Forgive me for being dense but I don,t understand what you mean in these two quotes? Why would he be criticized for saying something after Heath died? If anything it would be welcomed. No one else in the entertainment business who said anything was criticized for it, so I,m sorry I,m not sure I understand what you mean. Also the part about being with his friend on his last journey, ie his funeral, well why not? People go to their friends funerals all the time to pay their last respects, so why not Jake? Again forgive me if I,m being dense, and I mean no disrespect but I honestly don,t get your point.
Sorry,who was dense it's me,because I don't control English well enough as to make me understand...
I meant by being criticised if
he demonstrated too grief that,obviously,he isn't like the other actors who had worked with Heath.Some paps have wanted to create a kind of BBM off screen between them-or at least,this is what I understand...-,the same than there have been some speculations about his private life and sexual orientation; so,some questions perhaps would have been too indiscreet for him,more than to the other persons.That's what I meant by "being criticised",or better said,he would have been-and as a matter of fact,he has been...-more in the public gossip eye-I don't know if you said it so...,sorry again
-.
The other question,being with his friend in his funeral,that's is: why not? Why hasn't he been? At least,he hadn't been seen in Perth,had he?That's what I asked for,I didn't find strange that he went,but that he didn't go then nor in any public or private-as it seems-ceremonies for Heath's memory.Have I explained myself well enough this time?.