
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 02, 2007, 11:31:20 pm
Now that's what I call a page-boy hair-do - on Alexander!  :o  Ugh!  ::)

There was a joke going around at the time:

"Hey, have you heard that Alexander the Great was a homosexual? And IRISH!!!  :laugh:


   :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Yeah, I dunno what the deal was with the wig.  Wasn't Alexander the Great's hair supposed to be a 'tawny' color?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 03, 2007, 02:20:37 am
Well, that's not surprising seeing as how Phillip was away a lot on campaign.  Alexander was very likely his mother's son more than he was his father's.

As I recall reading, the pages were under the age of 18.  At about 18 or so, they went into the army.  So yes, they were at times, boys.

Actually except for the psychological angle of Alexander in the movie which was pure conjecture, Stone was extremely accurate in his movie almost to a fault. 

remember that in this time the idea of childhood was much different than ours...girls were married between 13 and 16...any older and her prospects were dim...

on what are you basing your definition of boy? yes, Alexanders pages moved into the Companions when they turned 18....that doesn't mean that other teens weren't serving already in the reg regiments...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 03, 2007, 09:02:26 am
on what are you basing your definition of boy? yes, Alexanders pages moved into the Companions when they turned 18....that doesn't mean that other teens weren't serving already in the reg regiments...

Age I suppose.  R.L. Fox in his 'Alexander the Great' bio states that the boys of royalty/nobility came to the Macedonian court at 14 to be educated and serve as Royal Pages.  So even if other teens were serving in regular regiments, at what age they became or were considered 'men' is debatable.  What does stand out though is that Phillip and possibly Alexander too had intimate relations with their Pages and those were all under the age of 18.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 03, 2007, 07:18:37 pm
I think we are getting far from the original intent of this thread...which is to discuss the books. I understand and accept you are not a fan of Ms. Renault. So I will no longer engage you on this point....

moving on...

I understand that Lee is beginning to read The Last of The Wine...Kerry, do you have a copy? Can we discuss the first chapter?

Lee, are you ready or shall we give you a bit more time?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Front-Ranger on January 03, 2007, 07:57:23 pm
I went two places to find it yesterday. There were lots of Renault books but not that one. I'll try again tonite, but if I can't find it, then I will order it on Amazon.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 03, 2007, 08:11:12 pm
sounds good!! (you might have the best luck at a used book store if there is one handy)

It is one of the greatest feelings to find an author that really just grabs you. I feel like I have always known these characters and places...I have read other authors...Graves, Taylor...but none have caught me like these books have...I have always been fascinated with ancient history...used to read everything I could find on Egypt...

I can't believe it took me this long to find her!  :laugh: :laugh:

I think I have reread every one of them at least four or five times...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 03, 2007, 08:21:38 pm
I understand that Lee is beginning to read The Last of The Wine...Kerry, do you have a copy? Can we discuss the first chapter?

Lee, are you ready or shall we give you a bit more time?

Will check at home tonight (presently at work - it's 11.15am Thursday here).

Looking forward to our Mary Renault Book Club discussions! Exciting!

Kerry   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 03, 2007, 08:27:31 pm
I think we are getting far from the original intent of this thread...which is to discuss the books. I understand and accept you are not a fan of Ms. Renault. So I will no longer engage you on this point....

Where did you get this idea?  ??? ???

I loved her 'Fire from Heaven' and "Nature of Alexander', just not 'The Persian Boy'.

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 03, 2007, 08:31:10 pm
I went two places to find it yesterday. There were lots of Renault books but not that one. I'll try again tonite, but if I can't find it, then I will order it on Amazon.
Do you have a gay book shop where you live? I live in Sydney's gay ghetto and there's an excellent gay book shop here. It has the most wonderful selection of novels, biographies, auto-biographies, diaries, stationery, calendars, etc. It's a wonderful place to visit and browse through. If you have something similar where you live, they're sure to have it.

Kerry
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Front-Ranger on January 03, 2007, 08:55:05 pm
Surely there is one...I will check. Thanks for the suggestion!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Jeff Wrangler on January 03, 2007, 11:25:05 pm
I loved her 'Fire from Heaven' and "Nature of Alexander', just not 'The Persian Boy'.

The Persian Boy wasn't one of my favorites either. Why I recommended The Last of the Wine.  :-\
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 04, 2007, 12:28:26 am
"Listen, and do not forget, and I will show you a mystery. It is not the sacrifice, whether it comes in youth or age, or the god remits it; it is not the bloodletting that calls down power. It is the consenting, Theseus. The readiness is all. It washes heart and mind from things of no account, and leaves them open to the god. But one washing does not last a lifetime: we must renew it, or the dust returns to cover us. And so with this. Twenty years I have ruled in Troizen, and four times sent the King Horse to Posiedon. When I lay my hand on his head to make him nod, it is not only to bless the people with the omen. I greet him as my brother before the god, and renew my moira."

"The King Must Die"
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: delalluvia on January 04, 2007, 01:14:32 am
The Persian Boy wasn't one of my favorites either. Why I recommended The Last of the Wine.  :-\

Thanks,  :)  I'll give it a shot.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 04, 2007, 01:50:20 am
Just found the following blurb on the Net re "Friendly Young Ladies," by May Renault. Never knew it existed until just now. Sounds like a fun read:

"Elsie, sheltered and naive, is seventeen and unhappy. Stifled by life with her bickering parents in a bleak Cornish village, she falls in love with the first presentable young man she meets -- Peter, an an ambitious London doctor. On his advice she runs away from home and goes to live with her sister Leonora, who escaped eight years earlier. But there are surprises in store for conventional Elsie as her sister has a rather bohemian lifestyle: not only does Leo live in a houseboat on the Thames where she writes Westerns for a living, she shares her boat, and her bed, with the lovely Helen. When Peter pays this strange menage a visit, turning his attention from one 'friendly' young lady to the next, he disturbs the calm for each of them -- with results unforeseen by all ...Mary Renault wrote this delightfully provocative novel in 1943 partly in answer to the despair characteristic of Radclyffe Hall's the Well of Loneliness. The result is this witty and stylish social comedy."

First read Radclyffe Hall's immortal "Well of Loneliness" some 40 years ago, and loved it (my Mum had read it before me! LOL). Not exactly a jolly read!

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 04, 2007, 02:00:28 am
?? I had never heard of it either?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 04, 2007, 08:01:00 am
I sit here with my copy of “The Last of the Wine,” in eager anticipation of lively discussion to follow. What modus operandi should we adopt for our little book club? Should we discuss one chapter at a time? Though there are 28 chapters, they are each relatively short, yet jam-packed with lots of potentially exciting discussion-fodder. As I write this, you guys are fast asleep in bed. Should I start the ball rolling? OK then, here we go!

If I have read “The Last of the Wine” previously, it must have been many, many years ago, because as I read chapter 1 tonight, nothing sounded familiar to me. And as a result, I was not at all prepared for the jarring emotional reaction I experienced, just half-way through page 2. I literally found myself bawling like a baby. Crying out loud. I’ve not had a reaction like that since my first reading of Brokeback Mountain. Here are the two paragraphs that knocked me for six:

“On the day of my birth, my father’s younger brother, Alexias, died in his twenty-fourth year. He, hearing that a youth called Philon, with whom he was in love, had been taken sick (with the plague), went at once to him; meeting, I have been told, not only the slaves  but the boy’s own sister, running the other way. His father and mother had already perished; Alexias found the lad alone, lying in the basin of the courtyard fountain, where he had crawled to cool his fever. He had not called out to anyone to fetch his friend, not wishing to endanger him; but some passers-by, who had not cared to go very near, reported that they had seen Alexias carrying him indoors.

This reached my father after some time, while my mother was in labour with me. He sent over a reliable servant who had had the plague already; who, however, found both the young men dead. From the way they were lying, it seems that in the hour of Philon’s death, Alexias had felt himself sicken; and, knowing the end, had taken hemlock, so that they should make the journey together. The cup was standing on the floor beside him; he had tipped out the dregs, and written PHILON with his finger, as one does after supper in the last of the wine.”

I am literally speechless . . .

“. . . so that they should make the journey together.”

This has such timely relevance for us; we, who are also living at a time when plague is at large in the land.

Emotional ramifications for Alexias, the narrator, with the weight of this tragic legacy to bear, from his very first day of life?

“. . . and written PHILON with his finger. . .”

Comments on chapter 1?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 04, 2007, 09:22:13 am
Alexias had SO much to live up to in his life...truly as someone said "He couldn't satisfy his father no how." How can you live up to that? To that legend that holds such a place in his father's heart? It is impossible to defeat a dead person...

And to know growing up that you weren't wanted. NOTHING takes that back. What does that do to a person?

The first line really catches me…

When I was a young boy, if I was sick or in trouble, or had been beaten at school, I used to remember that on the day I was born my father wanted to kill me.

Everything he did in his life was colored by that thought….that he was not wanted. And the belief that he was not loved (although I think his father did….he just didn’t know how to show it)

The story of Alexias (the uncle) and Philon  touches me so much…even the way it is presented…not as a ‘gay’ thing…just a normal accepted even admired relationship. And the nobility and love they showed….Philon didn’t call for Alexias…wanting to protect him, and I wonder if Alexias really felt himself getting sick or did he just love Philon so much he couldn’t bear for him to go on that journey alone?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Front-Ranger on January 04, 2007, 06:32:08 pm
You guys go ahead...I went out at lunchtime to another bookstore but they still did not have it. I bought the only MR book they had (The King Must Die) and ordered Last of the Wine. I'll catch up with you next week when it arrives.

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 04, 2007, 07:51:29 pm
I see the enormity of the events of Alexias’ birth date as being a double-edged sword.

He was born one month premature and, as such, was not a robust, attractive baby – definitely a runt. As a consequence, his father intended to expose him on a hillside, for the wolves to devour. Imagine having to carry that with you for the rest of your life! I’m getting mixed feelings about the father. Certainly, there is that John Twist aspect to his personality (urinating on your infant son must be right up there in the “despicable acts” stakes, with exposing your baby son); however, having said that, I get the feeling that his heart wasn’t really in it. Certainly, he was called away to war before he could act, but he could have easily left instruction for the deed to be done. He didn’t do this. One could argue that the reason he ultimately decided not to expose his son was a selfish one – it was better to have a runt son than no son at all, seeing as his wife and other son had subsequently died of the plague – “. . . (my father) thought it less disgraceful to leave even me behind him, than to perish without offspring as if he had never been.” And then the wet-nurse fattened him up, and he was stronger and better looking and “. . . (my father) named me Alexias, as he had first meant to do.” So, even though daddy was a brute, he came to accept his son.

His mother did not have that opportunity. She was dead from the plague when he was only days old. Whereas his father did come to accept him, he must live the rest of his life believing that his mother went to her grave disowning him – “From the first she had ordered me to be kept away from her.”

And of course, we also have the fact that he was born in a time a plague, when his mother, brother, Uncle Alexias and god knows how many other family members died. Gotta be a bad omen for any new baby’s birth! And coupled with this, the tragic circumstances of his uncle’s death, in the arms of his lover.

I believe this latter event, though tragic, is the positive, inspirational aspect of the double-edged sword. His uncle gave up his life to be with the man he loved, to “. . . make the journey together.” His father wanted to respectfully mix the ashes of the lovers together. This was not to be, their bodies having already been disposed of on a common pyre in the street.

We are told that, “. . . my grandfather had a stone set up for Alexias in the Street of Tombs, with a relief showing the friends clasping hands in farewell, and a cup beside them on a pedestal. Every year at the Feast of Families, we sacrificed for Alexias at the household altar, and the story is one of the first that I remember. My father used to say that all over the City, those who died in the plague were the beautiful and the good.” (so, maybe he wasn’t such an old rotter after all – time will tell!)

Importantly, “. . . the story (of Alexias and Philon) is one of the first that I remember,” indicates to me that despite the premature runt status, the loathing of his father and mother, the loss of his mother and brother, the plague and the war (gasp!), he carries the inspirational legacy, that his namesake tragically and nobly died, honourably and with dignity, in the arms of the man he loved.

The story of Alexias (the uncle) and Philon  touches me so much…even the way it is presented…not as a ‘gay’ thing…just a normal accepted even admired relationship. And the nobility and love they showed….Philon didn’t call for Alexias…wanting to protect him, and I wonder if Alexias really felt himself getting sick or did he just love Philon so much he couldn’t bear for him to go on that journey alone?

Beautifully expressed, Jess. I too was touched that Philon chose to not call for Alexias, because he wanted to protect him. And I also wondered about Alexias getting sick. My romantic heart tells me he wanted to be with his beloved, Philon, on that long, long journey.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 04, 2007, 08:01:15 pm
now see I do NOT see Alexias's mother like that at all!!

I took that passage to mean that when she felt herself sicken is when she ordered him away...remember she pleaded for his life...

"....the midwife had handed me over to my mother to nurse. This annoyed my father; for she had taken a fancy to me after this, as women will, and being rather weak and feverish begged for my life with tears..."

it is very interesting to see how Alexias (the narrator of the story talks about the situation with an almost clinical, detached air)

Also interesting to see the attitude toward women...we are viewed as having little sense at all!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 04, 2007, 08:05:14 pm
His father is presented as a very stern, proper man; wealthy and respected...but also a bit soft hearted...remember that in this time it was pretty common to expose unwanted or unhealthy infants...(as it is still in some countries) He wouldn't take Alexias from his mother's arms by force (he could have easily) and did not order anyone else to do it...which leads me to think that maybe he was 'going thru the motions'

note in the last paragraph that he was fond of Alexias's mother...must have been a horrible time for him too...losing so much...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 04, 2007, 08:07:55 pm
MR writing is similar to me to Proulx's in that she packs a lot of stuff in a few words...every word she writes counts...nothing wasted...and leaves you wanting to know more...your mind filling in the blanks...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 04, 2007, 08:30:15 pm
now see I do NOT see Alexias's mother like that at all!!

I took that passage to mean that when she felt herself sicken is when she ordered him away...remember she pleaded for his life...

"....the midwife had handed me over to my mother to nurse. This annoyed my father; for she had taken a fancy to me after this, as women will, and being rather weak and feverish begged for my life with tears..."

it is very interesting to see how Alexias (the narrator of the story talks about the situation with an almost clinical, detached air)

Also interesting to see the attitude toward women...we are viewed as having little sense at all!

Gad! I missed that completely! Read it several times and somehow got the idea that it was the nurse begging for his life - and that the mother was an ogre! I'm now viewing the mother in a whole new light. Thanx  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 04, 2007, 08:39:35 pm
His father is presented as a very stern, proper man; wealthy and respected...but also a bit soft hearted...remember that in this time it was pretty common to expose unwanted or unhealthy infants...(as it is still in some countries) He wouldn't take Alexias from his mother's arms by force (he could have easily) and did not order anyone else to do it...which leads me to think that maybe he was 'going thru the motions'

note in the last paragraph that he was fond of Alexias's mother...must have been a horrible time for him too...losing so much...

I agree. In Australia, we call such a person a "rough diamond" (eluding to an uncut diamond - rough of the outside but with the potential for beauty/greatness underneath). I laughed at the line about the father being "fond" of his wife. The implication being, for me, that he didn't love her - was just fond of her. Your thoughts?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 04, 2007, 08:48:14 pm
You guys go ahead...I went out at lunchtime to another bookstore but they still did not have it. I bought the only MR book they had (The King Must Die) and ordered Last of the Wine. I'll catch up with you next week when it arrives.

I've made an Adobe Acrobat PDF copy of the first 3 chapters but don't know how to attach items here at BetterMost (it's so tricky - I can't work it out here!). However, I can e-mail it to you. What's your e-mail address? If you don't want to quote it in the open forum, send me a private message via my profile. You will need to have Adobe Acrobat Reader on your PC - it's free.

Cheers,

Kerry
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 05, 2007, 02:03:56 am
I agree. In Australia, we call such a person a "rough diamond" (eluding to an uncut diamond - rough of the outside but with the potential for beauty/greatness underneath). I laughed at the line about the father being "fond" of his wife. The implication being, for me, that he didn't love her - was just fond of her. Your thoughts?

well it is difficult for me to explain...(I just read it recently and it is hard to divorce information that comes later...) BUT if you look at the general attitude toward women...the patronizing tone...the dismissing of their opinions...together with the knowledge that in those days men considered women to be for begetting children only...fond is about the best you can expect...you will see as we get further in the book...can we revisit this later?

interesting too (to me) is the aside MR throws in about the source of the plague....the WOMEN blame (correctly) the contaminated water supply while the vastly 'superior' men assume it is a curse from the gods for some imagined sin....and laugh at the women...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 05, 2007, 07:24:18 am
well it is difficult for me to explain...(I just read it recently and it is hard to divorce information that comes later...) BUT if you look at the general attitude toward women...the patronizing tone...the dismissing of their opinions...together with the knowledge that in those days men considered women to be for begetting children only...fond is about the best you can expect...you will see as we get further in the book...can we revisit this later?

interesting too (to me) is the aside MR throws in about the source of the plague....the WOMEN blame (correctly) the contaminated water supply while the vastly 'superior' men assume it is a curse from the gods for some imagined sin....and laugh at the women...

I couldn't help but notice how readily and without hesitation MR used the "love" word on page 2, when describing what Alexias (uncle) felt for Philon, but could only manage "fond of" for what his (narrator's) father felt for his mother. I have no doubt that MR used these words deliberately, in such close proximity. It's something that's crossed my mind in the past, when reading MR. And I have come to the conclusion that this reflects MRs accuracy and honesty in truthfully portraying and recreating the ancient world. I understand she was an obsessive researcher. What you read in her books, apparently, is very close to the way it was. It would have been very easy for her to have deliberately misrepresented the ancient world and given women a more illustrious persona. But it wouldn't have been accurate. Must have broken her heart at times, being an educated, erudite gay woman herself, with a professional career of her own before taking up writing (she was a registered nurse). I have sometimes wondered why, as a lesbian, she didn't write books about the powerful women from antiquity. For example, there's Sappho, Olympias, Dido, Helen of Troy and the Delphic Sibyl, just to name a few off the top of my head, that would all make wonderful books. Wonder why she was so obsessed with gay male characters. Something to ponder and muse over.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 05, 2007, 10:49:35 pm

I know that a lot of women see men as having all the power...maybe that is why...you know this is the first time I have noticed those little digs about women??

on to chapter 2??
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 06, 2007, 07:32:16 am
interesting too (to me) is the aside MR throws in about the source of the plague....the WOMEN blame (correctly) the contaminated water supply while the vastly 'superior' men assume it is a curse from the gods for some imagined sin....and laugh at the women...

I can't find a reference to the women blaming the contaminated water supply; rather, they blamed the country people for bringing a "curse":

"Some said the Spartans had called on Far-Shooting Apollo, some that they had contrived to poison the springs. Some of the women, I believe, blamed the country people for bringing in a curse; as if anyone could reasonably suppose that the gods would punish a state for treating its own citizens justly. But women, being ignorant of philosophy and logic, and fearing dream-diviners more than immortal Zeus, will always suppose that whatever causes them trouble must be wicked."

Fact is, we don't know what this "plague" was. Could be any one of a number of maladies. The only description we get from the text is that both Philon and the narrator's mother were feverish and the father was left with a "bloody flux." My dictionary defines a "flux" as a, "morbid discharge of blood, excrement, etc." Let's presume it was probably either cholera or bubonic plague.

Cholera is spread through contaminated water and is a bilious disorder with diarrhoea and vomiting. I imagine symptoms would include fever and a "bloody flux."

Symptoms of the septicemic form of bubonic plague  include bleeding into the skin and other organs. Could this be interpreted as a "bloody flux"? I guess so. It's probable that you'd have a fever too. Bubonic plague is largely spread via the fleas on rats.

Could have been either, but I'm putting my money on bubonic plague. It is stated that the country folk who flocked to the city for safety, "lived like beasts" in "stinking huts." Not exactly a hygienic environment. It's likely they brought flea infested rats with them.

I read this as MR saying the women were correct, in a back-handed kinda way, in that they did rightly blame the country people for the plague. However, they were wrong in presuming that it was as a result of a curse they brought in.

Your thoughts?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 06, 2007, 09:16:52 am
OW!! MY bad!! Didn't go back and verify before I wrote... :laugh:

you are right of course....the source of the plague is never clear in The Last of the Wine...

I do think MR was doing as you say...doing a back hand insinuation that the women knew the truth (even if for the wrong reason)

interesting to me that Alexias does not say that women didn't have enough sense to understand logic and philosophy but that they were ignorant of them..interesting choice of words..
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 06, 2007, 11:38:29 pm
interesting to me that Alexias does not say that women didn't have enough sense to understand logic and philosophy but that they were ignorant of them..interesting choice of words..

From what I understand, "Immortal Zeus" is the equivalent of our "Lord Jesus" today. By that, I mean that He represents the formal state religion of the day and it was considered to be sacrilegious and heretical to speak against the Gods.  :o

To use our own time as an example, I think MR is saying that the women are more inclined to be into exciting New Age philosophy, rather than attending staid old Sunday Mass!

Personally, I'd prefer to browse through a New Age store any day.  :laugh:  Sunday Mass? Been there, done that!  :-\

I'm with the women on this score!  ;)

I'm ready for chapter 2 when you are. Would you like to begin?  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 06, 2007, 11:55:34 pm
Chapter 2!!

and the introduction of the evil stepmother and SOCRATES!!

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 07, 2007, 12:14:00 am
there is a lovely scene in this chapter of the relationship between Alexias and his father...Alexias has struck a slave and his father walks in.

He tells Alexias to bring him his shield. Alexisa can not lift it...and this is what his father tells him:


"When you are man enough to carry a shield, you will learn how it happens that men are sold into slavery, and their children born in it. Till then, it is enough for you to know that Amasis and the rest are slaves, not through any merit of yours, but by the destiny of the heaven." 

I think of classes we have today....whenever someone sneers at poor people or minorities or gays...it is their destiny...they don't choose to be that way..
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 07, 2007, 07:17:36 am
Before progressing to chapter 2, there are a couple of additional quotes from chapter 1, that I believe warrant comment:

“And it is seldom a man can say, either of the Spartans or the plague, that he owes them life instead of death.”   We have already spent a lot of time discussing how awful it must have been for Alexias to have suffered under the weight of all the bad omens happening at the time of his birth. I was dwelling so much on the negative that I missed this little gem. And it seems to me that here Alexias is saying that he views the Spartans and the plague as a positive, not a negative at all. For without them (to distract his father), he would surely have died. In this, he is quite right.

“But women . . . will always suppose that whatever causes them trouble must be wicked.”  Absolutely priceless! And not a fault solely relegated to women, surely! How many times in life have we been hurt by benevolent forces? Not wicked in the least. Here be wisdom, indeed.

“My grandfather had a stone set up  . . . showing the friends clasping hands in farewell, and a cup beside them on a pedestal.”  I am presuming here that this is the cup of hemlock. If so, it is clear that suicide was not viewed as a disgrace in ancient Athens.

“My mother having brought me forth nearly a month too soon, either through a weakness of her body or the foreknowledge of a god.”  How did I miss this gem on first reading? Of course, if it had been a full term pregnancy, Alexias’ mother would have died when she was eight months pregnant and he would never have been born. Ergo, his premature, runt status was a blessing “of a god”, not a curse after all.

MR is soooo deep!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 07, 2007, 08:07:57 am
there is a lovely scene in this chapter of the relationship between Alexias and his father...Alexias has struck a slave and his father walks in.

He tells Alexias to bring him his shield. Alexisa can not lift it...and this is what his father tells him:


"When you are man enough to carry a shield, you will learn how it happens that men are sold into slavery, and their children born in it. Till then, it is enough for you to know that Amasis and the rest are slaves, not through any merit of yours, but by the destiny of the heaven." 

I think of classes we have today....whenever someone sneers at poor people or minorities or gays...it is their destiny...they don't choose to be that way..

You have expressed this beautifully and I readily agree. To quote a line from Mart Crowley's "The Boys in the Band" (see thread under Our Daily Thoughts), "I've known what I was since I was four years old"  (attempt at levity LOL  ;D). Certainly, like the majority of gay people, I believe that one does not make a choice about one's sexuality. Just as one does not make a conscious choice to be black, white, yellow, whatever. I'm sure most straight people would agree that they did not sit down one day and decide whether to be heterosexual or not. And then again, if one believes in reincarnation, one can view these matters from an entirely different perspective. But I digress - it's late and my mind's wandering . . .   :-\

So, big bad daddy appears to have acquired some amount of wisdom. And he sounds cute, too! Bit of a stud, actually!  :P I did squirm a little when reading the very sexy description Alexias gives of his father. Sounded somewhat weirdly incestuous to me. I can't imagine ever writing about my father in these terms:

"I used to look at him and wonder how it felt to be beautiful. He was more than six feet tall, grey-eyed, brown-skinned, and golden-haired; made like those big Apollos Pheidias' workshop used to turn out" (i.e., stunning!!!)  :o

and this:

"It pleased me, however, to see him in his best blue mantle with the golden border, his brown chest and left shoulder bare, bathed and combed and rubbed down with sweet oil, his hair dressed into a garland and his beard short-pointed."

Very sexy imagery from a six year old, describing his father!  ;)

Is it me?




Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 07, 2007, 10:02:15 am
well remember this is Alexias at a much older age recalling his youth. and in Greece at that time, physical beauty was considered a virtue...it feels to me as envy and hero worship more.

I will have to remind you of this descriptiong later in the book. I think MR had a reason for it...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 07, 2007, 06:33:27 pm
Have you had any luck in obtaining the Sweetman biography of MR? She was  very progressive. Very ahead of her time. There's a photo of her in the book, taken at a Black Sash protest in 1955. The caption reads, "She was among the first to join this women's movement against apartheid."
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 08, 2007, 10:12:18 pm
no I haven't had a chance to get it...the biography..

I am interested at how this chapter depicts Alexias's father...as being a fair and just man but very distant and involved with his own affairs...he engaged a nurse and didn't seem to notice that his child was suffering...he held supper parties...I get the impression that his father is ambitious.

It is clear that Alexias views his father as a object of awe but not protection or solace...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 08, 2007, 11:39:54 pm
no I haven't had a chance to get it...the biography..

I am interested at how this chapter depicts Alexias's father...as being a fair and just man but very distant and involved with his own affairs...he engaged a nurse and didn't seem to notice that his child was suffering...he held supper parties...I get the impression that his father is ambitious.

It is clear that Alexias views his father as a object of awe but not protection or solace...

Ah, daddy dearest! Hubber-hubber! Be still my beating heart! I think I’m falling in love with this man! He is a very complex character - stunningly attractive, charming, gregarious, virile, ambitious and rich. A member of one of Athens’ founding families. A gentleman of rank – “Our family has been there, as they say, since the grasshoppers came.”  He owns a beautiful, colonnaded house near the Dipylon Gate, as well as rural holdings.  Alexias describes him as “beautiful,” likening him to a Pheidias Apollo – high praise, indeed! Alexias further comments that, “It pleased me . . . to see him.” I’ll join that queue! This man would have been a major catch for any woman – or man! Forgive my lechery tonight. This kinda guy does it to me every time! A brute with a soul! Sigh!

Like so many men of his, or any other generation, his commitments and responsibilities kept him away from the family home. And I’m not sure that I can blame him. There’s a manipulative, sadistic harpy of a “concubine” in residence, who he plans to ditch, and his son is behaving like a right little brat. He appears to be either unaware or disinterested about the torture being inflicted upon his son by the Rhodian (cite the incident re the kitten).

And yet he has high moral standards. I, too, love the lesson of the shield, where the father instructs Alexias to refrain from hubris, “which the Gods hate” (I’m sure he didn’t want the wrathful Nemesis descending upon his house!) and “behave yourself like a gentleman.” Alas, he then goes and negates all the good he’s taught by adding, “And if you forget this, I myself will beat you.”

I think this is an interesting use of words. Is the “myself” tautological here? Technically, yes. However, I think MR has deliberately used this device in order to imply that the father was aware his son was already being beaten by the mistress.  Without “myself” it is simply a direct threat. With “myself” it implies there’s someone else already beating him. Your thoughts on this?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 09, 2007, 12:29:14 am
I think children at that time were considered little savages that had to be reined in...and the idea of the nurse beating him is not a shocking one to his father. It gives me the impression that corporal punishment was an accepted part of childhood....remember in the first chapter Alexias said "when I had been beaten at school"

a far different time. they had a great many things to be proud of...but more and more I get the impression that childhood was a hard thing then...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 09, 2007, 07:37:33 pm
Historical point of reference:

Alexias says, “It is true that when I was born he (Pericles) was still alive, though already sick; which is no reason for foolish youths to ask me, as one did lately, whether I remember him.”

I understand from this that Alexias was a child when Pericles (“Perikles” in TLOTW) died in 429 BC.

* Pericles, 495-429 BC

* Alexander, 356-323 BC

MR is telling us here that Alexias lived in the time immediately following the Periclean Age and prior to the advent of Alexander.

Athens must have been a beautiful, exciting city to live in at that time. And what a wonderful word-picture MR paints of the place for us. In fact, I find it so beautiful, I’m compelled to quote it here:

“Our house stood in the Inner Kerameikos, not far from the Dipylon Gate. The courtyard had a little colonnade of painted columns, a fig-tree and a vine. At the back were the stables, where my father kept his two horses and a mule; it was easy to climb on the stable roof, and thence to the roof of the house.

The roof had a border of acanthus tiles, and was not very steep. If one straddled the ridge, one could see right over the City wall, past the gate-towers of the Dipylon to the Sacred Way, where it curves towards Eleusis between its garden and its tombs. In summer-time, I could pick out the funeral stele of my uncle Alexias and his friend, by the white oleander that grew there. Then I would turn south, to where the High City stands like a great stone altar against the sky, and search between  the winged roofs of the temple for the point of gold, where tall Athene of the Vanguard lifts her spear to the ships at sea.”

Breathtaking! Brings a lump to my throat! One can almost feel the heat of the sun on one’s brow and hear the birds singing in the trees overhead. The grasshoppers chirping. The scent of the summer heat in the air.

I love the intimate, personal reference to the type of plant growing at the funeral stele of uncle Alexias and Philon – a white oleander. Oleanders grow throughout my home town of Sydney, in private gardens and public parks; their bright bursts of pink and white and red everywhere. So this hit a personal note for me. And it prompted me to make a mental note to plant a white oleander, when I retire to that country property I keep promising myself I’ll retire to – Cherry Cake Cottage! 

Oops, I appear to have reverted to chapter 1! Apologies!   ::)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 09, 2007, 07:55:58 pm
she is putting forth a picture of a happy content city...in its prime and full of promise...and although she mentions the Spartans and the yearly forays they made across the border; she makes it sound like a minor inconvenience, rather than true war...they raided the farms (including Alexias's fathers) but it seems to have no affect on their standard of living...and they obeyed a certain etiquette...drawing a line at going too far "everything was burned that year, all but the house walls and the sacred orchard, which they piously spared."

These raids seemed almost a rote act; just a part of life "Being too young to understand serious things, I used to look forward, when they were gone, to seeing what they had been up to"

Interesting in today's world to see the way MR presents the conflict between the Athenians and Spartans...they kept to a reg schedule...the Athenians knew when they were coming...it was almost a cordial affair...

Just background noise....

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 09, 2007, 09:16:05 pm
Indeed, a magnificent city in its prime. Would be lovely to be able to go back in time and visit. But not during the plague or when the Spartans were invading! Come to think of it, maybe I’ll pass on the time-travel thing, after all!!!

Which leads me to your observation that the war between Athens and Sparta was “almost a cordial affair.” Wish I could agree with you on this point. I’d much prefer to imagine all those gorgeous young men “getting it on,” instead of killing each other. Alas, kill each other they did. And most brutally. Up close, eye to eye. Your beautiful adversary’s face contorted in agony, as you plunge your sword through his heart. His warm, life-blood literally covering you. Nothing as clinical as a bullet, shot from a distance, in those days!

And I venture that the only reason the walls of the farm were left standing was because of just that – they were stone walls, which the Spartans couldn’t burn. As for the olive trees, the Spartans wouldn’t dare burn them. They’d been planted by Athene (there was probably a shrine to her within the sacred grove, advising of this fact) and she could be a mean son-of-a-bitch when angered! It wasn’t for nothing that she held that spear and wore that helmet!

Certainly, the invasions were largely predictable at a certain time each year. And I am guessing that their main focus in burning the farms, was to destroy the crops. Alexias says, “. . . all of us coughing with the smoke of the burning fields.”  There was a reason why the Spartans were burning the fields, of course. It meant that if there was no food for the city, they may be able to starve-out the inhabitants and conquer the city proper. This was their ultimate aim. They wanted Athens, and all the fabulous wealth therein. In chapter 1 it is suspected that Spartans poisoning the water supply may have caused the plague. For this to be suspected, it’s probably happened in the past.

We all know that the Spartans were an army of warrior-lovers (or should that be “lover-warriors”?) and I got a certain quizzical voyeuristic buzz from reading Alexias’ account of what he found at the family farm, after the Spartans had gone home. He says he used to look forward to finding what they left behind each year.  I almost felt a sexual rush when Alexias recounted reading what the Spartans had written on the walls. Kinda like the feeling one gets on reading a particularly hot piece of graffiti in a public place. Admit it – we’ve all had that feeling! (gulp – I hope it’s not just me!). It was very personal – “. . . various tributes to their beauty and virtue.” Even reading Alexias’ second-hand account I still felt as though I was intruding upon something very personal. And the thought of finding the comb of one of those stunning Spartan warriors was a real turn-on for me. Like Alexias, I too would have considered such an item a “treasure.” I’m sure if daddy dearest hadn’t thrown it away, Alexias would have kept it under his pillow! Me too!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 12:41:24 am
oh I agree that the war was very real and very dirty...I was talking about how Alexias as a child saw it. It was unlikely he saw any of the nastiness that war truly was..but instead saw it from almost a romantic view....his father all dressed in his fine armor on his war horse riding off to face the enemy..and returning always 'victorious'...

to Alexias as a child it was all a great game, I doubt his father ever disabused him of his hero worship...

that is also one of my favorite scenes....when his father found the graffiti and he started 'rubbing angrily at the charcoal and saying "Get this ignorant scrawl whited over. The boy will never learn to spell, or to make his letters properly, with this in front of him"
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 10, 2007, 03:37:00 am
I must stop rabbiting-on about history and concentrate on what's in the book. I admire your focus and insight. I'm enjoying having  a female perspective. I have only ever read MR solitarily through the eyes of a man; albeit a sensitive, romantically inclined, gay man; but a man, nonetheless. I'd not appreciated this until now. In the past, I suspect I was concentrating on the grunt, the biffo and the sex!  ::)

I was aware of the romance, but I guess I was preoccupied with the harshness of the times. The blood and guts! Even in the highly charged romantic scene with Alexander in the great bed with Bagoas in "The Persian Boy," I'm most drawn to the way MR describes the smell of "sex and cedarwood" in the room! Grunt!  :o

I love the way you are looking through the wide eyes of the infant Alexias, watching his "beautiful" (sigh!) father march off to war, resplendent in his polished and beplumed armour. I've still got a crush on this cocky, arrogant, peacock of a man. However, as I'm not reading ahead and only taking one chapter at a time, I suspect I may come to regret any misplaced admiration I have for him. Am I right? Go on, you can tell me  ;)

Nooooo dooooon't! I'm enjoying it too much, to have the plot given away ahead of time! (comment aside to self - "I bet daddy dearest ends up being a real bastard, just like John Twist!")

Let's discuss the Rhodian?

Your turn!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 10, 2007, 03:46:27 am
Hmmm.... I guess I will go back and read this thread from the very beginning. I saw a post from Jess and Kerry and I started checking out this thread on the 7th page. It's as if I'm listening to half of a telephone conversation.

Serves me right for evesdropping, huh??  ???

I have some reading ahead of me tomorrow, I guess.  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 10, 2007, 03:57:54 am
David!!! What are you doing up at this time of night?! It's only 7pm here in Sydney, but I figure it must be very late in Indianapolis!   :o

Grab yourself a copy of "The Last of the Wine" and join our Mary Renault Book Club.   :laugh:

Do that tomorrow! Go to bed first!  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 10, 2007, 04:03:19 am
David!!! What are you doing up at this time of night?! It's only 7pm here in Sydney, but I figure it must be very late in Indianapolis!   :o

Grab yourself a copy of "The Last of the Wine" and join our Mary Renault Book Club.   :laugh:

Do that tomorrow! Go to bed first!  ;)

haha!

I'm a nightowl Kerry!

I'm going to bed right now.

Yeah, it's 3:00 am in Indianapolis, so I'm going to bed!  :)

Have a really super terrific day Kerry and I'll talk with ya tomorrow, my friend!

David.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 10, 2007, 07:59:49 am
One thing about all her books is that they "feel" real, like she's personally experienced these things, her Bagoas character was tremendous and she really can get you hot for the guys described!  The only thing that irks me is that most of the characters portray this concept of "greek love" where the sexual attractions are broadened to include both male and female. She doesn't really write about any truly gay male / female only characters - or is my memory slipping  ::)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 08:20:00 am
most of her characters DO have relationships with women, but the primary love affairs are between males. Remember that this was more the norm in ancient times, women were for children, men were for companionship and love. Women were considered to be so inferior as to not be able to meet a man's mind...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 08:21:54 am
Hmmm.... I guess I will go back and read this thread from the very beginning. I saw a post from Jess and Kerry and I started checking out this thread on the 7th page. It's as if I'm listening to half of a telephone conversation.

Serves me right for evesdropping, huh??  ???

I have some reading ahead of me tomorrow, I guess.  :)

LOOK at all these eaves lying around....David musta dropped 'em!

LOL!

Welcome to our little club, David...now get to reading!

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 08:27:52 am
I must stop rabbiting-on about history and concentrate on what's in the book. I admire your focus and insight. I'm enjoying having  a female perspective. I have only ever read MR solitarily through the eyes of a man; albeit a sensitive, romantically inclined, gay man; but a man, nonetheless. I'd not appreciated this until now. In the past, I suspect I was concentrating on the grunt, the biffo and the sex!  ::)

I was aware of the romance, but I guess I was preoccupied with the harshness of the times. The blood and guts! Even in the highly charged romantic scene with Alexander in the great bed with Bagoas in "The Persian Boy," I'm most drawn to the way MR describes the smell of "sex and cedarwood" in the room! Grunt!  :o


You calm down!! Take a deep breath!!
 :laugh: :laugh:

Quote
I love the way you are looking through the wide eyes of the infant Alexias, watching his "beautiful" (sigh!) father march off to war, resplendent in his polished and beplumed armour. I've still got a crush on this cocky, arrogant, peacock of a man. However, as I'm not reading ahead and only taking one chapter at a time, I suspect I may come to regret any misplaced admiration I have for him. Am I right? Go on, you can tell me  ;)

Nooooo dooooon't! I'm enjoying it too much, to have the plot given away ahead of time! (comment aside to self - "I bet daddy dearest ends up being a real bastard, just like John Twist!")

Let's discuss the Rhodian?

Your turn!!!  ;D

Alexias daddy is something else isn't he? You are not reading ahead? What self discipline!  ;)

oh the Rhodian....

witch! I tell you it definitely makes me question daddy's judgement. She terrorized not only Alexias but the whole household. She doesn't even sound like she was pretty but you know Alexias is not going to admit it even if she was.

a cruel desperate woman.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 08:47:14 am
cont.

you know that at this time in history for her to be hiring herself out as a nurse meant that she was low income and probably had little family. She must have thought she had fell in the honeypot...living in this fine house (sleeping with this hubba hubba man) and when it started falling apart, she held on with all her claws...taking her frustration out on Alexias...

how she must have dreamed that her circumstances had changed. My bet is that she was so desperate to hang on she pushed Alexias's father away....you men don't seem to care too much for 'desperate'... :laugh: ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 10, 2007, 09:12:38 am
LOOK at all these eaves lying around....David musta dropped 'em!

LOL!

Welcome to our little club, David...now get to reading!

Hee-hee!  I've just been reading David's blog and laughed out loud at the repartee between you two   :laugh:

It's nearly midnight so I'm off to bed. I've got some comments to make about the Rhodian tomorrow!  >:(

Nighty-night!   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 09:19:48 am
now why do I have the impression your comments are NOT going to be positive??

 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 10, 2007, 06:43:14 pm
One thing about all her books is that they "feel" real, like she's personally experienced these things, her Bagoas character was tremendous and she really can get you hot for the guys described!  The only thing that irks me is that most of the characters portray this concept of "greek love" where the sexual attractions are broadened to include both male and female. She doesn't really write about any truly gay male / female only characters - or is my memory slipping  ::)

Hey Zander!

Welcome! Good to see you here. Grab a copy of "The Last of the Wine" and join our Mary Renault Book Club. We're only up to chapter 2, so you haven't missed a lot.

(Aside to Jess - Gad, we're only up to chapter 2 and have already filled eight pages!!!)  :o

Kerry   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 06:56:13 pm
Hey Zander!

Welcome! Good to see you here. Grab a copy of "The Last of the Wine" and join our Mary Renault Book Club. We're only up to chapter 2, so you haven't missed a lot.

(Aside to Jess - Gad, we're only up to chapter 2 and have already filled eight pages!!!)  :o
Kerry   :)

I KNOW!! I was thinking "Lort we are gonna be six months on this one book! But I am sure having fun with it!

(You tell me if/when you want to speed up...like I said I am having fun!)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 10, 2007, 08:50:51 pm
I feel like I am in a University Literature classroom. I greatly appreciate the history and friendly and interesting discussion and comments by everyone. I bought my copy of TLOTW.  I may not have anything to contribute to the discussions but eagerly look forward to each post.

Doug
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 10, 2007, 09:37:27 pm
I feel like I am in a University Literature classroom. I greatly appreciate the history and friendly and interesting discussion and comments by everyone. I bought my copy of TLOTW.  I may not have anything to contribute to the discussions but eagerly look forward to each post.

Doug


YAY!

Another reader (who is MORE than welcome to jump any time!!)

welcome Doug!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 11, 2007, 06:05:59 am
Hey Zander!

Welcome! Good to see you here. Grab a copy of "The Last of the Wine" and join our Mary Renault Book Club. We're only up to chapter 2, so you haven't missed a lot.

(Aside to Jess - Gad, we're only up to chapter 2 and have already filled eight pages!!!)  :o

Kerry   :)
I've already read it - I think I've read all the Mary Renault books she was one of my favorites.  I'm following where you've got up to and interst should be given to the relationship between Alexis and his father (and also his father's past history  ;) )  My comment was a generalisation that although there are relationships between the sexes, we don't get the unimpeachable evidence of a character we would recognise as "homosexual" / Gay in our modern context.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 06:59:47 am
I feel like I am in a University Literature classroom. I greatly appreciate the history and friendly and interesting discussion and comments by everyone. I bought my copy of TLOTW.  I may not have anything to contribute to the discussions but eagerly look forward to each post.

Doug

Hey Doug!

Great to have you with us. You are very welcome to comment at any time. Glad to hear you have a copy of TLOTW and are following along with us.

Welcome!

Kerry    ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 07:06:09 am
I KNOW!! I was thinking "Lort we are gonna be six months on this one book! But I am sure having fun with it!

(You tell me if/when you want to speed up...like I said I am having fun!)

Cain't say that there's any way we can speed up. All this stuff must be discussed before we can progress! And besides, I'm enjoying this sooo much!  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 07:20:57 am
My comments re the Rhodian (sorry they're late - busy day at the coalface today):

“Witch” is an appropriate word. And I doubt that her name is Glinda! I suspect the coven she belongs to is strictly of the “black” variety! Speaking of names, what is the Rhodian’s name? And what is Alexias’ father’s name, for that matter?

Appears to me that if Alexias doesn’t like someone, he doesn’t tell us their names. As though he doesn't want to remember them, and wants us to forget them, too.

Whereas, if he likes someone, he doesn’t hesitate in giving us the name. For example, even the dinner guest, seen but fleetingly, who pissed in the courtyard, was given a name - Alkibiades. Granted, he did have the beauty of an incarnate god and was, therefore, memorable! Even making “water,” he was memorable!

Have I missed something here - with the names?

But back to the witch! She sounds to be despicable at every level and when viewed from any angle.

There’s not a lot more I can add to what you have already said, Jess. However, I have highlighted some parts of the text in my working photocopy and feel I may benefit by skimming through my notes here. Just to get the impression clear in my mind.

When Alexias first mentions her, he says, “my father engaged a nurse, a free woman from Rhodes.” From these few words, we gain a great deal of information. We can instantly place her within the social strata and constraints of the times. We know she’s not a slave. But she has no wealth or fortune of her own. Otherwise she wouldn’t be working as a nanny. Wouldn’t be working at all, in fact. And we know she’s from Rhodes. Ergo, not Greek. Ergo, inferior?

He further describes her as, “slim and swarthy, with a strain of Egypt in her.” Much as I want to hate her, I must say that the first image that came to mind when I read this was the beautiful portrait bust of Egyptian Queen Nefertiti. And though she is most surely psychologically flawed (if not demented), it hurts me to have to concede that she is probably physically attractive. I mean, why would a man as socially desirable and physically “beautiful” as Alexias’ father tolerate a frump in his bed? Your thoughts on this?

Alexias says, “when her hand lay heavy on me,” so we know that she beat him. And I agree with you, that it was probably part of her brief, to discipline him. I have no doubt that the father expected her to discipline Alexias, and would have left it to her, to decide what particular form that discipline took.

Alexias advises that she had no “graces,” which verifies for me that she was low-born. Didn’t know how to conduct herself within polite society. Didn't know how to make small talk, conduct herself appropriately at table, use the cutlery, what glass to use, etc. I’m sure we’ve all known people like this. They look stunning – until they open their mouths! Any catwalk model could be used as an example (meow!).

For Alexias to observe that, “she seemed as lasting a part of my house as the porch or the well,” I understand that she was bossy, overbearing and omnipresent. A formidably malevolent force for a child to contend with, indeed!

I have no doubt that she was cunning and manipulative. She knew that her days were numbered, which is why she discouraged Alexias’ progress. I believe, in an effort to keep him young (immature), meaning the services of a nanny would continue to be required.

And the fact that she wrung the neck of Alexias’ little kitten is an absolutely unconscionably despicable act. Pity that cat didn’t have one of the submachine guns David’s sniper kitties carry! That would have surely taught her a lesson! This proves to me that she is certainly sadistic, and probably also mentally unbalanced. She would certainly try any underhand trick to stay in that cushy job. Not to mention that comfy, warm bed!

And in the cruelty stakes, you can’t get much lower than telling a little boy that he was a runt who came close to being exposed at birth, for wolves to devour, for no other reason than that he was just too plain butt-ugly to live! Yep, she’s one hell of an evil cow alright!

Let's discuss Socrates briefly (I promise!!!) before progressing to chapter 3. Comments?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 11, 2007, 08:05:10 am
no we do not have Alexias's fathers name at this time (although it will be casually mentioned later)

Just my thoughts on the name thing...MR is putting us firmly in the mind of this child, although we do get flashs of the adult Alexias in the text, and children are very self centered. We get the important names (to a child) the name of his  namesake and I think we get the name of Alcibiades for later...but a young child doesn't think of his parent as anything but daddy. (Just my 2 cents)

now the Rhodian! we are not going to hear anything good of her (and can you blame him!) even the description...slim and 'swarthy'?? no woman would want to be described as SWARTHY!! that invokes a big ol hairy neanderthal!! yes, it means dark and all but yuck! LOL! and to imply that she is some half breed...(strain of Egyptian) ALexias is subtly insulting her.

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 11, 2007, 08:17:32 am
now Socrates...

before I get into HIM...I wanted to comment on Alexias. Being under the control of the Rhodian, with her abuse both physical (which I don't think was too awful - his father surely would have noticed overt bruising or welts) and mental (which I think was her main weapon - leaving no marks and being VERY effective at making him act withdrawn and sullen) she has affected his social developement and his self esteem....he says he has no friends and is considered the 'low man' at school...HE is the one forced to sit with the 'old man'

"I could see at once that I, who was always alone, was the one who would be made a fool of by having to share his bench"

but we see his resilience and a flash of his defiance as he continues

"so I pretended not to mind, and sat there of my own accord"

in spite of her best efforts, the Rhodian had not destroyed his spirit!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 08:21:22 am
Just my thoughts on the name thing...MR is putting us firmly in the mind of this child, although we do get flashs of the adult Alexias in the text, and children are very self centered. We get the important names (to a child) the name of his  namesake and I think we get the name of Alcibiades for later...but a young child doesn't think of his parent as anything but daddy. (Just my 2 cents)

Once again, Jess, your insight staggers me! I keep forgetting to look through the eyes of a child. And you are absolutley correct about the names. At his age I had a Mummy and Daddy in my life, not an Emily and Raymond! You are also bringing the insight that only a mother can bring - "children are very self centred," you said. Very true.

  
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 11, 2007, 09:50:02 am
One thing about all her books is that they "feel" real, like she's personally experienced these things, her Bagoas character  was tremendous and she really can get you hot for the guys described!  The only thing that irks me is that most of the characters portray this concept of "greek love" where the sexual attractions are broadened to include both male and female. She doesn't really write about any truly gay male / female only characters - or is my memory slipping  ::)

Bagoas is WAY my favorite of all her characters. He is just an amazing personality....he went thru so much in his young life yet never lost himself...

She truly created a 'real' person from just a couple of snippets of historical references.

and I think he is the only one of her characters that are depicted as strictly gay....(by circumstance maybe but still) and she was much more graphic with the sexual aspects of Bagoas's life...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 07:56:47 pm
now the Rhodian! we are not going to hear anything good of her (and can you blame him!) even the description...slim and 'swarthy'?? no woman would want to be described as SWARTHY!! that invokes a big ol hairy neanderthal!! yes, it means dark and all but yuck! LOL! and to imply that she is some half breed...(strain of Egyptian) ALexias is subtly insulting her.

'Fraid I'm compelled to disagree with you on this point, Jess. I'm crazy about ancient Egyptian civilization. They were sooo advanced. And the people were largely so elegant and attractive (if we can go by the statues and tomb paintings). Modern, somehow. For example, their stylized abstract painting style. And the almost contemporary design of their clothing, jewellery and pottery. I consider the portrait bust of Nefertiti to be one of the greatest works of art to survive the ancient world. It is truly stunning. Re the mixed heritage thing, drawing on my own observation, I have noticed that often such people combine the beautiful aspects of their diverse background. For example, olive skin and black lashes, combined with azure blue eyes. Gorgeous! (PS, my Oxford English Dictionary defines "swarthy" as "dark complexioned." Not a bad thing, surely?)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 11, 2007, 08:10:18 pm
no not at all....but we use certain words for men and not for women....(typically) so for a MAN to be swarthy evokes dark and sensual, exotic.....

for a woman? no....if I were going to describe a dark skinned woman I would use more feminine terms....'olive skinned and dark haired'..I just don't see using THAT word to describe a woman...

and I am not saying the part about her being an Egyptian having anything to do with her looks....but at this time in history when the idea of Greek purity and division between peoples that to be a half ANYTHING is not considered good...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 10:51:57 pm
I've already read it - I think I've read all the Mary Renault books she was one of my favorites.  I'm following where you've got up to and interst should be given to the relationship between Alexis and his father (and also his father's past history  ;) )  My comment was a generalisation that although there are relationships between the sexes, we don't get the unimpeachable evidence of a character we would recognise as "homosexual" / Gay in our modern context.

I’m going to be boring, boring, boring again, and ask that we get a little background behind us, prior to progressing further.

I recommend “The Oxford Companion to Classical Civilization,” published by Oxford University Press. It covers everything you ever wanted to know about the classical world in readily understandable (though, sometimes challenging) laymen’s language.

Under the main heading of “Homosexuality,” there are the following sub-headings:
* Deviance & Toleration
* “Greek Love”
* Lesbianism
* Origins & Causes
* Pederasty
* Periodization

Let’s begin with the main text re “Homosexuality” proper (or should that be improper?!):

No Greek or Latin word corresponds to the modern term “homosexuality,” and ancient Mediterranean societies did not in practice treat homosexuality as a socially operative category of personal or public life. Sexual relations between persons of the same sex certainly did occur (they are widely attested in ancient sources), but they were not systematically distinguished or conceptualised as such, much less were they thought to represent a single, homogeneous phenomenon in contradistinction to sexual relations between persons of different sexes. That is because the ancients did not classify kinds of sexual desire or behaviour according to the sameness or difference of the sexes of the persons who engaged in the sexual act; rather, they evaluated sexual acts according to the degree to which such acts either violated or conformed to norms of conduct deemed appropriate to individual sexual actors by reason of their gender, age, and social status. It is therefore impossible to speak in general terms about ancient attitudes to “homosexuality,” or about the degree of its acceptance or toleration by particular communities, because any such statement would, in effect, lump together various behaviours which the ancients themselves kept rigorously distinct and to which they attach radically divergent meanings and values. (Exactly the same things could be said, of course, and with equal justification, about “heterosexuality”)

It is not illegitimate to employ modern sexual terms and concepts when interrogating the ancient record, but particular caution must be exercised in order not to import modern, western sexual categories and ideologies into the interpretation of the ancient evidence. Hence, students of classical antiquity need to be clear about when they intend the term “homosexual” descriptively – i.e. to denote nothing more than same-sex sexual relations – and when they intend it substantively or normatively – i.e. to denominate a discrete kind of sexual psychology or behaviour, a positive species of sexual being, or a basic component of “human sexuality.” The application of “homosexuality” (and “heterosexuality”) in a substantive or normative sense to sexual expression in classical antiquity is not advised.

Greek and Roman men (whose sexual subjectivity receives vastly greater attention in the extant sources than does women’s) generally understood sex to be defined in terms of sexual penetration and phallic pleasure, whether the sexual partners were two males, two females, or one male and one female. The physical act of sex itself required, in their eyes, a polarization of the sexual partners into the categories of penetrator and penetrated as well as a corresponding polarization of sexual roles into “active” and “passive.” The roles in turn were correlated with superordinate and subordinate social status, with masculine and feminine gender styles, and (in the case of males, at least) with adulthood and adolescence. Phallic insertion functioned as a marker of male precedence; it also expressed social domination and seniority. The isomorphism of sexual, social, gender, and age roles made the distinction between “activity” and “passivity” paramount for categorizing sexual acts and actors of either gender; the distinction between homosexual and heterosexual contacts could still be invoked for certain purposes (e.g. Ov. Ars am. 2. 682-4; Achilles Tatius 2. 33-8), but it remained of comparatively minor taxonomic and ethical significance.

Any sexual relation that involved the penetration of a social inferior (whether inferior in age, gender, or status) qualified as sexually normal for a male, irrespective of the penetrated person’s anatomical sex, whereas to be sexually penetrated was always potentially shaming, especially for a free male of citizen status (e.g. Tac. Ann. II. 36). Roman custom accordingly placed the sons or Roman citizens off limits to men. In Classical Athens, by contrast, free boys could be openly courted, but a series of elaborate protocols served to shield them from the shame associated with bodily penetration, thereby enabling them to gratify their male suitors without compromising their future status as adult men.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 11, 2007, 10:58:58 pm
??? 

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 11, 2007, 10:59:46 pm
You all are scaring me a little because I have NO idea what you all are talking about.

I think I'm too stupid for this thread.  :-\

Maybe if I reread it another 100 times I'll understand it a little.  :P ...  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 11, 2007, 11:15:19 pm
You all are scaring me a little because I have NO idea what you all are talking about.

I think I'm too stupid for this thread.  :-\

Maybe if I reread it another 100 times I'll understand it a little.  :P ...  :)

I have read your blog, David,  and I know you are not "stupid."  "The Last of the Wine" is a novel written by British author Mary Renault. It is set in ancient Greece and has lots of gay themes and characters.

Grab a copy from your local bookstore or library and join our Book Club. We're only up to chapter 2, so there's plenty of time to catch up. Alternatively, you may prefer to just follow the thread. It's fun!

 
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 09:36:36 am
thanks , Professor Kerry , for your enthusiasm and intriguing additions and supportive information and insights for this wonderful and lively discussion. I look forward to each post " lecture" eventhough I am sitting in the back of the lecture room admiring you and your expertise. Will you be using an overhead projection for visuals of the people, places and things ? What a handsome professor we have for this wonderful course in classical civilization !!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 12, 2007, 09:43:41 am
You all are scaring me a little because I have NO idea what you all are talking about.

I think I'm too stupid for this thread.  :-\

Maybe if I reread it another 100 times I'll understand it a little.  :P ...  :)


*Agog that ANY discussion she is a part of could be called too smart*

Hey David!!

If I am here taking part it can't be all THAT intellectual....get a copy and jump in, fer heavens sake!!

we just having fun!!

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 12, 2007, 09:45:44 am
thanks , Professor Kerry , for your enthusiasm and intriguing additions and supportive information and insights for this wonderful and lively discussion. I look forward to each post " lecture" eventhough I am sitting in the back of the lecture room admiring you and your expertise. Will you be using an overhead projection for visuals of the people, places and things ? What a handsome professor we have for this wonderful course in classical civilization !!!

now there is an idea!! LOL!

we need some pics!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 09:50:08 am
Jess...one of my favorite pictures on the entire internet is the one you posted on as reply #167 The Allure of Man. Do you think our main character looked like your picture ?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 12, 2007, 10:03:04 am
You all are scaring me a little because I have NO idea what you all are talking about.

I think I'm too stupid for this thread.  :-\

Maybe if I reread it another 100 times I'll understand it a little.  :P ...  :)

Naaah don't be put off MR is a fantastic read and TLOTW is an excellent book.  Kerry is answering very fully my question about homosexuality and exactly what that means in terms of the culture and times in which MR set these stories.  My point is, just to provoke debate, is that MR never created a character that we in todays society, would term as wholly Gay (considersing she was gay herself) - there was always the "get out clause" of this is the culture of the times etc.  I think this was because she may have feared a backlash from modern society at the time of publishing.  Bagoas (The Persian Boy), who was mentioned earlier was a captured prince and was castrated as a youth just entering puberty.  He had very little choice about how to gain sexual pleasure he was "created" as a sex slave by the act of capture and castration so he has an "excuse".

My point of debate is - do we think MR was avoiding creating a "gay" character even though all her books use homosexuality as a key theme.  Might be a bit too soon to debate this, lets see what people think as the progress further through TLOTW  ;)

Enjoy it, I certainly did.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 12, 2007, 10:09:50 am
now there is an idea!! LOL!

we need some pics!!
Well you did ask!

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h95/naxman_photos/men/RafaelVerga03.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 12, 2007, 10:11:24 am
now there is an idea!! LOL!

we need some pics!!

Funny you should say that. Here's what I imagine Big Daddy may have looked like:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/HermesbyPraxiteles.jpg)

(the Praxiteles Hermes c.330-320 BC)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 12, 2007, 10:14:25 am
Or maybe Daddy Dearest looked like this:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/ApolloBelvedere.jpg)

(the Apollo Belvedere - Roman copy of Greek original)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 10:17:44 am
Professor Kerry, would you please comment on the significance of "The Old Man" ?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 12, 2007, 10:17:50 am
Here's how I imagine the Rhodian might have looked (minus the crown):

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Nefertiti.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 10:24:15 am
Interesting pictures...please keep them coming...they add to the discussion and stimulate my senses !!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 12, 2007, 10:32:48 am
Or maybe Daddy Dearest looked like this:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/ApolloBelvedere.jpg)

(the Apollo Belvedere - Roman copy of Greek original)


I think he models for a Herm so it would be more of a Hermes / Eros look (Eros isn't that intersting  ;) ) The Herm was often just depicted as a phallus, so again something to consider about the skills of MR.

(http://www.theoi.com/image/S11.3Hermes.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 12, 2007, 10:33:37 am
Professor Kerry, would you please comment on the significance of "The Old Man" ?

Well now, Doug, you know I just can't wait to get stuck into dear Socrates. However, I know if I start now, I won't be able to stop! And as it's just gone 1.30 in the morning here in Sydney Towne, I'd better get to bed before the sun starts peeking over the horizon. I've just had a Baileys nightcap and my bed is calling to me. So I'm off to the Land of Nod. Saturday tomorrow and I will post a few comments about Socrates.

Nighty-night   :)

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 10:39:31 am
Sweet dreams...the "Old Man" I was asking you to comment on is " The Old Man" who becomes Alexias' friend at school.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 12, 2007, 07:09:57 pm

I think he models for a Herm so it would be more of a Hermes / Eros look (Eros isn't that intersting  ;) ) The Herm was often just depicted as a phallus, so again something to consider about the skills of MR.

(http://www.theoi.com/image/S11.3Hermes.jpg)

I think we need to wait a bit on some of these pics...but lets keep them bookmarked....particularly the one on the Allure thread...(sorry, don't think he is dark enough for Alexias...remember he took after his mother!)

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 12, 2007, 07:23:15 pm
Sweet dreams...the "Old Man" I was asking you to comment on is " The Old Man" who becomes Alexias' friend at school.

but that IS Socrates!! The next to last line in the chapter tells us...

"Whoever came to Sokrates, no matter by what absurd chance, felt afterwards that he had been directed by a god."

I love how MR drops these names on us....as if these figures from the mists of myth and time are just regular guys living down the road!  :laugh:

Do ya'll believe in this 'second sight' Socrates claims? I do....my father could foretell deaths...on more than three occassions he woke us in the night to tell us a relative was dead. (at the time we had no phone how he knew they were dead and the circumstances of their demise is a mystery)

MR put a lot of wisdom in the words she gave Socrates...how much of it was actual quotes from the real Socrates and how much she made up I don't know. (It is my understanding that Socrates left no written records of his teachings and the only things we know of him are from the writings of contempories including Plato)

From this chapter...

when asked if he was not embarrassed to be taking music lessons with young boys.

his answer:

"It was much more disgraceful for an old man not to learn what could make him better, than for boys, since he had had time to know the worth of it;"

he continues

"a god came to me lately in a dream, and told me to make music. But whether with the hands or in the soul, he did not say; so you can see I ought not neglect either."

How many of us would have the courage and determination to back up our beliefs so completely?

sometimes it is not so much what everyone thinks that is important...sometimes for our own souls we have to do as WE think is important...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 07:42:47 pm
Jess...Thanks for setting me straight about the Old Man being Socrates. This is really all very new to me. I am not really familiar with the writings of the author , her style, or the Greek Civilization Period or stories she so wonderfully writes. Oh by the way would you e-mail a copy of the FULL picture of your reply # 167 on The Allure of Man thread ? Thanks  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 12, 2007, 07:53:55 pm
LOL!!!

sorry that is all I have!!

you want the website address??  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 12, 2007, 09:24:35 pm
thanks for your reply, Jess. I will be happy looking at the picture as you posted it.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 12, 2007, 11:49:52 pm
there is a line in this chapter when Alexias encounters Socrates for the first time....he forms a friendship with this 'old' man...a little lonely boy and just devastated when he left..

he couchs his thoughts with a side step...

"It may be that I thought 'Here is a father who would not think me a disgrace to him (for he is ugly himself) but would love me, and would not want to throw me away on the mountain' I do not know"

My heart breaks for this little boy who feels SO unloved and ugly....how much he carried on his young shoulders!! not only did he have this legacy from his namesake but his handsome father! what HUGE shoes he had to feel no wonder he was over whelmed and withdrawn...

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 12:21:31 am
Do ya'll believe in this 'second sight' Socrates claims? I do....my father could foretell deaths...on more than three occassions he woke us in the night to tell us a relative was dead. (at the time we had no phone how he knew they were dead and the circumstances of their demise is a mystery)

I do believe in second sight and have experienced it personally. Gerard and I had just moved in together way back in the early '70s. Early one morning, just before dawn, I woke with the strangest sensation that there was a third person in our bedroom! And the room was very cold! I went back to sleep, and the first thing I said to Gerard when we woke up was, "Mrs Smuthers died last night" (she had cancer). I'm not sure why I said it. The words sorta came out of my mouth of their own accord. But I believed what I was saying. Gerard asked me how I knew. I responded that she had visited us to say good bye. Shortly afterwards, as we were having breakfast, I saw that Mrs Smuthers' son, Fred (a very close school friend of mine since age 12 - I'd been close to the family for many years), was headed for our front door. Even before I opened the door and saw his tears, I knew why he was there. I have no doubt that Mrs Smuthers had visited me that night, to ask me to look out for Fred.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 12:26:46 am
Here's a pic of Mary Renault:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/MaryRenault1905-1983.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 12:28:55 am
I promise not to rabbit-on excessively about Socrates (Sokrates in the book). Though I’ve not peeked ahead, I feel we’ll be hearing a lot more from him in future chapters. For that reason, I’ll keep my observations brief and succinct for now. Or, at least, as succinct as I possible can! So just a few quick dot-points before progressing, at last, to chapter 3:

The music teacher is referred to by the pupils as “the Old Man’s Teacher,” in reference to Sokrates, who was “about forty-five.” Must have appeared positively ancient to the young Alexias, whose father would have only been in his twenties.

My heart broke for dear little Alexias when I read that he was “always alone.” I empathised with him and shared a similar childhood (alas, there was no Sokrates in my life!)

I concur with Jess and was absolutely elated when I read that Alexias “pretended not to mind.” Indeed, Jess, the hateful Rhodian had not succeeded in breaking Alexias’ spirit. Hooray!

With reference to Sokrates resembling Silenos, I quote (part) from the Oxford Classical Dictionary (Oxford University Press) under “Satyrs & Sileni” - “The comparison of Socrates with Silenus is based not only on common ugliness but also on common irony and wisdom. Portraits of Socrates and idealised heads of Sileni show great similarity. Silenus is often represented as a good father and the Satyrs as his children.” Once again, MRs research skills are impeccable.

The most strikingly beautiful insight into the personality of Sokrates, for me, came when Alexias recounts, “He turned to answer me; and I felt a kind of shock, as if a bright light had been shone upon my heart; for he did not look as most people do at children, half thinking of something else.” This coming from an abused, isolated child, brought a definite lump to my throat. In Sokrates, Alexias has found an adult who listens to him and is interested in him. Sokrates pays full attention when Alexias is speaking.

Alexias advises that he did not hesitate to “show off” his (little) knowledge with Sokrates, meaning he did not fear ridicule or humiliation from him. He also says he felt “at home” with him. Friendship is built on such foundations.

I was emotionally moved by Sokrates’ response, when Alexias asked why “an old man like him wanted to come to school.” Sokrates replies, “A god came to me lately in a dream and told me to make music. But whether with the hands or in the soul, he did not say; so you can see I ought not to neglect either.” What a delightful insight into the mind-set of the ancient world.

Alexias refers to Sokrates directly as “my friend.” And we know the friendship is reciprocated - “Next day, instead of creeping to school, I ran, so as to be early and talk with him. He was only just in time for the lesson; but he must have noticed me looking out for him, and next day came a little earlier.”

I guess one could paraphrase all this by simply saying that Sokrates was a brilliant teacher and communicator. He brought out the best in young people. Certainly, Alexias advises that the other students, who had initially derided him, soon “began craning to listen.” And another indication of the same - “With him it came naturally to ask a question.” Meaning, he filled one with confidence, so as not to be afraid of being ridiculed. It is also implied here that one could usually be assured an appropriate response. If he didn’t know the answer, Alexias tells us, he would say directly that “he did not know.” So, he’s honest in his responses - not a bull-shitter.

And on top of all this, Sokrates is psychic, too! Alexias says, “Whoever came to Sokrates, no matter by what absurd chance, felt afterwards that he had been directed by a god.” I loved the “force of his nature” quote in this context.

And silly old emotional me was again moved when I read, “I missed him greatly when he left. It may be that I had thought, ‘Here is a father who would not think me a disgrace to him (for he is ugly himself) but would love me, and would not want to throw me away on the mountain’.” Staggeringly beautiful.

Shall we progress to chapter 3?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 01:13:58 am
no!

not til I bring us back to the issue of names....we hear of 'the Rhodian', Alcibiades, Sokrates, and his father...but the last line in this chapter is

"Not long after this my father married his second wife, Arete, the daughter of Archagoras."

now....here he is giving this woman a very high honor indeed...traditionally that is how he would introduce a man! not only do we get HER name but her father's name. This is no trivial liason...no this is a true Athenian Lady! The ONLY time in the book this far that anyone gets such an honor!

Knowing how he felt toward 'the Rhodian' what does this tell you about Arete??

Kerry?

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 01:14:47 am
NOW I am ready for Chapter 3!!

 :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 01:27:39 am
I am a little jealous of you Kerry...I have everything memorized!!  :laugh:

how fun to be rediscovering this wonderful book!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 01:47:46 am
I am a little jealous of you Kerry...I have everything memorized!!  :laugh:

how fun to be rediscovering this wonderful book!

Damn Jess! You memorized the whole book? How many times did you read it?

Maybe I should go to the bookstore and buy it.  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 01:50:24 am
and we haven't even gotten to the sex scenes....whew!!!

the woman can write!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 01:51:26 am
Damn Jess! You memorized the whole book? How many times did you read it?

Maybe I should go to the bookstore and buy it.  :)

GO!! get it!!

good grief! (you would LOVE it!!)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 01:55:42 am
and we haven't even gotten to the sex scenes....whew!!!

the woman can write!!

Wha what?

What sex scenes?  It has sex scenes in it?

What's the name of this book again?  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 02:02:33 am
an overview of what we will see in Chapter 3...

this is a long chapter...with a LOT going on...Alexias is now 15 (and attracting men's attention already...this 'ugly' child)....the Athenians are preparing to go to war against Syracuse....the city is in an uproar over a night of vandalism...we meet Xenophon (the famed horseman)...Socrates makes another appearance....




and





and





LYSIS!!

*swoon*
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 02:07:47 am
Is this the kind of book a gay man from Indiana could relate to?

I like a lot of pictures in my books.  ;)

Seriously, I might end up buying this book.

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 02:13:09 am
I'm sorry David...it is not a picture book...you have to use your imagination...but it is pretty easy..she gives GREAT descriptions..

I think there is a lot in here that you can relate to!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 02:14:40 am
and it is not a big book....it reads very easily, goes down very smoothly!!

you will love it and have all the others in no time!

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 02:16:02 am
and it is not a big book....it reads very easily, goes down very smoothly!!

you will love it and have all the others in no time!



What do you mean by "all the others"?

How many books did this woman write?

Is she paying you a commission or somthing?  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 02:17:58 am
....and if it reads so easily, how come it took ya'll 2 weeks just to get to chapter 3?

I'm kidding Jess. I probably will end up buying it.  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 02:19:37 am
those two chapters were only eleven pages total!!

we are just very passionate about it!! LOL!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 02:22:10 am
Hell, you all are being more than passionate.... you're making love to the damn thing.

Again, I jest.  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 02:28:08 am
Hell, you all are being more than passionate.... you're making love to the damn thing.

Again, I jest.  ;)

well the next chapter is 28 pages long!! so everyone kick off your shoes and loosen your belts...we gonna be here a while...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 02:32:23 am
well the next chapter is 28 pages long!! so everyone kick off your shoes and loosen your belts...we gonna be here a while...

People will be putting their Christmas trees back up by the time you all finish discussing that chapter.

Hunker down.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 02:36:04 am
I need to get my ass to bed Jess. I'll talk to ya tomorrow!  :)

Sweet dreams.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 02:46:05 am
night night!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 03:39:02 am
MR put a lot of wisdom in the words she gave Socrates...how much of it was actual quotes from the real Socrates and how much she made up I don't know. (It is my understanding that Socrates left no written records of his teachings and the only things we know of him are from the writings of contempories including Plato)

:laugh:  I am literally bent over, wailing with laughter here  :laugh: What do you two do for a living? You're a couple of comedy writers, aren't you? You are both lightning fast!  Boom-boom!  :o I am left floundering in your superior wake!  :(

Here's a couple of interesting quotes under "Socrates" from the "Oxford Classical Dictionary" (Oxford University Press). It's a loooong entry. These stood out for me personally:

"No one is wiser than Socrates" - the Delphic Oracle (i.e., the God Apollo, speaking through the Pythian priestess)

"He was remarkable for his unflinching courage, both moral and physical, and his strong sense of duty. Together with this went an extremely genial and kind temperament and a keen sense of humour, while he was obviously a man of the greatest intellectual ability."

"He had no set of positive doctrines to teach. None the less his influence on subsequent thought was undoubtedly very great."

"He may be regarded as the inspiration  for the development , not only of moral philosophy, but also of logic."

Gasp! Impressive, indeed!



Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 03:42:19 am
sometimes it is not so much what everyone thinks that is important...sometimes for our own souls we have to do as WE think is important...

Beautifully expressed, Jess.  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 03:44:46 am
there is a line in this chapter when Alexias encounters Socrates for the first time....he forms a friendship with this 'old' man...a little lonely boy and just devastated when he left..

he couchs his thoughts with a side step...

"It may be that I thought 'Here is a father who would not think me a disgrace to him (for he is ugly himself) but would love me, and would not want to throw me away on the mountain' I do not know"

My heart breaks for this little boy who feels SO unloved and ugly....how much he carried on his young shoulders!! not only did he have this legacy from his namesake but his handsome father! what HUGE shoes he had to feel no wonder he was over whelmed and withdrawn...

My heart also breaks for him. Mary Renault got us good!   :'(
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 03:56:09 am
no!

not til I bring us back to the issue of names....we hear of 'the Rhodian', Alcibiades, Sokrates, and his father...but the last line in this chapter is

"Not long after this my father married his second wife, Arete, the daughter of Archagoras."

now....here he is giving this woman a very high honor indeed...traditionally that is how he would introduce a man! not only do we get HER name but her father's name. This is no trivial liason...no this is a true Athenian Lady! The ONLY time in the book this far that anyone gets such an honor!

Knowing how he felt toward 'the Rhodian' what does this tell you about Arete??

Kerry?

Gasp! I'm left with my mouth open here (shut up, David!!! ;) LOL  :-*) Seriously, I was so overcome with emotion by the departure of Socrates that I am compelled to confess that I didn't even notice the last paragraph! Just trying to tread water quickly here and regain my composure, I would guess that it tells us that Arete is a woman of substance from the same social strata as Alexias' father. An equal, or at least as much an equal as a woman could be within Athenian society LOL. I suspect it also indicates that Alexias likes her. Am I close?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 03:59:58 am
an overview of what we will see in Chapter 3...

this is a long chapter...with a LOT going on...Alexias is now 15 (and attracting men's attention already...this 'ugly' child)....the Athenians are preparing to go to war against Syracuse....the city is in an uproar over a night of vandalism...we meet Xenophon (the famed horseman)...Socrates makes another appearance....




and





and





LYSIS!!

*swoon*

Exciting! Can't wait! Let's begin!   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 04:04:06 am
People will be putting their Christmas trees back up by the time you all finish discussing that chapter.

Hunker down.

I fear you may be right, David!  But I'm going to enjoy the process ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 09:33:29 pm
I think he models for a Herm so it would be more of a Hermes / Eros look (Eros isn't that intersting  ;) ) The Herm was often just depicted as a phallus, so again something to consider about the skills of MR.

A Hermae (or Herm) was a plinth with a head on top and large, rampant phallus emerging from the plinth itself. There were also two beam-shaped projections near the shoulders to hold wreaths. They originally represented only the God Hermes but later served for portrait busts or other deities. Hermae stood  in large numbers in the streets and squares of Athens and other cities.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 09:53:12 pm
and they figure very heavily in the next chapter...it is mentioned that the Spartans also had them but theirs were merely a mound of stones...

Kerry can you give us a background on the significance of a Herm? What are they for...what did they mean to the ancient people??
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 09:57:28 pm
My point of debate is - do we think MR was avoiding creating a "gay" character even though all her books use homosexuality as a key theme.  Might be a bit too soon to debate this, lets see what people think as the progress further through TLOTW  ;)

To quote my previous post in which I quoted from the "Oxford Companion to Classical Civilisation" (Oxford University Press):

"The application of 'homosexuality' (and 'heterosexuality') in a substantive or normative sense to sexual expression in classical antiquity is not advised."


  

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 10:04:55 pm
To quote my previous post in which I quoted from the "Oxford Companion to Classical Civilisation" (Oxford University Press):

"The application of 'homosexuality' (and 'heterosexuality') in a substantive or normative sense to sexual expression in classical antiquity is not advised."


SURELY you are not saying that all those teenage boys laid very still and never once enjoyed ANY of the sex...I would find that very hard to believe in context of the very passionate poems and odes we have from that time...

I can accept that it was not spoken of in polite society but the idea of the younger never once showing sexual interest a little far fetched...

one source I read, and of course I don't remember where....said that ORAL sex was frowned upon..."a man who was known to engage in oral sex was not offered the common cup at a banquet....interesting to note he was invited though" but anal intercourse was considered the 'norm'...

I do agree that for an adult man to want to be the reciever would bring derision...but for the younger? no...

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 10:26:29 pm
SURELY you are not saying that all those teenage boys laid very still and never once enjoyed ANY of the sex...I would find that very hard to believe in context of the very passionate poems and odes we have from that time...

I can accept that it was not spoken of in polite society but the idea of the younger never once showing sexual interest a little far fetched...

one source I read, and of course I don't remember where....said that ORAL sex was frowned upon..."a man who was known to engage in oral sex was not offered the common cup at a banquet....interesting to note he was invited though" but anal intercourse was considered the 'norm'...

I do agree that for an adult man to want to be the receiver would bring derision...but for the younger? no...

I've just amended my previous post. Though it is quoted directly from The Oxford Companion, on second thought, after I'd posted it, I considered it best to delete it at this point in our discussion.

It's difficult for us to understand the ancient Greek mind, particularly when it comes to their sexual outlook. Suffice to say that what we colloquially refer to as "greek," perhaps wasn't necessarily a Greek practice.

Here's another quote from The Oxford Companion:

"The asymmetries structuring pederastic relationships reflected the underlying division of sexual labour. Whereas a boy, lacking his lover's erotic motivation, was not expected to play what the Greeks considered an 'active' sexual role - he was not, that is, to seek a sexual climax by inserting his penis into an orifice of his lover's body - a man was expected to do just that either by thrusting his penis between the boy's thighs (which was considered the most respectful method, because it did not violate the boy's bodily integrity) or by inserting it into his rectum. Respectable erotic relations between men and boys preserved the social fiction, to which some honourable lovers may even have adhered in actual practice, that sexual penetration of the boy took place only between the legs (the so-called intercrural position), never in the anus or - what was even worse - in the mouth. It was not a question of what people actually did in bed (the boy was conventionally assumed to be anally receptive to his older lover) so much as how they behaved when they were out of bed."

I think you were right in your earlier post, Jess. We shouldn't be discussing this so early in the book.


Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 10:43:36 pm
very good...then we will lay that aside and continue with chapter three....which starts out with one of the most beautiful evocative scenes I have ever read...the view that morning Alexias saw from the Acropolis....

the description of the ships sitting like a city of lights on the sea...the dawn breaking and details emerging from the mist...just beautiful...

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 10:46:12 pm
GOOD LORD HAVE MERCY!!  :o

Every time I stick my nose in here,... well, I just never know what I may find in here!

I hope you all are having a great evening.  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 10:46:38 pm
Kerry can you give us a background on the significance of a Herm? What are they for...what did they mean to the ancient people??

I've consulted both the Oxford Companion to Classical Civilisation and also the Oxford Classical Dictionary. In both volumes, the reference to Hermes is quite substantial. The reference to Hermae can be edited to read, "Hermae were set-up in public and at private doorways as protectors of houses and cities."
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 10:50:19 pm
GOOD LORD HAVE MERCY!!  :o

Every time I stick my nose in here,... well, I just never know what I may find in here!

I hope you all are having a great evening.  :)

Hey David!

It's getting on to 2pm on Sunday afternoon where I am. Glorious sunny high-Summer day here in Sydney. Cold where you are, I'm guessing? Snow?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 10:51:23 pm
GOOD LORD HAVE MERCY!!  :o

Every time I stick my nose in here,... well, I just never know what I may find in here!

I hope you all are having a great evening.  :)

what do you mean?? we are discussing a book..not like in your sad little thread where people ramble endlessly about anything....

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 10:55:00 pm
what do you mean?? we are discussing a book..not like in your sad little thread where people ramble endlessly about anything....

David, I'm sure Jess meant that with enormous fondness and good humour!!! LOL  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 13, 2007, 10:59:02 pm
I'm off to read chapter 3 now. Finally made it to page 11!!! Catch ya later!   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 13, 2007, 11:00:48 pm
Hey David!

It's getting on to 2pm on Sunday afternoon where I am. Glorious sunny high-Summer day here in Sydney. Cold where you are, I'm guessing? Snow?

Hey Kerry. Yeah, it's cold and rainy in Indianapolis. Ice and snow is on the way for tomorrow.  :(

Jess, you be nice to me or I'm gonna sabotage your club again!  :D

Okay. Back to your book discussion!

Talk at ya later!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 13, 2007, 11:02:31 pm
I'm off to read chapter 3 now. Finally made it to page 11!!! Catch ya later!   :)

oh no  :-X

you haven't read it yet!!

oh I am sorry! hope I didn't post any spoilers!!

(David knows I am teasing...be glad when he gets a copy and joins us for real!!)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 14, 2007, 06:57:23 am
very good...then we will lay that aside and continue with chapter three....which starts out with one of the most beautiful evocative scenes I have ever read...the view that morning Alexias saw from the Acropolis....

the description of the ships sitting like a city of lights on the sea...the dawn breaking and details emerging from the mist...just beautiful...

Breathtaking! Absolutely breathtaking! The view from the Acropolis with the first rays of the morning sun striking the spear-tip of Athene of the Vanguard. Can you see it? And the smell of frankincense on the air from the altars. The smell of the early morning dew. Wow, my senses are reeling!

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Acropolis2.jpg)

And at last, we now know Alexias' father's name - Myron son of Philokles (the same Philokles who dedicated the stele to uncle Alexias and Philon). But I prefer to think of him as "Myron the Beautiful." Sigh!

I was so happy for Alexias when I read of his excellent rapport with his stepmother. She sounds like a sweetheart.

This is quite a long chapter and was not necessarily an easy read in places (all that conspiratorial conversation back and forth, all those names being thrown about - you had to have your wits about you). It covered a lot. How would you like to attack it? Work methodically through from start to finish or pick interesting bits at random? Suggestions?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 14, 2007, 11:20:12 am
I think I would like to work thru bit by bit....but so much of it is connected it will stray I think!!

for example, the morning Alexias ran up to the Acropolis to see the fleet..his father had a party planned for the evening and he told his father that he would get the best flowers (for the garlands)  if he went early....he said about his father's reaction to him going alone..

"He laughed, knowing that I wanted an excuse to run about without my tutor; but he gave me leave, knowing too that at such an hour I should not meet too many temptations. It was well known that he in his young day was called Myron the Beautiful, just as you might say, Myron son of Philokles. But he thought, like all other fathers, that I was younger and sillier than he was at the same age."

which tells ME that Alexias was reaching an age where he was beginning to attract attention. Interesting that Athenian upper middle class treated their youths almost like some societies did girls! with chaperones!! LOL!

and when he was IN the marketplace buying hyacinth:

A man who was there choosing myrtle smiled at me and said "You should have bought those first, Hyakinthos."  

it appears our 'ugly' duckling has changed!!

and Alexias's reaction?

"But I raised my eyebrows and went on without speaking."

such a proper young man...well brought up! you'll not find the son of Myron chatting up men in the marketplace!!

 :laugh:

like I said things begin to tie together now...getting more complicated...(don't you love it?)

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 14, 2007, 11:27:29 am
which this exchange between him and his father tells me that they had a fairly good relationship...

Alexias obviously has excellent manners and his father is kind 'benevolent' to him....he 'knows' that Alexias wants to 'slip the leash' and he evaluates the situation and lets him go..and Alexias proves himself by both being responsible with his time and his interaction with the man...Myron has done a good job with Alexias we have to give him the credit...

Note also we find that our 'ugly duckling' is a competitive runner now...imagine him at fifteen ....lithe and light...long legged...slender...turning now into a charmer himself!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 15, 2007, 01:01:01 am
such a proper young man...well brought up! you'll not find the son of Myron chatting up men in the marketplace!!

Forgive my inattention. A busy weekend and an equally busy day at the coalface today.

Particularly loved your succinct appraisal, above. Too true! Made me laugh!

Alexias appears to be developing into a handsome young man. He is certainly attracting attention. I particularly enjoyed the reference to the two men at his father’s dinner party. Both were shamelessly flirting with him. Alexias liked the chap who was polite and courteous, but he hated the “groper,” who put his hand up his tunic. So we know he’s not a flirt or a sycophant, who leads men on. He has principles – morals.

I was amused by the reference to the slave/chaperone, who came across as an old-maid-aunt-type-character, guarding his charge from the advances of potentially amorous suitors. Literally shooing them away! He may have to be reined in, though, ‘cause he has a tendency to also shoo away the cuties!

Certainly, the ugly duckling has been transfigured into a gorgeous young swan.

The relationship between father and son has changed significantly since chapter 2. But then again, a lot has transpired since then. The dreaded Rhodian has gone and in her place we have sweet, young Arete. Chalk and cheese!

Miron and Alexias are actually communicating in this chapter. Conversing. Sharing. Miron is proud to show his son off to his friends in the safety of the home, but careful to guard Alexias from harm in public. A good father.

More later.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 15, 2007, 01:04:26 am
<-------- is evesdropping.  :D
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 15, 2007, 01:05:07 am
the 'groper' Kritias...truly scum...make a note of him, he will show up again!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: David In Indy on January 15, 2007, 01:07:09 am
the 'groper' Kritias...truly scum...make a note of him, he will show up again!!

 ???

Huh?

If you want me to leave Jess, just say so!  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 15, 2007, 01:10:22 am
since you bring up the party...I loved Alexias response when told he would serve the men...

"'Who I?' I was much affronted; I had never been asked to serve tables, except at public dinners where lads of good family do it by custom. 'Are the slaves sick or what?'"

how typical!! teenagers are teenagers everywhere and anytime!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 15, 2007, 01:24:05 am
and he already knew Kritias...who seemed to already have a bit of a reputation among the young men...

"I was old enough to have received some attentions from men, while still young enough to think them rather absurd; as, for that matter, the kind of person who chases young boys usually is. But I had never been inclined to laugh at Kritias"

At the party Kritias waits til Myron is looking away...

"Kritias moved his cup a little, so that the wine spilled down my clothes. On this he put his hand under the hem of my tunic in such a way that, to everyone but me, he would have seemed to be feeling the cloth"

how arrogant and slimy!! right there in front of everyone he is groping this teen...and putting him in such a position he can't say anything without causing a scene.

what does this tell us about Kritias? He comes from a life of privilege...he feels that he is above the rules that others have to follow...that he views other people as things to be used for his own ends...

but I am probably coloring my opinion by what is coming rather than what is in this chapter!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 15, 2007, 06:32:55 am
<-------- is evesdropping.  :D

David you are very welcome to evesdrop any time you choose!  :)  Better still, why not grab a copy of the book and join in?!  :laugh: (PS - I am about to scoot over to look through your "serious" blog and hope to find pics of Oreo and Cody there)

Jess, I will be studying chapter 3 in depth tomorrow (photocopy and highlighter in hand!) and hope to post more, soon after. I will also be commenting on your two most recent posts at that time. Would you like to discuss a favourite scene? The Lysis / Socrates connection, perhaps?   :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 15, 2007, 07:59:30 am
ok...a bit of background first (for David the dropper of eaves)

at the first of the chapter Alexias arises early to go see the fleet about to embark on an invasion of Syracuse and to purchase flowers for a dinner party his father is giving that evening...he left in the dark and when he returns it is light and he finds the Herm out front of the house has been vandalized!! A troubling event...his father takes one look and says the house must be purified! About this time they hear a commotion; turns out several houses have had their Herms vandalized....

the city is in an uproar, this is a very bad omen to happen right on the eve of the launch of the new campaign....

Who has committed this outrage??! some say it is the Spartans, some that the Herms had been damaged here and there and no one noticed, some that this or that group had done it; and some accused Alkibiades (remember?? the young god who had once relieved himself in the garden of Alexias's house during a dinner party?)

Everyone is abuzz wondering who has brought this bad luck down on the city....

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 15, 2007, 08:39:23 am
but Alexias must go off to school....everyone is ill at ease and gossiping...he is relieved when it is time to burn off some energy in the gymnasium....they go out and strip off (remember this is Greece and all exercise is taken nude)...everyone is talking and yelling so loudly no one can hear so their instructor takes a few boys off to coach and set the rest to practising their wrestling moves.

Men who are not exercising, are strolling around the grounds arguing and debating who has committed this horrible outrage of destroying the Herms...Alkiabides is named as a possible suspect...gossip is that he broke the Herms in arrogance and a drunken spree...

(a bit of background...Socrates was Alkibiades's teacher, and people blame him for anything Alkibiades does wrong....he is not one to deal lightly with BS and tends to anger people who can not follow his logic so he is not well liked by the general populace)

So Alexias sees Socrates involved in a loud argument with a man and goes over to stretch his ears...the argument gets heated and the man gives Socrates a ringing blow on the head...everyone is outraged but Socrates is not...he nods at the man and says

"Thank you. Now we can all see the force of your arguement"

the man raises his fist to strike again and out from Socrates friends steps a young man...

"and caught the man by the wrist. I knew who it was, not only from seeing him with Socrates or about the city, but because there was a bronze statue of him in Mikkos's hallway, done when he was about sixteen. He was a former pupil, who had won a crown for wrestling, while still in school, at the Panathenaic Games. He was said too to have been among the notable beauties of his year, which one could still believe with no trouble. I saw his name every day, since it was written on the base of the statue; Lysis, son of Demokrates of OExone"

he calmly used a wrestling hold to force the man back and tumbled him down the steps and into the dirt of the wrestling grounds...much to the delight of the boys...

the men went about their conversation...and Alexias stood admiring Lysis...

then Lysis turned and saw him...

Kerry??

would you like to cover this scene for us??

LOL!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 06:53:58 am
since you bring up the party...I loved Alexias response when told he would serve the men...

"'Who I?' I was much affronted; I had never been asked to serve tables, except at public dinners where lads of good family do it by custom. 'Are the slaves sick or what?'"

how typical!! teenagers are teenagers everywhere and anytime!!

A mother’s insight LOL  :)

(I was really looking forward to illustrating my posts tonight with some lovely pics harvested from the Net. Alas, PhotoBucket is closed for maintenance!!!  :-\  Maybe tomorrow)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 06:56:04 am
and he already knew Kritias...who seemed to already have a bit of a reputation among the young men...

"I was old enough to have received some attentions from men, while still young enough to think them rather absurd; as, for that matter, the kind of person who chases young boys usually is. But I had never been inclined to laugh at Kritias"

At the party Kritias waits til Myron is looking away...

"Kritias moved his cup a little, so that the wine spilled down my clothes. On this he put his hand under the hem of my tunic in such a way that, to everyone but me, he would have seemed to be feeling the cloth"

how arrogant and slimy!! right there in front of everyone he is groping this teen...and putting him in such a position he can't say anything without causing a scene.

what does this tell us about Kritias? He comes from a life of privilege...he feels that he is above the rules that others have to follow...that he views other people as things to be used for his own ends...

but I am probably coloring my opinion by what is coming rather than what is in this chapter!!

Yes, I agree. Kritias is certainly a scum-bucket of the highest order!!! However, having said that, I also find him to be a somewhat contradictory character. He is certainly arrogant, and he’s a hypocrite, too. But he is also “gracious” and steeped in the social niceties, probably because he is so rich and has always been accustomed to the best. He had not belonged to the Sunhorses Club for long, and was “considered something of a prize”  by the other members. I’m sure this knowledge wouldn’t’ve depleted his staggeringly enormous ego in any way! He wears the veil of the aesthete, whilst at the same time surreptitiously groping young men under their tunics. I couldn’t help but draw comparisons from the paedophilia scandal within the Catholic Church a couple of years ago (and I can make this comment because I am a Catholic – much as I’d love to be able to say I “believe in the Pentecost” like dear Jack’s Mama LOL). What made the act all the more despicable was because it was perpetrated by men in positions of trust. And I am appalled that this cretinous Kritias comes from the admirable Sokrates’ “camp” (for want of a better word! LOL):

“He was not much above thirty then, but already affected the philosopher in mantle and beard. He had a hungry-looking face, with the skin stretched tight on the cheekbones, but was not bad looking apart from his thinness.”

One slimey, sneaky bastard!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 07:00:31 am
ok...a bit of background first (for David the dropper of eaves)

at the first of the chapter Alexias arises early to go see the fleet about to embark on an invasion of Syracuse and to purchase flowers for a dinner party his father is giving that evening...he left in the dark and when he returns it is light and he finds the Herm out front of the house has been vandalized!! A troubling event...his father takes one look and says the house must be purified! About this time they hear a commotion; turns out several houses have had their Herms vandalized....

the city is in an uproar, this is a very bad omen to happen right on the eve of the launch of the new campaign....

Who has committed this outrage??! some say it is the Spartans, some that the Herms had been damaged here and there and no one noticed, some that this or that group had done it; and some accused Alkibiades (remember?? the young god who had once relieved himself in the garden of Alexias's house during a dinner party?)

Everyone is abuzz wondering who has brought this bad luck down on the city....

Just as we all know what tragically befell Sokrates, I also happen to know, from the sources, of Alkibiades’ fate. But I’m not reading ahead with TLOTW, so I’m going to find it interesting to see how MR describes these events.

Alkibiades is described as a dazzling character. A show pony. A peacock. As radiant as an incarnate God. We know that Alexias, for example, mistook him for the God Hermes! And he inspires either love or hate in those who know him (which appears to be most of Athens). There don’t appear to be any half measures with Alkibiades.

I personally saw the smashing of the Herms as slightly more than a “troubling event.”  The ancient Greeks were deeply religious people, who loved and respected their Gods. This was an heretical act of sacrilege most foul. It could be likened to a church burning in our own time. Or the desecration of a church altar. What gave it an added troubled dimension was that they were on the verge of war with Syracuse. And it was considered that if the sacrilege had been perpetrated by someone from within the City, the Gods would judge them accordingly and side with the enemy in the war. There was a precedent. Read your Homer, lad!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 07:13:03 am
but Alexias must go off to school....everyone is ill at ease and gossiping...he is relieved when it is time to burn off some energy in the gymnasium....they go out and strip off (remember this is Greece and all exercise is taken nude)...everyone is talking and yelling so loudly no one can hear so their instructor takes a few boys off to coach and set the rest to practising their wrestling moves.

Men who are not exercising, are strolling around the grounds arguing and debating who has committed this horrible outrage of destroying the Herms...Alkiabides is named as a possible suspect...gossip is that he broke the Herms in arrogance and a drunken spree...

(a bit of background...Socrates was Alkibiades's teacher, and people blame him for anything Alkibiades does wrong....he is not one to deal lightly with BS and tends to anger people who can not follow his logic so he is not well liked by the general populace)

So Alexias sees Socrates involved in a loud argument with a man and goes over to stretch his ears...the argument gets heated and the man gives Socrates a ringing blow on the head...everyone is outraged but Socrates is not...he nods at the man and says

"Thank you. Now we can all see the force of your arguement"

the man raises his fist to strike again and out from Socrates friends steps a young man...

"and caught the man by the wrist. I knew who it was, not only from seeing him with Socrates or about the city, but because there was a bronze statue of him in Mikkos's hallway, done when he was about sixteen. He was a former pupil, who had won a crown for wrestling, while still in school, at the Panathenaic Games. He was said too to have been among the notable beauties of his year, which one could still believe with no trouble. I saw his name every day, since it was written on the base of the statue; Lysis, son of Demokrates of OExone"

he calmly used a wrestling hold to force the man back and tumbled him down the steps and into the dirt of the wrestling grounds...much to the delight of the boys...

the men went about their conversation...and Alexias stood admiring Lysis...

then Lysis turned and saw him...

Kerry??

would you like to cover this scene for us??

LOL!

I would be pleased to.

There is a great deal going on here. Jess has already described the turmoil in the city. Because Sokrates is an associate of Alkibiades, and Alkibiades is being blamed by many for the desecration of the Herms; ergo, Sokrates, through association, is also being linked to the violation. Sokrates has a reputation for not necessarily being a particularly “religious” man. Because he is so publicly out there, in the agora, he is attracting attention and abuse.

Let us not underestimate the enormity of this despicable outrage. It is an aggressive, forthright attack on the Gods - by mere mortals! Far more serious than common vandalism. There’s a great deal of tension in the City. People are very stressed. Tempers are at boiling point. How will the Gods get even?

A man has lost his temper with Sokrates and is shouting at him. Sokrates holds his own, shouting back, though also using reason, trying to convince the man that Alkibiades should be considered innocent until proven guilty, “The law of evidence for instance?” says Sokrates.

I smiled when the hot-head called Sokrates a cunning snake who could argue black white. I have no doubt that this is true, on both counts!

The man strikes Sokrates. How does Sokrates react? Does he reciprocate in kind or verbally? No. In reality, Socrates was known for his sense of humour and MR obviously knew this from her research, because she provided Sokrates with these words, “Thank you. Now we can all see the force of your argument.”  It made me laugh. Sokrates the pacifist, turning the other cheek, looong before Jesus Christ or Mahatma Ghandi!

At this point, we are introduced to Lysis for the first time. He is in the company of Sokrates and comes to his defence. A noble young man. And we know he didn’t lose his temper because we are told that even as he was repelling the attacker’s advance, he retained a calm demeanour, “as if he were sacrificing.” I loved that!

When Kriton tries to convince Sokrates to sue the street thug, Sokrates responds, “Last year an ass bolted in the street and kicked you; but I don’t recall you suing him.”  Priceless!

And he chastises Lysis also with, “Just when he was starting to doubt the force of his argument, you re-stated it for him with eloquence and conviction.”  That put the young buck, Lysis, right back in his place!   

Though there are no overt fireworks between Alexias and Lysis at this meeting, there is a great deal of simmering underlying sexual tension between them.

This is what we are told about Lysis:

* Alexias had seen him with Sokrates in the past. I’m guessing that Alexias thought he stood-out from the crowd.

* A bronze statue had been made of him when he was 16.

* Alexias saw his name “every day” on the base of the statue, so he must have been admiring it.

* Alexias comments that someone should do a new statue of him now that he is a man. This means to me that Alexias thinks he is beautiful and should be immortalised in bronze.

* He won a crown for wrestling.

* He was “among the notable beauties of his year, which one could still believe without trouble.”

* He was tall and slim.

* He is gracious and courteous. Well-bred. I know this because after he has defended Sokrates, we are told that he looks at Sokrates, “as if with apology for his intrusion.“  

* Alexias has seldom heard his voice (could be somewhat like Ennis in this regard?!), except at the horse races, when his voice can be heard over everyone else. Alexias has made a point of listening for his voice! There are sparks!

* Lysis is a man of fashion. Metrosexual? He has the new look - a shaved face!

* I love this description which I am compelled to quote verbatim, "His hair, which he wore short, lay half-curled against his head, and being mingled fair and brown, gleamed like a bronze helmet inlaid with gold.”   He is beautiful, indeed!

* The scene when Lysis turns around and catches Alexias staring at him is particularly charged with sexual dynamism, “He smiled at me however, as if to say, ‘Come nearer, then, if you like; no one will eat you‘.”   Delightful.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 16, 2007, 09:08:40 am
very well stated...I LOVE to read your posts!

running late this morning and will post more later!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 05:58:35 pm
Mary Renault throws certain words into the mix of her narrative which we are expected to understand. And it is often easy to skim-over them and miss an important point.

The very first sentence of chapter 3 is an example:

"When I and the other boys of my age became ephebes . . ."

What is an "ephebe"? It is important that we know this, before we can progress further.

Here's what Wikipedia has to say:

"Ephebos (often in the plural epheboi), also anglicised as ephebe (plural: ephebi), is a Greek word for an adolescent age group or a social status reserved for that age in Antiquity.

Though the word can simply refer to the adolescent age of young men of training age, its main use is for the members, exclusively from that age group, of an official institution (ephebia) that saw to building them into citizens, but especially training them as soldiers, sometimes already sent into the field; the Greek city state (polis) mainly depended, as the Roman republic before Marius's reform, on its militia of citizens for defence."

Ephebe-
(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/EphebosinSicilianMuseum.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 06:42:37 pm
Alkibiades was a real historical personage who lived in Athens 450-404BC. He really was as handsome as Mary Renault describes him. Here's the proof -

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Alcibiades450-404BC.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 16, 2007, 07:26:06 pm
and while we are talking real historical characters we can't pass up Alexias's classmate and friend, Xenophon...anyone that has ever had dealings with horses will recognise that name!

MR is quite the name dropper!!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 16, 2007, 10:39:25 pm
and while we are talking real historical characters we can't pass up Alexias's classmate and friend, Xenophon...anyone that has ever had dealings with horses will recognise that name!

MR is quite the name dropper!!

Xenophon
427-355 BC

(this bust rendered later in life)
(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Xenophon.jpg)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 17, 2007, 08:00:11 am
I was delighted to read that Alexias chose to sing a love ballad about legendary lovers, Harmodios and Aristogeiton at the dinner party. A beautiful song, sung by a dazzling young man, in illustrious company. Alas, Kritias has to destroy the charmed atmosphere conjured-up by Alexias and his lyre, by making a licentious remark.

Mary Renault will again write about Harmodios and Aristogeiton in a later book, “The Persian Boy,”  where the story of their tragic love is told through dialogue between Alexander and Bagoas:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Harmodios.gif)

 “Al’sander,” I said, “who were Harmodios and Aristogeiton?”

“Lovers,” he said sleepily. “Famous Athenian lovers. You must have seen their statues on the terrace at Susa. Xerxes took them from Athens.”

“The ones with the daggers? The man and boy?”

“Yes. It’s in Thukydides . . . What’s the matter?”

“What were the daggers for?”

“Killing the tyrant, Hippias. Though they never did it. They only got his brother, which made him more tyrannical.” He roused himself to tell the story. “But they died with honour. The Athenians set great store by them. I’ll send them back sometime. Very old statues. Stiff. The beautiful Harmodios, he’s not fit to do up your shoes.”

A great compliment to Bagoas, from Alexander. Harmodios, knows for his legendary beauty, “not fit to do up (Bagoas’) shoes.” Bagoas must have been quite a heart-breaker!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 17, 2007, 08:24:22 am
She visits the story again in "The Praise Singer" where she tells the story in great detail from the viewpoint of a contemporary....

If you haven't read it; it will break your heart

"The youth had killed for pride, but the man for love: from anger at the hurt to his beloved, and that one man should have the power to do it; from fear that he had the power to take the beloved away."
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 17, 2007, 05:01:53 pm
She visits the story again in "The Praise Singer" where she tells the story in great detail from the viewpoint of a contemporary....

If you haven't read it; it will break your heart

"The youth had killed for pride, but the man for love: from anger at the hurt to his beloved, and that one man should have the power to do it; from fear that he had the power to take the beloved away."

 :'(       :'(       :'(       :'(       :'(       :'(
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 17, 2007, 07:10:17 pm
Another word, thrown into the mix by Mary Renault is “hoplite.” She says, of the  forthcoming war with  Syracuse, “many of the knights, not to be left behind, had volunteered as hoplites.”  So, what exactly was a hoplite?

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Hoplite.jpg)

“The Hoplite was a heavy metalband that was the central focus of warfare in Ancient Greece. The word hoplite (Greek ὁπλίτης, hoplitēs) derives from hoplon (ὅπλον, plural hopla, ὅπλα) meaning an item of armor or equipment and consequently the entire equipment of the hoplite (but not specifically the circular shield, which is sometimes incorrectly referred to as a hoplon, though it was in fact called an aspis). These soldiers probably first appeared in the late seventh century B.C. They were a citizen-militia, and so were armed as spearmen, which are relatively easy to equip and maintain; they were primarily drawn from the middle class, who could afford the cost of the armaments. Almost all the famous men of ancient Greece, even philosophers and playwrights, fought as hoplites at some point in their lives.
Since the hoplites were a militia force and did not receive permanent wages, campaigns were short and mainly confined to the summer. Armies marched directly to their target. There, the defenders could hide behind city walls, in which case the attackers generally had to content themselves with ravaging the countryside (as siegecraft was undeveloped), or meet them on the field. Battles were usually set piece and intended to be decisive. These battles were short, bloody, and brutal, and thus required a high degree of discipline. Both forces lined up on a level field, usually in a rough phalanx formation around eight ranks deep (though this varied). Other troops were less important; hippeis (cavalry) generally protected the flanks, when present at all, and both light infantry and missile troops were negligible. The best known hoplites were the Spartans, who were trained from birth to become magnificent warriors.”
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 17, 2007, 07:19:03 pm
:'(       :'(       :'(       :'(       :'(       :'(

You read "The Praise Singer"??

it is very bittersweet...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 17, 2007, 08:47:30 pm
One of the reviews for this book says that Alexias is growing up in a time when society is being torn apart by forces they barely see or understand...

in this chapter we begin to see it....and I can't help but compare it to the US today...

They look back on the greatness of past generations and you see some still clinging to the old manners..while a new movement is afoot to bring down the autocracy of the past..ok..I think that is not the right word!! LOL...the upper crust, the leaders..

Alexias hears an interesting arguement speaking of equality...

"Shall I tell you the sin of Alkibiades? He was born too late to into a City of little men. Why did the mob banish Aristides the Just? Because they were sick of hearing his virtue praised. The admitted it. It shamed them. Now they hate to see beauty and wit, valour and birth and wealth, united in one man. What keeps the democracy alive at all but the hatred of excellence; the desire of the base to see no head higher than their own?"

"Not so, by the gods. It is justice, the gift of Zeus to men."

"Justice? If the gods give a man wisdom or forethought, or skill, must he be brought down as if had got them by theft? We shall be laming the best athletes soon, at the demand of the worst, in the name of justice. Or some citizen with pockmarks and a squint will lay a complaint against such a boy as this" (here he pointed suddenly at me) "and his nose will be broken, I suppose, for justice's sake."

I see parellels to our own times...the schools that have banned tag or spelling bees to 'protect' childrens egos...

even handicapped parking spots for an ever widening group of complaints and ailments...

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 18, 2007, 08:49:25 pm
"Shall I tell you the sin of Alkibiades? He was born too late to into a City of little men. Why did the mob banish Aristides the Just? Because they were sick of hearing his virtue praised. The admitted it. It shamed them. Now they hate to see beauty and wit, valour and birth and wealth, united in one man. What keeps the democracy alive at all but the hatred of excellence; the desire of the base to see no head higher than their own?"

Regarding Alkibiades – this had particular relevance for me as an Australian. All Australians suffer from a peculiar national malady/trait, which is referred to in this country as “Tall Poppy Syndrome.” I feel confident enough to say that the majority of Australians suffer from it. Imagine a garden bed with poppies growing. Further imagine the taller poppies, proudly standing high above all the other shorter poppies. Now imagine a naughty child coming along and maliciously knocking-off the heads of the tall poppies, for no other reason than because they are taller than the rest.

It’s similar to the piece in the Bible (and forgive me if I am unsuccessful in achieving a verbatim quote here – been a long time since I last read it) about a prophet not being loved/venerated in his own home town.

Or another example, closer to home for me. I paint recreationally (oils on canvas). I usually get positive, complimentary remarks about my paintings, from people I barely know. However, from my family and “friends” I get nothing but negativity.

Australians are known for knocking the heads off our most famous tall poppies. We can’t help ourselves! It’s almost a national hobby. Goes waaaaay back to our convict origins, I guess, where we had no respect for authority (some might argue we still don’t!)

And I’m seeing that this is the way the Athenians are reacting to Alkibiades. He is their most dazzling, tallest poppy, and they’re determined to knock him down to size.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 18, 2007, 08:54:44 pm
"Justice? If the gods give a man wisdom or forethought, or skill, must he be brought down as if had got them by theft? We shall be laming the best athletes soon, at the demand of the worst, in the name of justice. Or some citizen with pockmarks and a squint will lay a complaint against such a boy as this" (here he pointed suddenly at me) "and his nose will be broken, I suppose, for justice's sake."[/color]

I see parellels to our own times...the schools that have banned tag or spelling bees to 'protect' childrens egos...

even handicapped parking spots for an ever widening group of complaints and ailments...

This made me laugh, when I read it. I’m sure “political correctness” was not even invented when MR wrote TLOTW. I hope political correctness (“PC” for short) isn’t another uniquely Australian term. Let me know if you don’t know what PC is.

Not only is MR referring to PC here, long before the term was coined; she is also sending up the out-of-control monster that PC has become.

I’m not sure about elsewhere in the world, but here in Australia PC is everywhere! And we are all aware of its precepts and what can befall us if we fail to adhere to them One must be constantly aware of one’s English usage, as well as one’s body language. If you moderately offend against PC, you risk only a slight reprimand. However, if you make a biiiiiiig PC boo-boo, you could find yourself before the courts. For example, you are not permitted to say to a woman in the office, “You’re blouse is a lovely colour.” She can sue you for sexual harassment. Or, on a lighter side, (and this has actually happened to me), it is no longer appropriate for a man to be a gentleman and open a door for a lady. He might find himself being told, most aggressively, “Hey, I’ll open my own door, mate. I’m just as good as you are!”

This particular quote from LTOTW, above, reminded me that we are all now forced to use the ramps at the entrances of public buildings, which are installed there to provide wheelchair access for a tiny minority. It is good that the ramps are there (I suspect many architects may not agree) for the disabled, even though it could be viewed by some as a case of “over-kill,” forcing us all to use them.

Breaking all our noses to comply with the pockmarks and squints of the few?

Am I being cruel? Don’t mean to be. Mea culpa!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 18, 2007, 11:05:35 pm
As Jess has noted previously, there’s more to Renault than meets the eye. It’s not all about ancient Greece. It’s topical, too. For example:

“As for justice,” Theramenes said, “they have as much notion of it as the guts of a mullet. I tell you, my dear Myron, this very night I could raise a drunken brawl here, strike you before all these witnesses, wound your slaves; and if you would only come to court looking and behaving like a gentleman, I undertake you would lose your case. I, you see, should put on the old tunic I wear on my farm, and have a speech written for an honest poor fellow, which I should con till it came like nature to me. I should bring my children along, borrowing some little ones as the youngest is ten; and we should all rub our eyes with onion. I assure you, in the end it would be you who would pay the fine, for plying your simple friend with stronger stuff than he could afford at home, and trying to profit by it. They would spit on you as you left.”  

When I read this, I immediately thought of the despicable “gay rage defence,” whereby someone could quite assuredly and with impunity, take the life of a gay man, and not suffer the consequences under law. Walk free! How? Their defence case would state that they were propositioned for sexual favours by the said gay man (even when this wasn’t the case); that the defendant was so traumatised by these “unnatural advances,” he took the life of the gay man, in an attempt to defend himself against being violated. It was self defence, his attorney would claim.

This actually happened many times. Murderers walked free. It took the judicial system a long time to realise that it wasn’t self-defence at all. It was murder.

Mary Renault was a gay woman. I wonder if she is eluding to “gay rage defence” here.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 19, 2007, 12:40:47 am
You reminded me of the case in Florida, I believe...a teacher had sex with a thirteen year old...she showed up in court dressed like a little girl all ribbons and curls...

her attorney argued she was too pretty to go to jail. They let her go...

How often do we see defendents that when they were arrested; were dressed like thugs and show up in court dressed for church...and the jury buys it... :P
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 19, 2007, 03:26:27 am
I meant to post this some time ago and became distracted elsewhere (that's too much fanfic for you, Kerry!)  ::)

There were a wide variety of Herms to choose from.

Here are some:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Herm-Variety.png)

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on January 20, 2007, 07:27:30 pm
Thanks Kerry for the pictures you are posting. They really help me to understand the MR's references. :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 25, 2007, 05:23:06 am
Love your Herms Kerry, I wonder if our modern habit of installing garden "statues" / birdtables etc stem from this?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 25, 2007, 06:58:33 am
Love your Herms Kerry, I wonder if our modern habit of installing garden "statues" / birdtables etc stem from this?

Hi ya, Zander. It's possibly the case, but probably unlikely LOL. The pic of Herms posted earlier is a somewhat sanitised version of what they actually looked like. In Athens, they were usually a pretty standard variation on a somewhat elementary theme:
1. Four-sided plinth
2. Head of the God Hermes on top
3. Projections at the shoulders, on which to rest wreaths
4. Colossal great vertical rampant phallus emerged from the plinth

They were placed at the entrances to homes and cities as protective entities.

Since posting the last pic, I have had greater success in locating a more accurate representation of what an Athenian plinth actually looked like:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/GodPriape.jpg)


Though this is a somewhat flippant, homoerotic representation of a sculptor's "relationship" with his Herm, it is, in reality, more likely to be what a plinth really did look like.

I suspect you would probably get very strange looks from your neighbours if you installed an Athenian Herm at your garden gate LOL!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 25, 2007, 07:22:53 pm
I would be pleased to.

There is a great deal going on here. Jess has already described the turmoil in the city. Because Sokrates is an associate of Alkibiades, and Alkibiades is being blamed by many for the desecration of the Herms; ergo, Sokrates, through association, is also being linked to the violation. Sokrates has a reputation for not necessarily being a particularly “religious” man. Because he is so publicly out there, in the agora, he is attracting attention and abuse.

Let us not underestimate the enormity of this despicable outrage. It is an aggressive, forthright attack on the Gods - by mere mortals! Far more serious than common vandalism. There’s a great deal of tension in the City. People are very stressed. Tempers are at boiling point. How will the Gods get even?

A man has lost his temper with Sokrates and is shouting at him. Sokrates holds his own, shouting back, though also using reason, trying to convince the man that Alkibiades should be considered innocent until proven guilty, “The law of evidence for instance?” says Sokrates.

I smiled when the hot-head called Sokrates a cunning snake who could argue black white. I have no doubt that this is true, on both counts!

The man strikes Sokrates. How does Sokrates react? Does he reciprocate in kind or verbally? No. In reality, Socrates was known for his sense of humour and MR obviously knew this from her research, because she provided Sokrates with these words, “Thank you. Now we can all see the force of your argument.”  It made me laugh. Sokrates the pacifist, turning the other cheek, looong before Jesus Christ or Mahatma Ghandi!

At this point, we are introduced to Lysis for the first time. He is in the company of Sokrates and comes to his defence. A noble young man. And we know he didn’t lose his temper because we are told that even as he was repelling the attacker’s advance, he retained a calm demeanour, “as if he were sacrificing.” I loved that!

When Kriton tries to convince Sokrates to sue the street thug, Sokrates responds, “Last year an ass bolted in the street and kicked you; but I don’t recall you suing him.”  Priceless!

And he chastises Lysis also with, “Just when he was starting to doubt the force of his argument, you re-stated it for him with eloquence and conviction.”  That put the young buck, Lysis, right back in his place!   

Though there are no overt fireworks between Alexias and Lysis at this meeting, there is a great deal of simmering underlying sexual tension between them.

This is what we are told about Lysis:

* Alexias had seen him with Sokrates in the past. I’m guessing that Alexias thought he stood-out from the crowd.

* A bronze statue had been made of him when he was 16.

* Alexias saw his name “every day” on the base of the statue, so he must have been admiring it.

* Alexias comments that someone should do a new statue of him now that he is a man. This means to me that Alexias thinks he is beautiful and should be immortalised in bronze.

* He won a crown for wrestling.

* He was “among the notable beauties of his year, which one could still believe without trouble.”

* He was tall and slim.

* He is gracious and courteous. Well-bred. I know this because after he has defended Sokrates, we are told that he looks at Sokrates, “as if with apology for his intrusion.“  

* Alexias has seldom heard his voice (could be somewhat like Ennis in this regard?!), except at the horse races, when his voice can be heard over everyone else. Alexias has made a point of listening for his voice! There are sparks!

* Lysis is a man of fashion. Metrosexual? He has the new look - a shaved face!

* I love this description which I am compelled to quote verbatim, "His hair, which he wore short, lay half-curled against his head, and being mingled fair and brown, gleamed like a bronze helmet inlaid with gold.”   He is beautiful, indeed!

* The scene when Lysis turns around and catches Alexias staring at him is particularly charged with sexual dynamism, “He smiled at me however, as if to say, ‘Come nearer, then, if you like; no one will eat you‘.”   Delightful.


Now I do not see that as Socrates rebuking Lysis at all...I saw it as him giving Lysis a off the cuff compliment on his calm repulse of the hooligan..hmm...different perspectives!!


I think it was Zander who asked about gay people in MRs books...I think that this is one of the examples of how she presents them. In our time I think Alexias would be gay...judged by his own time he was well within the 'norm' for sexual behaviour for a young man in those circumstances...he obviously had some feelings for an attractive man. (Did he memorize EVERY name on EVERYstatue? I think not...and he mentions he knew Lysis by sight and by the sound of his voice....)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 26, 2007, 05:49:31 am
Hi ya, Zander. It's possibly the case, but probably unlikely LOL. The pic of Herms posted earlier is a somewhat sanitised version of what they actually looked like. In Athens, they were usually a pretty standard variation on a somewhat elementary theme:
1. Four-sided plinth
2. Head of the God Hermes on top
3. Projections at the shoulders, on which to rest wreaths
4. Colossal great vertical rampant phallus emerged from the plinth

They were placed at the entrances to homes and cities as protective entities.

Since posting the last pic, I have had greater success in locating a more accurate representation of what an Athenian plinth actually looked like:

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/GodPriape.jpg)


Though this is a somewhat flippant, homoerotic representation of a sculptor's "relationship" with his Herm, it is, in reality, more likely to be what a plinth really did look like.

I suspect you would probably get very strange looks from your neighbours if you installed an Athenian Herm at your garden gate LOL!

I did see some remanants and paintings that represented them in Pompei and Hurculaneum.  We have a Hercules (nude of course) in the garden and everyone coming to the house has to pass it - that and two garden gnomes one mooning and one flashing  ;D I think I may have a little greek in me (no lets not go there  ;D)

I did like the picture you found though  ;) Alexis (not to give the game away) describes the statue of his father so that particular herm must have been more detailed than a simple post - I don't think Alexias was commenting on te size / quality of a rampant phallus as he recognised the statue and I don't think it would have been from being able to identify his fathers penis (well not in that state unless MR knows something we don't)  :o
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 26, 2007, 08:13:54 am
SOMEBODY has been reading ahead!  >:( :laugh:
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 27, 2007, 04:26:58 pm
SOMEBODY has been reading ahead!  >:( :laugh:
Slap my wrists I read this ages ago  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 27, 2007, 10:25:56 pm
Slap my wrists I read this ages ago  ;)

*eyes Zander carefully*

hmmm don't think so..you may like it too much....

 :laugh: :laugh: :-X
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on January 29, 2007, 12:12:02 pm
*eyes Zander carefully*

hmmm don't think so..you may like it too much....

 :laugh: :laugh: :-X
Not quite (but near  ;D)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 29, 2007, 01:46:11 pm
well since apparently I am the only person left in the club...(since Kerry has wandered off for more um...'interesting' threads...

so I am just going to mention one last scene and then I am off to the next chapter!

Myron is giving a party for his supper club at his home...Alexias is serving the wine...we mentioned this earlier

When Kritias gropes Alexias there is one man who sees....Kritias takes notice and takes his vengence a few moments later..(no one should DARE to disapprove of him and his will; better to preemptively destroy a possible enemy)

Tellis has fallen on hard time and can no longer afford to host the party or pay his dues...as the debate continues about who may have damaged the Herms and brought bad luck on the city; he speaks up in defence of Alkibiades "No, Myron is right, it was planned to a hair and not be Aldkibiades"

Kritias answers him smoothly "No one, I am sure, will think worse of Tellis for supporting his host"

The men had been drinking, and were full of their affairs. But I, who was watching, saw Tellis' face stiffen, as at the first bite of a sword-thrust. When you have thought yourself among friends, who have given the best proof of their liking of your company, it strikes hard to be called a sycophant for the first time. I knew he would never sup with the club again. I went over to him, and filled his cup, knowing no other way to show how I felt; and he smiled at me, trying to greet me as he always did. Our eyes met above the wine-cup, like men's who have picked up the sound of a lost battle before the trumpet blows the retreat.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on January 29, 2007, 01:50:56 pm
oops...one more thing from this chapter!!

Alexias now has a stepmother...

Myron married her when she was fifteen...making her only eight years older than Alexias. She was small and dark (Myron being fond it seemed of dark women) and the only child of a well respected Athenian who had given her a great deal of freedom. She was intelligent and interested in the world around her. Myron would rebuke her for her interest in politics but Alexias told her everything....they were very close and she gave him great comfort after the tyranny of the Rhodian!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 30, 2007, 11:16:28 pm
well since apparently I am the only person left in the club...(since Kerry has wandered off for more um...'interesting' threads...

so I am just going to mention one last scene and then I am off to the next chapter!

Myron is giving a party for his supper club at his home...Alexias is serving the wine...we mentioned this earlier

When Kritias gropes Alexias there is one man who sees....Kritias takes notice and takes his vengence a few moments later..(no one should DARE to disapprove of him and his will; better to preemptively destroy a possible enemy)

Tellis has fallen on hard time and can no longer afford to host the party or pay his dues...as the debate continues about who may have damaged the Herms and brought bad luck on the city; he speaks up in defence of Alkibiades "No, Myron is right, it was planned to a hair and not be Aldkibiades"

Kritias answers him smoothly "No one, I am sure, will think worse of Tellis for supporting his host"

The men had been drinking, and were full of their affairs. But I, who was watching, saw Tellis' face stiffen, as at the first bite of a sword-thrust. When you have thought yourself among friends, who have given the best proof of their liking of your company, it strikes hard to be called a sycophant for the first time. I knew he would never sup with the club again. I went over to him, and filled his cup, knowing no other way to show how I felt; and he smiled at me, trying to greet me as he always did. Our eyes met above the wine-cup, like men's who have picked up the sound of a lost battle before the trumpet blows the retreat.

Yes, Kritias is certainly a priceless bastard of the highest order! (I don't mean that as a compliment!)  >:(
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 30, 2007, 11:19:08 pm
oops...one more thing from this chapter!!

Alexias now has a stepmother...

Myron married her when she was fifteen...making her only eight years older than Alexias. She was small and dark (Myron being fond it seemed of dark women) and the only child of a well respected Athenian who had given her a great deal of freedom. She was intelligent and interested in the world around her. Myron would rebuke her for her interest in politics but Alexias told her everything....they were very close and she gave him great comfort after the tyranny of the Rhodian!

Yes, and she's a sweetheart too. She's painted as a really warm, lovely person.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on January 30, 2007, 11:29:43 pm
Jess, before we move on to Chapter 4,  this quote form Chapter 3 has been troubling me.  I would be interested in your take on it:

“I thought I would pray before going, but did not know which altar to turn to; for the gods seemed everywhere, all saying the same word to me, as if they had been not twelve but one. I felt I had seen a mystery, yet knew not what. I was happy. Wishing to praise all gods alike, I stood where I was and lifted my hands to the sky.”

I see this as Renault effectively selling her soul to the devil. A cop-out. On the nose. Not kosher. It’s almost as though she’s hedging her bets and pandering to her predominantly Christian readership here. Alluding to the forthcoming, glorious (Humph, vandalising more like!) Christian era.  I am aware of the Dionysian Mysteries, but the word “mystery” used in this context, immediately on the heels of “not twelve but one (god)”, has a decidedly Christian odour attached to it for me.

Am I over-reacting? No-one would be happier than me if you tell me I’m misjudging Renault here, because I love her work, and only want to enjoy it and gain from it. Please tell me I’m wrong. I want you to tell me I’ve got this all wrong, Jess.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on February 02, 2007, 05:56:56 am
Jess, before we move on to Chapter 4,  this quote form Chapter 3 has been troubling me.  I would be interested in your take on it:

“I thought I would pray before going, but did not know which altar to turn to; for the gods seemed everywhere, all saying the same word to me, as if they had been not twelve but one. I felt I had seen a mystery, yet knew not what. I was happy. Wishing to praise all gods alike, I stood where I was and lifted my hands to the sky.”

I see this as Renault effectively selling her soul to the devil. A cop-out. On the nose. Not kosher. It’s almost as though she’s hedging her bets and pandering to her predominantly Christian readership here. Alluding to the forthcoming, glorious (Humph, vandalising more like!) Christian era.  I am aware of the Dionysian Mysteries, but the word “mystery” used in this context, immediately on the heels of “not twelve but one (god)”, has a decidedly Christian odour attached to it for me.

Am I over-reacting? No-one would be happier than me if you tell me I’m misjudging Renault here, because I love her work, and only want to enjoy it and gain from it. Please tell me I’m wrong. I want you to tell me I’ve got this all wrong, Jess.

No Kerry I think you are quite right here, I think MR uses a cop-out to head off any potential backlashes to her work as per my earlier references to an exclusively "gay" character as discussed in earlier postings.  Please don't get me wrong I love MR's work too but she did write for a particular adience at a particular time and I think she had to protect herself.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on February 02, 2007, 07:56:29 am
I thought when I read that in the context of the story...that she was trying to convey that feeling that you get when you are IN nature and feel full of something more than yourself...the feeling you get sometimes at night when you look at the stars. We don't have words for it so (for me) this is what Alexias would have thought of that feeling... he WOULD have seen it as having to do with the Gods but would have no experience to tell him which god or if in fact it came from the Gods. Remember he is still very young and innocent here..caught up in a moment of awe and wonder.

I think she was just trying to show his confusion...we view it as a foretelling of the Christian god but remember monotheism is not a new concept...the Egyptians have flirted with it themselves... 
 
(I don't see why she would have felt the need to 'cop out' in this book when she didn't in any of her other books...)
 
 
 
 
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on February 14, 2007, 03:40:45 am
I thought when I read that in the context of the story...that she was trying to convey that feeling that you get when you are IN nature and feel full of something more than yourself...the feeling you get sometimes at night when you look at the stars. We don't have words for it so (for me) this is what Alexias would have thought of that feeling...  he WOULD have seen it as having to do with the Gods but would have no experience to tell him which god or if in fact it came from the Gods. Remember he is still very young and innocent here..caught up in a moment of awe and wonder.

I think she was just trying to show his confusion...we view it as a foretelling of the Christian god but remember monotheism is not a new concept...the Egyptians have flirted with it themselves...   
 
(I don't see why she would have felt the need to 'cop out' in this book when she didn't in any of her other books...)
 

Perhaps I was being a little harsh with the "cop out" comment. Like Zander (and you, too, Jess), I love Renault's work. That one little quote just hit a raw nerve with me. I really appreciated the eloquence of your argument, Jess. You have a fine way with words. Have you ever been in a debating club? However, on this occasion, I must lean towards Zander's argument. Doesn't make me love Renault's work any less. That's never going to happen!  :D
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on February 27, 2007, 06:59:17 am
OK so where is everyone up to?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on February 27, 2007, 07:32:47 am
OK so where is everyone up to?

I'd love to get back to TLOTW, Zander. It's still sitting here on my desk, exactly where I left it some weeks ago. I've not had the impetus to progress further. I would be happy to recommence our Athenian adventure. Are you and Jess interested?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on February 27, 2007, 07:35:24 am
I'd love to get back to TLOTW, Zander. It's still sitting here on my desk, exactly where I left it some weeks ago. I've not had the impetus to progress further. I would be happy to recommence our Athenian adventure. Are you and Jess interested?
I am but from the standpoint that it's abook I've read and I'm commenting from memory, I suppose we should ask where everyone is with this.  I'm always happy to participate  ;)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on February 27, 2007, 08:30:45 am
I'd love to get back to TLOTW, Zander. It's still sitting here on my desk, exactly where I left it some weeks ago. I've not had the impetus to progress further. I would be happy to recommence our Athenian adventure. Are you and Jess interested?

humph! He abandons us to run buck wild on the mountainside....and now he is ready to come back???

OK!!

 :laugh: :laugh:

we were on Chapter 3...everyone ready to move to Chapter 4?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on February 27, 2007, 08:35:59 am
humph! He abandons us to run buck wild on the mountainside....and now he is ready to come back???

OK!!

 :laugh: :laugh:

we were on Chapter 3...everyone ready to move to Chapter 4?
Errrrr... couldn't we discuss buck wild on a mountainside - sounds lottsa fun  ;D
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on February 27, 2007, 08:45:27 am
Errrrr... couldn't we discuss buck wild on a mountainside - sounds lottsa fun  ;D

LOL!! that was 'paraphrasing' a later comment from our book...but describes what he has been doing here on Bettermost!!  :P

Have you been looking at his past posts?? Cause he has some 'splaining to do!!  >:(

can't just drop comments and run off thinking we country folk know what he is talking about! "dressed head to toe in leather with a colourcoded bandanna in the back pocket" HUH?? Bandannas only come in TWO colors..red and blue....and you pick out which one based on what color you are wearing! and black goes with everything! Silly Kerry!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Zander on February 27, 2007, 10:02:20 am
I'll be blue  ;D
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on February 27, 2007, 06:58:58 pm
LOL!! that was 'paraphrasing' a later comment from our book...but describes what he has been doing here on Bettermost!!  :P

Have you been looking at his past posts?? Cause he has some 'splaining to do!!  >:(

can't just drop comments and run off thinking we country folk know what he is talking about! "dressed head to toe in leather with a colourcoded bandanna in the back pocket" HUH?? Bandannas only come in TWO colors..red and blue....and you pick out which one based on what color you are wearing! and black goes with everything! Silly Kerry!

OK! OK! I confess! Lock me up and throw away the key! I'm guilty!   :'(  ;)  :laugh:

Yes, that was me running buck wild on the mountainside!  :o

God, how I wish that was true. Fact is, in reality, I've become a pathetic excuse for a human being - an addict! Sob! David has turned me into an addict! Yes, David! He introduced me to those blog quiz thingies over at the Polling Place, where he is now Moderator. Seems that they are the only things I do here at BetterMost these days! I'm hooked!

Given a choice between running buck wild on a mountainside and completing yet another of those addictive quizzes, I'd prefer to take the former option any day! Especially if I get to run wild with Ennis! Yee-Haw!   :P  :-*  :laugh:

Bandannas come in a huge range of colours, Jess, not just red and blue. The 70s were sooooooo long ago, but I seem to recall that my bandanna was neither blue nor red. And no, I will not be drawn on any more details than that!!! (giggle/blush)  :-X

Would be happy to get stuck into TLOTW again. I'm at work just now and don't have my copy with me, but will comment on Chapter 4 as soon as I have an opportunity.

It's great to return to my cultured roots, where I belong, after all that ill-spent time romping on the hillside. Tell me, why am I getting Julie Andrews flashbacks here?!   ::)  :laugh:

P.S., Good to see you spelling "colour" the right way, Jess!  :D

Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on March 02, 2007, 01:28:08 am
Chapter 4

Casting a spell that would put the powers of the most beguiling enchantress to shame, Mary Renault conjures this dazzling picture of the ancient port of Piraeus, at its most magnificent. Athens, at the height of its glory.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Olympia.jpg)
Recreated trireme, The Olympia,
docked in Piraeus

Xenophon and I, to escape all this gloom in the City, spent our spare time in Piraeus. Here there was always something new; a rich metic from Phrygia or Egypt might be building himself a house in the style of his former city, or putting up a shrine to one of the gods whom one hardly knew in his foreign dress, with even a dog’s head perhaps or a fish’s tail; or there would be a new shipment in the Emporion of carpets from Babylon, Persian lapis, Scythian turquoises, or tin and amber from the wild Hyperborean places that only Phoenicians know.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Anubis.jpg)
The Egyptian God, Anubis

Our silver owls were the only coinage, then, that was good all over the world. You saw in the wide streets Nubians with plugs of ivory pulling their ears down to their shoulders; long-haired Medes, in trousers and sequin bonnets; Egyptians with painted eyes, wearing only skirts of stiff linen and collars of gems and beads. The air was heavy with the smell of foreign bodies, of spices and hemp and pitch; strange tongues chattered like beast speaking to bird; one guessed at the meaning, and watched the talking hands.

A magical place, indeed.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on March 02, 2007, 01:44:53 am
Chapter 4

Casting a spell that would put the powers of the most beguiling enchantress to shame, Mary Renault conjures this dazzling picture of the ancient port of Piraeus, at its most magnificent. Athens, at the height of its glory.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Olympia.jpg)
Recreated trireme, The Olympia,
docked in Piraeus

Xenophon and I, to escape all this gloom in the City, spent our spare time in Piraeus. Here there was always something new; a rich metic from Phrygia or Egypt might be building himself a house in the style of his former city, or putting up a shrine to one of the gods whom one hardly knew in his foreign dress, with even a dog’s head perhaps or a fish’s tail; or there would be a new shipment in the Emporion of carpets from Babylon, Persian lapis, Scythian turquoises, or tin and amber from the wild Hyperborean places that only Phoenicians know.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/Anubis.jpg)
The Egyptian God, Anubis

Our silver owls were the only coinage, then, that was good all over the world. You saw in the wide streets Nubians with plugs of ivory pulling their ears down to their shoulders; long-haired Medes, in trousers and sequin bonnets; Egyptians with painted eyes, wearing only skirts of stiff linen and collars of gems and beads. The air was heavy with the smell of foreign bodies, of spices and hemp and pitch; strange tongues chattered like beast speaking to bird; one guessed at the meaning, and watched the talking hands.

A magical place, indeed.


this is interesting to me, Kerry. Alexias doesn't see these gods as opposing gods...enemies of his own but rather the same gods wearing other forms.

would make for a much more tolerant society if we could all do that.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on March 02, 2007, 09:19:31 am
this is interesting to me, Kerry. Alexias doesn't see these gods as opposing gods...enemies of his own but rather the same gods wearing other forms.

would make for a much more tolerant society if we could all do that.

Many ancient civilisations were tolerant and respectful of the customs and culture of others. For example, there were temples dedicated to the Egyptian Goddess, Isis, in Rome. Very enlightened.

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/isis.gif)
Isis
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on March 05, 2007, 12:39:43 am

(http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/kez4oz/ManYouthatSymposium.jpg)
Man & Youth at Symposium

“Unrequited love’s a drag,” as Mama Cass once said.  And nearly all of us have experience the excruciating pain, at some time in our lives, of being deeply in love with someone who didn’t even know of our existence. Speaking for myself, I vividly remember the crush I had on my high school physical education teacher. Adolescent love is more like a blight than a delight. It can lay you low. Make you sick. Drive you to distraction. One becomes morbidly preoccupied with the object of your desire. At the age of 16, Mr D was my singular raison d’etre! And then, one day, he came up to me in the school yard, and spoke to me. He asked me some inane question about my father, I recall. And though I loved him with a passion that was fast threatening to annihilate me, I found that the only way I could respond to this beautiful, god-like man; this vision splendid; was by stuttering out a mumbled response, giggling, and turning such a bright shade of fire engine red, I thought my head would surely burst into flames at any moment. Ah, adolescence! More to be endured, than enjoyed!

Unlike my Mr D, it looks like the object of Alexias’ ardour, Lysis, is beginning to pay attention and take notice. Even though Lysis was engaged in conversation with his peers about the whereabouts of Sokrates, it would appear that his attention was surreptitiously drawn elsewhere. Lysis had made a point of noticing that Alexias had twisted his ankle. Not unusual in itself. However, Lysis leaves his companions and takes a cooling cloth to Alexias, to bind his foot. Move over Florence Nightingale, Lysis is here to save the day!

Alexias tells us that he blushes so violently because he is ashamed that Lysis will find out that he hasn’t really been injured, or that he is malingering, or that he’s withdrawn from the race because he fears defeat. But I wonder if the real reason he has this reaction is because he has been surprised by the sudden, unexpected presence of the man he has been secretly fantasizing about and lusting over. 

It reminds me of the Kahlil Gibran quote about the peasant who performs an act of bravery and is brought before the king to be honoured for his heroism. Even though he is thrilled to have his bravery acknowledged by the king, he is more mindful that he is trembling violently at being in the presence of his sovereign.

Here we have a man whom Alexias has been admiring from afar for some time. And now, suddenly, here he is, literally casting his shadow over Alexias’ person, soothing balm in hand, eager to administer comforting relief.

Psst, Alexias, he doesn’t find you boorish in the least. He’s got your name on his dance card, baby! He thinks you’re cute! Looks like the love you’re experiencing ain’t so unrequited after all!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on March 05, 2007, 08:47:53 am
well Alexias IS faking...he wanted to eavesdrop on Socrates friends' conversation!! and think if YOU were nude on the ground and the object of your admiration offered to touch you!! Knowing teenaged boys I imagine there was a reason all those men liked to come watch them exercise!!  ::)

Here is Alexias's reaction:

I thanked him stammerinly, being taken by surprise, and overwhelmed that such a person should talk to me. Seeing I had a long way to look up, he came down on one knee; I saw he had a wet cloth in his hand, which he must have gotten from the bath. He paused for a moment and then said "Shall I do it?"

At this I remembered that nothing was wrong with me. I was so ashamed at the thought of his finding it out, and thinking I had sat down out of weakness or the fear of being outrun, that I felt my face and my whole body grow burning hot, and sat unable to answer anything. I thought he would be digusted by my boorishness; but holding out the cloth he said gently "If you would rather, then, do it yourself"

I like Lysis reaction to Alexias's shyness...SUCH a gentleman....*sigh*

but can you see HIS shyness? better hid than Alexias...
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on March 05, 2007, 09:18:11 am
Gasp! Yes, of course, Alexias would have been naked!  ::)

Embarrassing for him? Well, no, not really. He would have been viewed quite quizzically if he'd been running around that track with his clothes on!   :laugh:

Ya gotta luv thum thar zany Greeks! Yee-haw!  :-*  ;)  8)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on March 05, 2007, 09:52:14 am
Gasp! Yes, of course, Alexias would have been naked!  ::)

Embarrassing for him? Well, no, not really. He would have been viewed quite quizzically if he'd been running around that track with his clothes on!   :laugh:

Ya gotta luv thum thar zany Greeks! Yee-haw!  :-*  ;)  8)

uh Kerry...I was takling about the natural physiological response a teenager would have when presented unexpectedly with the object of he admiration leaning over him and offering to touch him (even just the ankle!)

do I HAVE to spell it out??

I can see poor Alexias being very embarrassed....I am so fond of him!! very real to me...makes me want to mother his sweet self!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on March 09, 2007, 08:16:25 pm
This is OT...BUT...have any of you seen the movie "300". I saw it today and WOW !!!! :) I want to see it again if my ears can stand the VERRY LOUD sound  :)
I remember Kirk Douglas in SPARTACUS  :)
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on March 09, 2007, 08:20:55 pm
Spartacus!!

I was like forty before I realized what man was talking about when he said "some men like fish...and some like beef. There is nothing wrong with it...just a matter of taste...now I like beef myself..."
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Artiste on March 20, 2007, 06:29:42 pm
Kirk Douglass was on TV this morning, this March 20th 2007... 90 yrs plus?

He mentioned his real name!

And  talked about his book which is out now!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on March 20, 2007, 06:50:42 pm
I haven't seen HIM in a long time! I am glad he is still doing well!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: TXdoug on March 20, 2007, 07:02:54 pm
I missed seeing Kirk on the Regis and Kelly show . I have seen him several times and highly respect him.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Artiste on March 20, 2007, 09:14:59 pm
Kirk Douglas had a stroke and talks now slowly. Guessed he had to relearn how to talk. He joked that he could NOT talk afterwards and, therefore, wished that black and white movies were back (so he could do one without talking!)!

He mentioned that his dog has his real name he had as a child (before having an actor's name), as he had a jewish one!! Russian jewish family, if I remember, but I do not know if he is born in the USA!

And he re-married his wife, same lady for over 50 or 60 or more (?) years!!

He sure makes good jokes too!! I have forgotten if I ever saw his house in Los Angeles! Does he live in Hollywood?

The film 300 is like Spartacus?
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: opinionista on March 21, 2007, 07:59:23 am
I think Kirk Douglas is from New York. Not the city though.
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Artiste on March 21, 2007, 10:58:18 am
Thanks opinionista!

It was on TV this morning March 21st 2007, that Kirk Douglas is 90 years old!

He had said so himself yesterday too, on TV!

So you think he lives near New York City?

Hugs!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on March 31, 2009, 11:25:44 pm
"Justice? If the gods give a man wisdom, or forethought, or skill must he be brought down as if he had got them by theft? We shall be laming the best athletes soon, at the demand of the worst, in the name of justice. Or some citizen with pockmarks and a squint will lay a complaint against such a boy as this" (here he pointed suddenly at me) "and his nose will be broken I suppose, for justice's sake."

"The Last of the Wine"
Mary Renault
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on April 01, 2009, 12:36:42 am
"Men are not born equal in themselves," he saidto me after, "so I think it beneath a man to postulate that they are. If I thought myself as good as Sokrates I should be a fool; and if, not really believing it, I asked you to make me happy by assuring me of it, you would rightly despise me. So why should I insult my fellow citizens by treating them as fools and cowards? A man that thinks himself as good as everyone else will be at no pains to grow better. On the other hand, I might think myself as good as Sokrates, and even persuade other fools to agree with me; but under a democracy, Sokrates is there in the Agora to prove me wrong. I want a City where I can find my equals and respect my betters, whoever they are; and where no one can tell me to swallow a lie because it is expedient, or some other man's will."

"The Last of the Wine"

Mary Renault
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on April 01, 2009, 01:01:33 am
I could see him waiting for me to cease, to say what he had ready to say, exactly as if I had not spoken. I had felt easy with him, liking the way he treated every man as an equal; but it is strange to speak with someone one's thoughts do not reach. Of a sudden it was as if a great desert surrounded me; I even felt the fear of Pan, driver of the herds, as one does in lonely places.

"The Last of the Wine"
Mary Renault
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on April 01, 2009, 03:06:41 am
"Justice? If the gods give a man wisdom, or forethought, or skill must he be brought down as if he had got them by theft? We shall be laming the best athletes soon, at the demand of the worst, in the name of justice. Or some citizen with pockmarks and a squint will lay a complaint against such a boy as this" (here he pointed suddenly at me) "and his nose will be broken I suppose, for justice's sake."

"The Last of the Wine"
Mary Renault

Gasp! The perils of political correctness. Very forward thinking, our Mary (in an ancient Greek kinda way)!  ;)   :D
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: Kerry on April 01, 2009, 03:08:32 am
"Men are not born equal in themselves," he saidto me after, "so I think it beneath a man to postulate that they are. If I thought myself as good as Sokrates I should be a fool; and if, not really believing it, I asked you to make me happy by assuring me of it, you would rightly despise me. So why should I insult my fellow citizens by treating them as fools and cowards? A man that thinks himself as good as everyone else will be at no pains to grow better. On the other hand, I might think myself as good as Sokrates, and even persuade other fools to agree with me; but under a democracy, Sokrates is there in the Agora to prove me wrong. I want a City where I can find my equals and respect my betters, whoever they are; and where no one can tell me to swallow a lie because it is expedient, or some other man's will."

"The Last of the Wine"

Mary Renault

There be wisdom here!
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on April 01, 2009, 07:22:38 am
Gasp! The perils of political correctness. Very forward thinking, our Mary (in an ancient Greek kinda way)!  ;)   :D

indeed! this book (to me) speaks so much to where we are right now here in the US. I love the blurb on the cover:

"Alexias, a young Athenian of good family, reaches manhood during the last phases of the Peloponnesian War, a time not unlike our own, when people born to a heritage of security and power felt the structure of their lives being undermined by forces they but dimly understood."

and as you know, things did NOT turn out well for them. :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on April 04, 2009, 01:05:20 am
the beautiful young Alexias has attracted a suitor that is persistant and rude....he discusses this man with Sokrates:

"He tried first to buy me with gifts; not flowers or a hare, but the kind of thing we can't afford at home. Then he sent word that he was dying, to make me take him out of pity; and now, what is surely as low as a man can go, he is willing I should do it simply to keep him quiet. If I were to lose my father and mother and all I have, if I were disgraced even before the City so that people turned from me in the street, he would be glad of it, if it put me within his reach. And this he calls love." I had spoken too vehemently, but Sokrates still looked at me kindly; so coming at last to what had been behind the rest, I said, "I shall always think worse of myself for having been his choice."

He shook his head, "You are wrong, my boy, if you think he is seeking a kindred spirit. He is looking for what he lacks, being limp of soul, and not wishing to know that the good must first be wrought with toil out of a man's own self, like the statue from the block."
Title: Re: Mary Renault Book Discussion
Post by: injest on April 04, 2009, 01:21:47 am
Phaedon speaking of Kritias:

"When a man is freed from the bonds of dogma and custom, where will he run? to what he hates, or what he loves? (snip) For a long time now I have watched Kritias getting loose, from the soul, if you like the word,or from whatever keeps a man on two legs instead of four. I have gone step by step with him, for his reasons are a mirror held up to mine, till I stood at the very edge of his conclusions. It is the true teacher's gift, they say, to discover a man to himself....At Gorgus's once I lay awake considering how to kill him. But already it was too late."