Author Topic: Resurrecting the Movies thread...  (Read 1036934 times)

Offline serious crayons

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,757
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2020 on: August 25, 2013, 11:01:39 am »
I'm with you on happy endings, x-man. I often see movies as a form of escape. With rare exceptions (BBM obviously being one), I don't want to finish the movie feeling worse than I did when I started.


Offline x-man

  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 318
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2021 on: August 25, 2013, 04:13:15 pm »
Excuse me, everyone.  On my posting above I was confusing Undertow with Bent.
Happiness is the lasting pleasure of the mind grasping the intelligible order of reality.      --Leibniz

Offline oilgun

  • BetterMost 1000+ Posts Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,564
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2022 on: August 25, 2013, 05:33:15 pm »

[...]

Next time I want to tell you about Strapped (TLA Releasing 2010), perhaps the best gay film I have seen.

 

Interesting.  I didn't care for Strapped.  I'm not sure why but it just didn't move me and the characters didn't seem believable to me.

As for happy endings, they are often overrated, some of the best films I've seen, gay or otherwise, have tragic and depressing endings.

Offline serious crayons

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,757
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2023 on: August 25, 2013, 06:50:49 pm »
I distinguish between movies that are "sad" and movies that are "depressing." The former includes BBM, for example, and I'm often fine with them.

The latter includes Leaving Las Vegas, Platoon, both Elephant Man and Blue Velvet, that one with Sean Penn and Michael J. Fox in Vietnam, the one where Nick Nolte lives in a small town, and Requiem for a Dream. All of the latter (arguable exception: Platoon) are well-crafted, well-acted movies. But I was sorry for having seen all of them. Now, if I suspect a movie is going to be depressing, even if it gets glowing reviews, I avoid it. If I think it will contain a scene set to Barber's "Adagio for Strings," I avoid it. Direction by David Lynch, needless to say, is a red flag.

I'd rather see a light comedy any day, even if it gets worse reviews.

Maybe my own emotional stability is too fragile to mess with.  :-\




Offline brianr

  • BetterMost 1000+ Posts Club
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,813
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2024 on: August 26, 2013, 01:27:16 am »
I guess a lot of the movies I see are sad as I often have to sit through the credits with tears trickling down my face trying to compose myself. Brokeback was over the top. The first time I had tears streaming down my face for about half an hour in the nearby food court, very embarrassing for a (then) 61 year old male. ;D
I rarely discuss movies here as we get them so much later than the US. However I rate movies on IMDB and my list shows I gave 10 to BBM naturally and

A Very Long Engagement
Les Miserables
The King's Speech
Young Victoria
and 9 to
My Afternoons with Marguerite
Mao's Last Dancer
Patrik Age 1.5 (a swedish gay movie)
Ladies in Lavender (surprised I did not give it 10 as I have seen it twice and would do so again)
The Last station
December Boys
I've loved you so long (nearly equalled BBM in the tears it produced)
The Help
Milk
Chocolat
Doubt

So you an see I like sad movies :)


Offline Front-Ranger

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 30,326
  • Brokeback got us good.
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2025 on: October 11, 2013, 10:24:31 am »
I saw Hunger Games before I left for Italy.

I liked the premise (Sorta tone-downed Battle Royale) and the books were extremely popular.  I haven't read them yet. 

I give it 7 out of 10 in that the premise is good, acting pretty solid by supporting cast, though the main characters aren't given much acting to do as reacting.

I enjoyed it and it was disturbing.  I am told the books are even more disturbing.

Sequels are set to start filming this summer.
I watched this last night and found it engrossing. Although it seemed like each step in the action was drawn out a little too long. I'm very impressed with Jennifer Lawrence. I hear Josh Harkness, the costar, bought Heath Ledger's "treehouse."
"chewing gum and duct tape"

Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,186
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2026 on: October 11, 2013, 12:58:38 pm »
On my recent ramble I finally  ::) got to see Latter Days.

Kind of interesting to see Joseph Gordon-Levit (I didn't know he was in it) before he started to become such a Big Deal, and also Rob McElhenny, before he "made it" with It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia (I didn't know he was in it, either).

BTW, it is not always sunny in Philadelphia. ...  ;D
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.

Offline delalluvia

  • BetterMost 5000+ Posts Club
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,289
  • "Truth is an iron bride"
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2027 on: October 12, 2013, 02:19:56 pm »
For previous discussions

I will watch a movie that is sad if I find something in it to identify with or find the topic engrossing.  Otherwise, it's difficult to sit through.  Those that Crayons mentioned along with

Amistad - I had to leave the theater to stop from throwing up.  But I did go back in and finish watching it.
Gallipoli - you need a strong drink after this movie
Romeo and Juliet/Hamlet/other tragedies in literature - you know it's going to end badly
Black Hawk Down - sense of futility
Agora - sense of frustration and fear
Schindlers List and Valkyrie - enough said
BBM of course


I really want to go see 12 years a slave when it opens, but I'm afraid it will be this decade's Amistad for me.

I watched this last night and found it engrossing. Although it seemed like each step in the action was drawn out a little too long. I'm very impressed with Jennifer Lawrence. I hear Josh Harkness, the costar, bought Heath Ledger's "treehouse."

Josh Hutcherson is the co-star, did you mean him?

I am looking forward to the newest one Catching Fire in November, but I know a movie is disturbing to me when I get that sick feeling in my stomach.  I got that - and still get it - when I see The Hunger Games and when I think about the next installment, I get that same sense of "I want to see this...but I don't want to see this..."

Offline delalluvia

  • BetterMost 5000+ Posts Club
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,289
  • "Truth is an iron bride"
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2028 on: October 12, 2013, 03:18:51 pm »
Excuse me if I've reviewed this before, I can't remember if I did or not

2011's The Thing 6.99/10 - when people heard that there was going to be a 'remake' of John Carpenter's 1982 movie The Thing, the fans were up in arms.  JC's movie is now considered a classic, nearly a perfect movie of its genre.  

But the producers pulled a fast one.  It's not a remake.

If you know the 1982 story, you know that the movie starts off with a helicopter chasing a dog into the US Antarctic science base.  The helicopter pilot and his passenger are armed and acting irrationally.  One of the Americans remembers the helicopter having the word "Norge" on the side of it and they realize the helicopter is from the Norwegian science base some miles away.  They investigate the base and the story takes off from there.

2011's The Thing is the story of what happened at that Norwegian base.  It is not as scary as the first movie - I guess because the surprise factor is gone for those who know the 1982 movie.  In a great treat, the actors are mostly all Norwegian.  The producers got the OK to cast the creme de la creme of Norwegian film stars and got them.

There are some liberties taken with some things.  But for the most part, the extras on the movie talk about how they had to do a lot of 'reverse engineering' using the 1982 movie to show how things ended up as they did and they nail it.

Hint:  Stick around for the first part of the credits.

And I've been on a Benedict Cumberbatch kick recently so I've watched the following.  I've also recently bought a DVD/blu ray player that plays region 2 movies so be aware two of these are not available in the US:

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy 8.5/10 - I missed this in theaters when it first came out and finally rented it.  Well worth it.  I ended up buying the movie.  I do like spy movies (they don't all have to be Bond or Bourne) and it got such excellent reviews and I like almost everyone in it.  So I picked a cold, rainy night so I could concentrate on the plot because I heard it was tricky.  But it turned out to be a fairly straightforward tale, the acting by EVERYone is FAR beyond reproach and it was a lot more emotional than it looks from the trailers.  The sexuality of some of the characters, like the morals, is surprisingly fluid in this movie.  But John le Carre gave that his blessing as he says that was quite common.

Third Star 7/10 - movie of a man with terminal cancer taking a trip with his close friends to his favorite wilderness beach in Wales.  I like it because you rarely get to see a movie about friendships between (straight) men that gets so intimate.  They rip each other to shreds emotionally in this movie, are rude, crude and cruel with one another, but also treat one another with great tenderness and love.

Stuart: A life backwards  Based on a true story of an author (Benedict's character) who decides to write a biography of a homeless man (Tom Hardy's character) and the odd friendship they develop.  I need to watch this again before I give it a rating because it wasn't what I was expecting.

First off - culture shock - what is 'homeless' in the UK is apparently not the same as someone considered homeless in the US.  Stuart is considered 'homeless' but he actually does live in government housing and owns a car.  In the US, when you're homeless you are truly homeless, you are living under bridges or in dumpsters or in a box in a back alley somewhere and have nothing.

Secondly, Stuart the character is really bad off - he's ill, a heroin addict and an alcoholic, so he mumbles.  And it is very very difficult to understand what he is saying, so I was stuck concentrating on understanding his words instead of focusing on what he was actually saying and what it meant, so I played catch up the entire movie, lagging behind in meaning and being divorced from the emotions of the story because I wasn't getting most of Stuart's dialogue.

Tom Hardy is spectacular in this role.  I think he either won a BAFTA or was nominated for one and deservedly so, but my goodness, the man can't put two words together in person.

The DVD has extras and interviews with each of the cast and in his interview, Hardy rambles on and on, unable to find the words for what he wants to say.  But he does obviously admire Cumberbatch as a person and an actor, he smiles when he says the man's name and is quite prophetic when he says he knows when someone is an Olympic level actor and Benedict is that.

Hardy apparently really took Benedict to heart.  They worked together again in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and on the red carpet at that premiere, Hardy gave Cumberbatch a very intimate hug that apparently got awkwardly long:

  
« Last Edit: October 13, 2013, 08:06:59 pm by delalluvia »

Offline Front-Ranger

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 30,326
  • Brokeback got us good.
Re: Resurrecting the Movies thread...
« Reply #2029 on: October 12, 2013, 04:03:27 pm »
"chewing gum and duct tape"