Author Topic: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?  (Read 11501 times)

Offline YaadPyar

  • BetterMost 1000+ Posts Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,668
Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« on: June 09, 2006, 08:53:54 am »
The thoroughly modern moustache?
by Catherine Hours
Thu Jun 8, 1:26 PM ET



"I think it's sexy," Donald Bradford, 26, says of the bushy growth that has adorned his upper lip for the past two months.

Largely shunned since the 1980s, moustaches are enjoying something of a renaissance among young New Yorkers, following a comeback trail blazed by such hip role models as actor Nicholas Cage and the ultra-trendy fashion photographer Terry Richardson.

"It's just cool, right?, and it's fun," said Bradford, a tall man with blonde highlights in his hair to match his silver jacket.

Jay Della Vale verges on the evangelical in his praise of the moustache's attributes which, according to the 26-year-old DJ, include intimations of virility, a relaxed style and a healthy sense of humor.

"You walk differently. You're more laid back. You dress differently," Della Vale said. "We're on a mission to bring it back."

Della Vale's devotion to facial hair prompted him to make a documentary "The Glorious Moustache Challenge" in which he persuaded 30 men to grow moustaches for a month to see what difference it made in their lives and the reactions of those around them.

"For the first month, everybody is against it, especially the women," he said. "They say, 'Please don't do that, you remind me of my father ... or a 70s porn star'."

According to Della Vale, most of his moustachioed guinea pigs weathered the early critical storm and actually became quite fond of their new accessory.

Love of "the stache" was taken for granted at the recent New York City Beard and Moustache Championships, which saw hundreds of hirsute aficionados turn out to root for their favourite styles.

Iconic images of movie stars and characters who championed the moustache -- Clark Gable, Sean Connery, Inspector Clouseau, Marlon Brando in "The Godfather" -- were projected onto a giant screen to appreciative applause.

But the real adulation was reserved for a photo of the contestants' main hero, Tom Selleck, who brought stache-style to the masses in the early 1980s with the television cop series "Magnum."

But not long after those heady days, the moustache's fortunes took a dive in the popularity stakes -- it's fall from grace best summed up by the makeover forced on the "Brawny Man."

A brand icon whose lumberjack shirt and heavy moustache had promoted Brawny kitchen towels for decades, the Brawny Man was replaced in 2003 by a clean-shaven hunk who was seen as more in tune with the times.

For all the efforts of Della Vale and his cohorts, bringing back the old style is proving a tough sell to the average man in the street.

"I feel less confident, more insecure," said Graham Veysey, 24, who grew his moustache and entered the New York contest in a response to a dare from his friends.

"It's just not me," Veysey said. "I didn't understand how much it would dominate the conversation. It's like 25 times a day!"

New York-based French fashion designer Thomas Vasseur finds his moustache -- complemented with prominent sideburns -- serves as an open invitation to comment from just about everybody.

"For some of my friends, it suggests I'm looking for a new identity," said Vasseur, 32.

"My mother tells me I remind her of my father who she divorced 25 years ago, my nephews tell me it scratches, and then there are also those, happily, who say that it suits me," he added.

No matter what the reaction, Vasseur insists he has no intention of taking a razor to his upper lip.

"It's a male accessory, just like highlights or make-up for women," said Vasseur. "I would feel naked without it."

As for the future, zealots like Della Vale optimistically predict an "epidemic" of moustaches spreading across the country, while other fashion arbiters are more cautious.

"It's almost like a tongue-in-cheek kind of style," said James Bassil, editor-in-chief of the male lifestyle website, AskMen.com.

"The general impression that women have of moustaches is either they love them or they are absolutely repulsed by them, and there's no real middle ground," Bassil said.

"And there needs to be a middle ground for a fashion or a facial hair trend to be adopted en masse permanently," he added.



Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AFP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Agence France Presse.

"Vice, Virtue. It's best not to be too moral. You cheat yourself out of too much life. Aim above morality. If you apply that to life, then you're bound to live life fully." (Harold & Maude - 1971)

Offline SFEnnisSF

  • BBM Radio Program Director
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • BetterMost 1000+ Posts Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,548
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2006, 10:55:03 am »
I never used to like moustaches, but suddenly after BBM, I'm finding myself noticing them more.....  ;D

Offline YaadPyar

  • BetterMost 1000+ Posts Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,668
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2006, 08:04:00 pm »
Seems the moustache has just been co-opted by the whole beard-moustache combo.  They're still there, but kinda incognito as part of the whole facial hair package.

It so depends on the man and the moustache.  I've never been a fan of them on women... ;D
"Vice, Virtue. It's best not to be too moral. You cheat yourself out of too much life. Aim above morality. If you apply that to life, then you're bound to live life fully." (Harold & Maude - 1971)

Offline Brown Eyes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,377
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2006, 12:24:01 am »
I've always wondered about something regarding Jack's moustache and BBM.  It seems very pointed that we don't get to see Ennis and Jack kiss once the moustache appears.  I wonder if middle America wouldn't be able to handle seeing a man kiss another man with a moustache.  This is a wierd question, I know.  But, it sort of bothers me.  I wish that there had been at least one kiss with the moustache.
 :-\
« Last Edit: June 10, 2006, 12:31:31 am by atz75 »
the world was asleep to our latent fuss - bowie

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2006, 09:54:21 am »
I wonder if middle America wouldn't be able to handle seeing a man kiss another man with a moustache.  This is a wierd question, I know.  But, it sort of bothers me.  I wish that there had been at least one kiss with the moustache.
 :-\

This made me laugh a little; I picture viewers who managed to get through the first tent scene become so incensed by a moustache-kissing scene -- "That does it!" -- they would storm out of the theater. But it's an interesting question. You could be right that a moustache would make a difference -- it's a little extra reminder of masculinity. More in your face, so to speak. It's hard to say, since they don't kiss, period, after the reunion scene. If the moustache were the only thing keeping them from kissing, you'd think Ang could have just had Jake shave it (or not glue it on). ;D

Another thing that occurs to me, now that you mention this, is that age might have been an issue. Viewers who have a hard time with the love scenes probably can, even if they're homophobic, find them slightly more tolerable when the participants are young and beautiful than when the participants are aging (and, well, still plenty beautiful, but theoretically less so). Older gay sex, after all, violates two taboos.


Offline Front-Ranger

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 30,328
  • Brokeback got us good.
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2006, 10:14:43 am »
Older sex is a taboo?? Latjoreme, here's my response:  :o :-X :-\ ??? >:( :-\ :P :)
Get thee a copy of Gail Parent's Sex and the Seasoned Woman posthaste!! Where did U go Mrs. Robinson, latjoreme needs a talking-to from U!! (You guys will have to provide your own backtalk on this one.)
"chewing gum and duct tape"

Offline David

  • BetterMost 5000+ Posts Club
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,097
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2006, 11:05:16 am »
Ha ha ha!    I know what you meant.   

Very true though.    The public likes to see the "Pretty People" in their movies and love scenes.    Let's face it,  the actors were not anything like the descriptions in the original story.   

It is a cold reality in the work force too.  Companies like to hire an attractive receptionist and sales reps.    If you were born with exceptional good looks, you go alot farther in life that us who don't.   :-\

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2006, 11:06:30 am »
Whoa!!! Hold on there, cowgirl, I mean in movies only!  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Don't worry, as someone almost 10 years older than Jack and Ennis were at the END of the movie, I am definitely not talking about real life!!!!

Of course, there are exceptions in movies, too, Mrs. Robinson being one. Harold and Maude. That one with Meryl Streep and Robert DeNiro. Diane Keaton and Jack Nicholson (Something's Gotta Give), Shirley McLaine and Jack Nicholson (Terms of Endearment; though did they actually have sex? Can't remember now). For that matter, almost any movie with Jack Nicholson!

Actually, sex involving older men is no big deal in movies. It's sex involving older women that's pretty close to an absolute taboo. Those examples above are exceptions that prove the rule.

And of course BBM does not involve older women at all. But it's a special case. I thought the taboo might apply here because they're both older (though far from old), and it seems as if movies usually require that at least one member of the couple be under 35.

Also, I was thinking about the Salon review of BBM. No time to look it up now, but it was something like, "the scenes on Brokeback are engaging because young love is almost always pretty" or something to that effect. I don't think that critic is homophobic or even ageist (though I do question her pan of Brokeback). But it suggested to me that there's something in human nature that would prefer to watch younger people have sex.

David, your post came in while I was writing this. Yes, that's what I'm talking about.

Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,186
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2006, 12:07:09 pm »
But it suggested to me that there's something in human nature that would prefer to watch younger people have sex.

Maybe because younger people are more likely to be in good physical condition, no wrinkles, no gray hairs, unlike us more, ahem, mature types?

Hey, I'm guilty of this myself. And the entire, er, adult entertainment industry is built on this. If I want to watch a middle-aged, bald/gray-haired guy with gray chest hair and a waistline only a little smaller than his chest, I'll stand in front of a mirror and ... oh, never mind!  ::)
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.

Offline Brown Eyes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,377
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2006, 06:13:24 pm »
it's a little extra reminder of masculinity. More in your face, so to speak. It's hard to say, since they don't kiss, period, after the reunion scene.

This is exactly what I meant.  The moustache (whether people find it attractive or not when it comes to a love scene on film) is definitely an extra marker of "masculinity."  At least we do see them embrace in the tent and at the end of the argument... but a full on kiss would look very different from the early tent scenes and reunion.  It's interesting too that Jack has that moustache for the bulk of their relationship, it seems, or at least half of it.  I think this says a lot about Ennis and his sexuality too.  I'm sure Jack would have shaved it off if he realized that Ennis didn't like it... But, I think the moustache, and Ennis's implicit approval of it, demonstrate just how much Ennis must like kissing men (since it's obviously one big and unmistakeable difference in kissing a man vs. a woman). 

I still feel like this might be an odd topic, but I do think there's something interesting  here...
 :-\
the world was asleep to our latent fuss - bowie

Offline newyearsday

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 788
  • ponygirl
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2006, 02:18:58 pm »
I agree with you Amanda--it's a good topic, with some very neat detours along the way about ageism in the movies, and in life. At least we know that in the story, they were getting down to bidness right up till the end. I so wish they had showed that at the last scene of them sitting and talking by the river at night.

This is my first time over here to the open forum, and I'm liking what I see. Nice to know that 6 months later, there are STILL things to be talking about in the movie that haven't been discussed before.

Revelationtees--wear them for good. Profits go to the Matthew Shepard Foundation: www.revelationtees.spreadshirt.com & www.revelationtees.spreadshirt.net (for EU)
"One life, with each other..."

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2006, 04:36:54 pm »
Welcome, Jenny! Glad to have you join us here.

I think they do kind of imply that in the last scene -- that quick shot of them together in the tent -- and I am glad that shot made it into the movie. Still, I wish it had been a little more, um, intense.

Offline newyearsday

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 788
  • ponygirl
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2006, 05:44:36 pm »
Yeah, for me, it was a nice shot, and is some people's favorite frame in the movie, but a very different portrayal of their relationship than the book showed at that particular point.
Revelationtees--wear them for good. Profits go to the Matthew Shepard Foundation: www.revelationtees.spreadshirt.com & www.revelationtees.spreadshirt.net (for EU)
"One life, with each other..."

Offline Brown Eyes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,377
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2006, 06:08:29 pm »
Yeah, for me, it was a nice shot, and is some people's favorite frame in the movie, but a very different portrayal of their relationship than the book showed at that particular point.

I'm guessing that Lee is letting the audience imagine and assume that their relationship continued to be physical.  Some of the glimpses of their later camping trips are so brief that we hardly have time to get our bearings or to see much real interaction between Jack and Ennis at all.  I do think this is a minor flaw with the movie.  I would prefer to have seen more of the later conversations (not to mention love scenes) between Jack and Ennis, and I mean conversations that weren't filled with tension and arguments.  I feel like we often find ourselves learning more about the Lureen/Alma/Cassie/Randall characters and their involvement in our boys' lives than we learn about how the main relationship actually developed.  I'm guessing that Lee is trying to make the audience actually feel the same kind of frustration that Jack feels when he says "never enough time, never enough".  I mean I know I'm frustrated by the lack of time the camera spends on the two of them together in the second half of the film.
 :-\
the world was asleep to our latent fuss - bowie

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2006, 11:44:05 pm »
I do think this is a minor flaw with the movie.  I would prefer to have seen more of the later conversations (not to mention love scenes) between Jack and Ennis, and I mean conversations that weren't filled with tension and arguments.  I feel like we often find ourselves learning more about the Lureen/Alma/Cassie/Randall characters and their involvement in our boys' lives than we learn about how the main relationship actually developed.  I'm guessing that Lee is trying to make the audience actually feel the same kind of frustration that Jack feels when he says "never enough time, never enough".  I mean I know I'm frustrated by the lack of time the camera spends on the two of them together in the second half of the film.

Me too. And though I understand Ang Lee's objective, I sometimes think he may have gone a bit TOO far. Just because something's a masterpiece doesn't mean it's perfect. Surely there could be some happy medium -- a teeny glimpse, at least, of the brilliant charge of their infrequent couplings.


Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2006, 12:28:58 am »
Ha ha ha!    I know what you meant.   

Very true though.    The public likes to see the "Pretty People" in their movies and love scenes.    Let's face it,  the actors were not anything like the descriptions in the original story.  

It is a cold reality in the work force too.  Companies like to hire an attractive receptionist and sales reps.    If you were born with exceptional good looks, you go alot farther in life that us who don't.   :-\

Yes. Didn't the author describe Ennis as a "buck tooth youth" or something like that? That is a far cry from Heath Ledger! Still, I sure was happy to see Heath up there on the screen. :)
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline Brown Eyes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,377
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2006, 07:35:31 pm »
Hi David,
Proulx describes her version of Jack as having an overbite.  Jack is made significantly more glamourous in the movie.
 :D
« Last Edit: June 21, 2006, 07:43:14 pm by atz75 »
the world was asleep to our latent fuss - bowie

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2006, 07:41:18 pm »
Great minds, Amanda! I just two minutes ago finished a post on this very subject in the "Randall really is" thread!  :D

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2006, 08:49:42 pm »
Hi David,
Proulx describes her version of Jack as having an overbite.  Jack is made significantly more glamourous in the movie.
 :D

Amanda. Ah! Thank you. Yes, Jake Gyllenhaal is a far cry from Annie Proulx's description of Jack. :)
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline Rayn

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
  • I'm also on FaceBook under Rayn Roberts
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #19 on: June 23, 2006, 02:23:39 am »
Amanda. Ah! Thank you. Yes, Jake Gyllenhaal is a far cry from Annie Proulx's description of Jack. :)


Annie said she thought Jake was "too pretty" for the part. If you've read the book, you know he is,
but I don't mind that at all!   ;)

Rayn

Offline Rayn

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
  • I'm also on FaceBook under Rayn Roberts
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #20 on: June 23, 2006, 02:30:11 am »
Gettin' back to the topic of "staches"...   Since the movie, I grew one, a long "Poncho Villa stache" and someone actually said I look like a cowboy now... 

HMMMMMMMMMMMM... Now why don't I wonder why!  Hollywood!     
But I've noted a lot of men wearing face hair lately.  I think it's a trend right now.

Rayn

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #21 on: June 23, 2006, 02:31:23 am »

Annie said she thought Jake was "too pretty" for the part. If you've read the book, you know he is,
but I don't mind that at all!   ;)

Rayn

Rayn.. I agree! I don't mind either. But if Hollywood HAD picked someone more exact to Annie Proulx character... I wonder who on earth they would have picked?

I wonder.... :o
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #22 on: June 23, 2006, 02:53:15 am »
How about ...



Tim Blake Nelson ("Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?"). He's how I kind of picture Story Jack. Still trying to think of a Story Ennis, though. Any ideas?

Like you, Rayn and David, I have no complaints about the casting choices they made.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2006, 03:01:25 am by latjoreme »

Offline Rayn

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
  • I'm also on FaceBook under Rayn Roberts
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2006, 01:17:49 pm »
if Hollywood HAD picked someone more exact to Annie Proulx character... I wonder who on earth they would have picked?  I wonder.... :o

I don' know...   I mean, in the book, Jack is kinda homely, buck teeth and all.  It's not until later, when he comes into money through marriage, that he changes his looks to something "better".   The interesting thing is, after Jack's death, when Ennis dreams of him, he dreams of how he was when they first met, not the "improved Jack", but Jack just as he was naturally.  That's sweet. 

Hollywood doesn't do homely too well, does it?

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2006, 11:51:28 pm »
I don' know...   I mean, in the book, Jack is kinda homely, buck teeth and all.  It's not until later, when he comes into money through marriage, that he changes his looks to something "better".   The interesting thing is, after Jack's death, when Ennis dreams of him, he dreams of how he was when they first met, not the "improved Jack", but Jack just as he was naturally.  That's sweet. 

Hollywood doesn't do homely too well, does it?

I agree with  you Rayn. They really don't unless it is absolutely neccessary to the story line I suppose. I alway thought Sissy Spacek look really cute in "Coalminer's Daughter". But, this homely look was vital to the storyline. But just like somebody pointed out earlier,  Jake sure did look good playing Jack. :)
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline dly64

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #25 on: June 27, 2006, 11:34:15 am »
I think they do kind of imply that in the last scene -- that quick shot of them together in the tent -- and I am glad that shot made it into the movie. Still, I wish it had been a little more, um, intense.

OMG! I so agree with you, latjoreme. I think we had agreed on this before. I only wish I would have seen more .... sigh.

As for that moustache .... I remember the 70's a bit too well. You know, the whole Burt Reynolds thing with the moustache and the hairy chest? I was in jr. high school when "Smokey and the Bandit" came out and I thought he was totally hot. Have times changed! I am not crazy about too much facial hair (or chest hair, for that matter) ... it's too painful and kind of ticklish at the same time. It's difficult to kiss. Of course ... I don't know what it would be like for a man to kiss a man with all that hair. Can any of you enlighten me?  ::)
Diane

"We're supposed to guard the sheep, not eat 'em."

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #26 on: June 27, 2006, 11:46:12 pm »
OMG! I so agree with you, latjoreme. I think we had agreed on this before. I only wish I would have seen more .... sigh.

As for that moustache .... I remember the 70's a bit too well. You know, the whole Burt Reynolds thing with the moustache and the hairy chest? I was in jr. high school when "Smokey and the Bandit" came out and I thought he was totally hot. Have times changed! I am not crazy about too much facial hair (or chest hair, for that matter) ... it's too painful and kind of ticklish at the same time. It's difficult to kiss. Of course ... I don't know what it would be like for a man to kiss a man with all that hair. Can any of you enlighten me?  ::)

Diane - I remember Smokey and the Bandit too. I was a sophmore in high school. They sold posters of Burt Reynolds everywhere after that movie was released. I know this for a fact because I bought a bunch of them! Yes, he was certainly considered a sex god back then. I still think a moustache looks good on a guy; just as long as I don't have to kiss it. They tickle my face too much! ;)
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline dly64

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #27 on: June 28, 2006, 09:24:52 am »
I still think a moustache looks good on a guy; just as long as I don't have to kiss it. They tickle my face too much! ;)

Good to know I'm not the only one who thinks moustaches are ticklish.
Diane

"We're supposed to guard the sheep, not eat 'em."

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #28 on: June 29, 2006, 02:47:05 am »
Good to know I'm not the only one who thinks moustaches are ticklish.

Nope! You're certainly not the only one. :D

It's embarrassing too. I hate it when I have to sneeze as I am kissing someone with a moustache. :P
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline Sheyne

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 960
  • I am pretty good with a canoe tho..
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #29 on: June 29, 2006, 03:30:34 am »

Gotta say, I'm not a fan of facial hair, period. I don't like the look or the feel.

Nup, not even on Jake G..

*ducks avalanches of rotten tomatoes*
Chut up!

Offline dly64

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 708
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #30 on: June 29, 2006, 08:44:37 pm »
Gotta say, I'm not a fan of facial hair, period. I don't like the look or the feel.

Nup, not even on Jake G..

*ducks avalanches of rotten tomatoes*

Ditto! I have to say, however, Jake's sruffy look he's got going (outside of BBM) is rather sexy. I suppose if I had the opportunity to kiss his face, I wouldn't complain. I think I could put up with the ticklishness at least once!  ::)
Diane

"We're supposed to guard the sheep, not eat 'em."

Offline Rayn

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
  • I'm also on FaceBook under Rayn Roberts
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #31 on: July 09, 2006, 01:26:08 pm »
Jake sure did look good playing Jack. :)

Jake is awesome! Both Keith and Jake are.... They'd make the most heavenly "sandwich" with me as bacon, lettuce and tomato in the middle!!!  LOL   Facial hair or no, you'd not hear me complain for an instant...   ;D   And if you're wondering how one man could be bacon, lettuce and tomato at one time...  I could be and do a whole lot more for date with either of our Brokeback heroes!  Yes, sirrreee.   ::)

Rayn


Offline Impish

  • BetterMost Supporter
  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 453
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #32 on: July 09, 2006, 07:36:59 pm »


I reduced the beard you see in my pic to a short goatee and connected 'stache, and asked her to set the length for my sideburns.

She left them longer that I was expecting, telling me that moustaches and long sideburns are coming back, and the national trend is directly attributed to Jake's look in Brokeback Mountain. 

Pretty cool, huh?  BBM also brought the western jeans look back into fashion...  so the movie is affecting even those who never saw it, whether they know it or not!

I can't wait to encounter a gay-hater sporting a moustache and long sideburns and being able to tell him who he is imitating!   :laugh:
Quote
If you won't pray in my school, I won't think in your church.

Offline Artiste

  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,998
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #33 on: October 21, 2008, 10:08:37 pm »
Absolutely, for some !

Offline Artiste

  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,998
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2008, 10:44:06 am »
J'aime surtout les hommes avec des moutaches !

Et toi ?

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,761
Re: Is it back???? Time again for moustaches?
« Reply #35 on: October 22, 2008, 04:34:49 pm »
J'aime surtout les hommes avec des moutaches !

Et toi ?

J'aime rien d'hommes avec des moutaches! Mais ...

I just saw some young celebrity wearing one like it was perfectly fashionable. And then there's Earl in My Name is Earl. Could be a trend.

Fun looking back on this old thread!