I finished it yesterday, but am looking forward to talking about it with you all. How should we do it, what kid of structure?
Maybe in parts? Limit the discussion to the first third at the beginning, then the second, then the last third? And safe overall comments and perceptions for later, when everybody has read the whole book?
This structure would have two advantages in my opinion: First, the slower readers wouldn't read spoilers. Second, discussion might be more detailed. At the end of the book, you might already have forgotten something you originally wanted to say about chapter three for example.
The book isn't very thick, so I think three parts (plus closing comments about the book as a whole) are enough. If we divide it into more parts, it might get too ramified.
What do others think?