Brokeback Mountain: Our Community's Common Bond > Brokeback Mountain Open Forum

The Brokeback Mountain movie purposely did Jack as a whorl? Anniedid not at all?

<< < (8/9) > >>

Monika:

--- Quote from: atz75 on April 07, 2009, 11:17:00 am ---
It may have been out of character and, yes society provided a lot of obstacles to their relationship.  But IMHO, Jack was right.  They could have set up a life together.  They really could have.  I truly believe (more and more so as time as a Brokie passes) that Ennis was very short sighted about ways they could have made things work.
 
Staying apart didn't protect them from anything.  They were miserable and Jack died young anyway.   Nothing about the arrangement they set up based on Ennis's fears "worked."  Jack would have been willing to take the risk(s) that living together might involve.  He wasn't naive, but he was aware enough to realize that living happily... even for a little while... would be preferable to prolonged misery year after year.

Ennis's vision of a "normal" or "conventional" life not only ruined his relationship with Jack but it made a lot of other people miserable (the women who got dragged into this primarily).  Living apart didn't even keep their relationship secret.  By the end there's a long list of characters who know about their relationship (Aguirre, Lureen, Jack's parents, probably Junior had some hint of this...).



--- End quote ---
You´re right in what you´re saying but to me it comes down to what the story is about. To me it´s not a story about a man who is so short-sighted that he destroys the only chance to happiness he has, but a story about how society (and indeed the Wyoming lanscape itself - it´s after all Annie Proulx we´re talking about) shapes its inhabitants. The impact is so strong that even gay people themelves are homophobes. Jack´s and Ennis´s destinies are decided from the get-go and through out the story they follow the paths that have been decided for them.
They are almost puppets on strings. I don´t think it´s Ennis´s vision of a conventional life that destroys his and Jack´s relationship. It´s society´s vision (represented via Ennis) of a convetional life that destroys it.

Shakesthecoffecan:
I thought about this muchly last night, forming a responce in my head, and I think the other posters have more or less reached the same conclusions as I have, but I'll put my 2 cents in :

I think Jack was probably somewhat experienced before he met Ennis. He certainly seemed to know what he wanted. Ennis on the other hand could hardly even admit to himself what he wanted. In their time on the mountain they had the idyllic situation to be close and when confronted with the end of the summer of 1963 it crumbled.

Jack basically had same sex attraction and when he found an opportunity to act on it he did. It is interesting to see the hope in his eyes in the Jimbo scene, it seems he is looking to Jimbo as some kind of stable gratifying situation like he had on the mountain with Ennis. Compare this with the Mexico scene, he is resigned to satisfying the need he has to be with a man, he has given up on affection, love whatever you want to call it and is ready to go off-in the dark to the nasty with a hustler.

And even in the trailhead parking lot, as Ennis drove away from him for the last time, Proulx gives us a rare incite into what he is thinking: the dozy embrace. It satisfied a "sexless hunger" being held by Ennis. He could have built something with someone which was more than sex, but with the restrictions he had on him, the time and place he lived, he took comfort where he could.

The look in Jack's eyes as he watched Ennis ride away, that quiet joy felt when you find a connection with another person. That's the true feeling for me, that and the cut away scene to the trail head parking lot, 20 years later, and his tired face portraying how thing turned out for him. Ennis had accused him of whoring around on him. It is a deep conflict to get the mind around. Ennis' way of demonstrating his love is to threaten to kill him for needing something he hardly ever got. Man, talk about dysfunction.

Monika:

--- Quote from: shakesthecoffeecan on April 07, 2009, 12:30:20 pm ---
The look in Jack's eyes as he watched Ennis ride away, that quiet joy felt when you find a connection with another person. That's the true feeling for me, that and the cut away scene to the trail head parking lot, 20 years later, and his tired face portraying how thing turned out for him.

--- End quote ---
this is always when I start to cry like a baby. Those two shots, one following the other...kills me dead

Brown Eyes:

--- Quote from: Buffymon on April 07, 2009, 12:12:10 pm --- You´re right in what you´re saying but to me it comes down to what the story is about. To me it´s not a story about a man who is so short-sighted that he destroys the only chance to happiness he has, but a story about how society (and indeed the Wyoming lanscape itself - it´s after all Annie Proulx we´re talking about) shapes its inhabitants. The impact is so strong that even gay people themelves are homophobes. Jack´s and Ennis´s destinies are decided from the get-go and through out the story they follow the paths that have been decided for them.
They are almost puppets on strings. I don´t think it´s Ennis´s vision of a conventional life that destroys his and Jack´s relationship. It´s society´s vision (represented via Ennis) of a convetional life that destroys it.


--- End quote ---

I agree with you too.  I think society (and the frequently related cruelty towards indiividuals and unreasonable conventions) plays a huge role in the tragedy that unfolds in BBM.  I certainly don't deny that.  

But, I also don't think Ennis or Jack are puppets on strings.  They each bear some personal and individual responsibility for their actions and decisions.  There is always the opportunity for individuals to rebel or push back against society.

To me it's a balancing act, between looking at what happened in terms of society's pressures and looking at what happened on personal and individual levels for both Ennis and Jack.  To me it's the personal focus that keeps BBM from becoming too polemical or even particularly "political."  



Monika:

--- Quote from: atz75 on April 07, 2009, 12:39:40 pm ---

But, I also don't think Ennis or Jack are puppets on strings.  They each bear some personal and individual responsibility for their actions and decisions.  There is always the opportunity for individuals to rebel or push back against society.




--- End quote ---
I thought this over again, and you might be right. But it does seem to take a lot for them to go against society. Something like being alone together up on a mountain for an entire summer for example.  ;)

But like the trailer said; there are places we can´t return.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version