Brokeback Mountain: Our Community's Common Bond > Brokeback Mountain Open Forum
Life and this movie are messy
Marge_Innavera:
--- Quote from: ednbarby on February 19, 2007, 11:21:41 am ---Excellent point, Marge. Had I read the story first, I'd have envisioned very different people as those characters. Neither of them would have been handsome, per ce, but they would have had a certain winsomeness that would justify them both being able to marry attractive women and in one case, an attractive woman with a lot of money. I agree that had the filmmakers gone with relative unknowns and been more true to the story in that sense, we first of all would not be here right now having this discussion. Nor would it have gotten any notice from any awards-giving entity except for film festivals and perhaps the Independent Spirit Awards, and thus people would have never talked about it like they have let alone still be talking about it.
--- End quote ---
That's true. It would have been an obscure film that would have changed few, if anyone's lives. But in the eyes of many, it would have retained its moral purity for not being "Hollywoodized." 8)
As much as I liked the story, it did not have the effect on me that the film did. That's no disrespect to the story, but that's how it happened. And I have to wonder if a penniless man who looked like Jack is described in the book could have married into money; it would have been a double whammy. Puts me in mind of the classic WKRP In Cincinnatti exchange between part-time-receptionist-full-time-courtesan Jennifer and a scruffy older man:
SOM: I'm a lot younger than I look!
Jennifer: Are you any richer than you look?
Front-Ranger:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on March 18, 2007, 04:04:07 pm ---Let's talk about guts, shall we? When Jack cuts loose in the rodeo/fuck-ups scene, he says, "I'm spurrin his guts out!" (meaning the horse's) But, sadly, we see a portent of his future fate due to not spurs but a tire iron :'(
And Ennis, for his part, talks of the gut cramps he had after he and Jack parted, thinking he musta ate something bad in DuBois. But instead he had something very very good with de boi and he let it go. :-\ ;)
--- End quote ---
Two other instances where guts are mentioned: At the Siesta Motel, Jack says that his new father-in-law hates his guts. I wonder if the mention of guts reminds Ennis of the grisly sight he saw on the morning after Tent Scene 1, when he left the dogs to babysit the sheep too long. And it's a sure thing that seeing the eviscerated sheep certainly gave him a flash back to the time he was nine years old...
Brown Eyes:
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on April 10, 2008, 08:54:37 pm ---Two other instances where guts are mentioned: At the Siesta Motel, Jack says that his new father-in-law hates his guts. I wonder if the mention of guts reminds Ennis of the grisly sight he saw on the morning after Tent Scene 1, when he left the dogs to babysit the sheep too long. And it's a sure thing that seeing the eviscerated sheep certainly gave him a flash back to the time he was nine years old...
--- End quote ---
Yes, I think there's a big equation made between the mutilated sheep (a victim of "predator loss") after TS1 and Jack and Earl. It's interesting that the language about "guts" exists to such a strong degree in the film and the story too. I'd never noticed that before!
:D
But, I've always thought that an equation was set up between the vulnerable sheep and gay men (i.e. Jack and Earl) in BBM. I think the film tries to visually set this equation between Jack and sheep up through the quick jump between the dead sheep and Jack's naked, shivering body by the stream. And, also things like the nice scene of Jack holding the sheep in his lap trying to get something out of its hoof. Ennis is just sitting in the background watching the flock... which in some way includes Jack here due to his proximity and involvement with the sheep. Anyway, Earl is clearly a victim of "predator loss" (the gang of murderers). And, Ennis believes that this is Jack's fate too. And, the reason that Jack dies is that Ennis wasn't there to protect him (too far away... not looking after his "sheep" properly). Ennis believes himself to be the protector and I think that comes out very clearly in the language used by Proulx to describe Ennis's anger that no one was there to roll Jack over following the attack/accident. I also think that Ennis's feeling of responsibility towards sheep in the sense that he sees himself as the protector... comes in the statement when he says "we're supposed to guard the sheep not eat them."
Front-Ranger:
--- Quote from: atz75 on April 10, 2008, 09:15:00 pm ---an equation was set up between the vulnerable sheep and gay men (i.e. Jack and Earl) in BBM. I think the film tries to visually set this equation between Jack and sheep up through the quick jump between the dead sheep and Jack's naked, shivering body by the stream. And, also things like the nice scene of Jack holding the sheep in his lap trying to get something out of its hoof. Ennis is just sitting in the background watching the flock... which in some way includes Jack here due to his proximity and involvement with the sheep. Anyway, Earl is clearly a victim of "predator loss" (the gang of murderers). And, Ennis believes that this is Jack's fate too. And, the reason that Jack dies is that Ennis wasn't there to protect him (too far away... not looking after his "sheep" properly). Ennis believes himself to be the protector and I think that comes out very clearly in the language used by Proulx to describe Ennis's anger that no one was there to roll Jack over following the attack/accident. I also think that Ennis's feeling of responsibility towards sheep in the sense that he sees himself as the protector... comes in the statement when he says "we're supposed to guard the sheep not eat them."
--- End quote ---
So many insights here, my friend! You are in fine form tonite! I was thinking of the sheep in a rather narrow-minded religious way but you have opened my mind to a new interpretation!
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: atz75 on April 10, 2008, 09:15:00 pm ---But, I've always thought that an equation was set up between the vulnerable sheep and gay men (i.e. Jack and Earl) in BBM. I think the film tries to visually set this equation between Jack and sheep up through the quick jump between the dead sheep and Jack's naked, shivering body by the stream. And, also things like the nice scene of Jack holding the sheep in his lap trying to get something out of its hoof. Ennis is just sitting in the background watching the flock... which in some way includes Jack here due to his proximity and involvement with the sheep. Anyway, Earl is clearly a victim of "predator loss" (the gang of murderers). And, Ennis believes that this is Jack's fate too. And, the reason that Jack dies is that Ennis wasn't there to protect him (too far away... not looking after his "sheep" properly). Ennis believes himself to be the protector and I think that comes out very clearly in the language used by Proulx to describe Ennis's anger that no one was there to roll Jack over following the attack/accident. I also think that Ennis's feeling of responsibility towards sheep in the sense that he sees himself as the protector... comes in the statement when he says "we're supposed to guard the sheep not eat them."
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Front-Ranger on April 10, 2008, 11:54:05 pm ---So many insights here, my friend! You are in fine form tonite! I was thinking of the sheep in a rather narrow-minded religious way but you have opened my mind to a new interpretation!
--- End quote ---
Absolutely, A, a really cool post. And like all great insights, it made me think about the movie in a new way, especially something the line about "bad predator loss."
You know how we think about that trailer scene as being a wedding ceremony, with Aguirre being the preacher/God? Well, it just suddenly occurred to me (as maybe it already had to others) that Aguirre also roughly establishes the form the rest of their lives will take: they'll live separately, on the QT.
They'll get together for a couple of high altitude fucks breakfast and dinner, but they'll sleep with the sheep (pretend to follow society's rules) hunderd percent, no fire, don't leave no sign, roll up that tent every morning case the Forest Service snoops around -- that is, pretend not to be doing what they're doing in case the people on the pavement snoop around.
Maybe this is all obvious to other people, but it's the first time I've thought about the wedding/trailer scene in quite this way. I've concentrated on the certificate (they came together on paper) and the vows (No! No! Not on your fucking life!) and the ring (the watch), and walking down the aisle (the steps) and the kiss (the handshake). But I've never thought of the wedding service in terms as literally as this.
Two years in, and it's still going ... :D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version