Brokeback Mountain: Our Community's Common Bond > Brokeback Mountain Open Forum
A Ninth Viewing Observation
TJ:
latjoreme, until very recently, more like in the past few weeks, have members been starting to discuss the differences of the original short story, the "Story to Screenplay" book and the Ang Lee final production of the Movie.
I suggested to Phillip that a major forum area be created to mainly discuss "The Book, The Message & Its Impact;" because Annie Proulx has written in essays, been quoted in print and interviewed in person that many gay men have thanked her for writing the story since it was first published.
If I had never read the story nor even seen any version of the screenplay, I would have a different attitude about how Brokeback Mountain has been presented several different ways to the public.
One reason that I have been claiming that things are my opinion is that some forum members think that I am being hateful when I post something which I believe to be true or have even seen documented elsewhere, in hard copy or on the internet.
Some moderators have told me that I won't be making any friends if I don't tone down my posts. I told Phillip, that so far, I haven't even encountered anyone in the board who even lives within 50 miles of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Even if they did, and they wanted to meet me, they would have to come to Tulsa and even to my home to do that. I don't have personal transportation and local pubic transportation leaves a lot to be desired . . . none on Saturday after 6:00 PM and none on Sunday.
serious crayons:
--- Quote from: TJ on May 15, 2006, 06:25:01 pm ---latjoreme, until very recently, more like in the past few weeks, have members been starting to discuss the differences of the original short story, the "Story to Screenplay" book and the Ang Lee final production of the Movie.
I suggested to Phillip that a major forum area be created to mainly discuss "The Book, The Message & Its Impact;" because Annie Proulx has written in essays, been quoted in print and interviewed in person that many gay men have thanked her for writing the story since it was first published.
If I had never read the story nor even seen any version of the screenplay, I would have a different attitude about how Brokeback Mountain has been presented several different ways to the public.
One reason that I have been claiming that things are my opinion is that some forum members think that I am being hateful when I post something which I believe to be true or have even seen documented elsewhere, in hard copy or on the internet.
Some moderators have told me that I won't be making any friends if I don't tone down my posts. I told Phillip, that so far, I haven't even encountered anyone in the board who even lives within 50 miles of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Even if they did, and they wanted to meet me, they would have to come to Tulsa and even to my home to do that. I don't have personal transportation and local pubic transportation leaves a lot to be desired . . . none on Saturday after 6:00 PM and none on Sunday.
--- End quote ---
TJ, I understand why you might wish to discuss the story specifically, and hope you find a way to do that. (Also, you should check out the Story Ennis vs. Movie Ennis/Story Jack vs. Movie Jack thread, if you haven't already.) But I still don't get why you respond to so many comments about the movie by declaring that this or that scene doesn't exist in the story, or is different in the story.
I know I'm not the first to point out to you that most people here have read the story, in most cases numerous times. We all realize there are differences -- I have seen people comment on those differences for as long as I have been at BetterMost, as well as back on imdb. Many people like to see the movie and story as part of an intertwined whole; others as two distinct works of art.
But when you reply to people's comments about the movie by simply listing all the ways their comments don't apply to the story, it can be off-putting. Maybe this isn't how you mean it, but your posts sometimes read as if you are citing the story as more authoritative or valid than the movie.
JennyC:
I could swear that I posted a message saying that I agree with LJ and RouxB's observation, but it's gone. Did I hit the wrong button, or what?
Anyway I agree that Jack was directing the question “Want to dance?” to LaShawn. I played the scene many times on my computer (partly because Jack looked very sexy in all black :) ) since the same discussion came up on IMDb. I have convinced myself that Jack was indeed talking to LaShawn, he then looked at Randall to seek his consent.
Latjoreme’s comments on parallel scenes are intriguing. Vaguely remembered read the post. I think there are quite a few parallel scenes in the movie, but I don’t know if that theory can be applied to the entire movie in such a structural way (i.e. the opening to the last, the second t the second-to-last, etc.) The few parallel scenes that I am aware of are already covered in Latjoreme’s post. Have to look more closely next time for those subtle parallel scenes.
twistedude:
Jack is--what?--38 years old. Why would he look at a grown man and say ":You wanna dance?"--at a table where 3 people are sitting? Be reasonable. he looks at Lashawn, when he says it, and then at Randall, just before asking his permissiomn.
This is not to say Randall is not checkinfg Jack out, or v.v.
You see: the direction of Jack's look when he says "Wanna dance?" ; he's looking at L:ashawn. Then you see the CAMERA go from Randall to Lashawn--but Jack isn;'t himself looking at Randall...
Brown Eyes:
Hey Friends,
I'm back from a weekend away and I feel like I have sooo much to catch up on around here...
Anyway, I quite like the ink-blot/ symmetrical structure idea. I've never heard it discussed that way before (I must have missed that discussion back on imdb). The starburst pattern on the swing set is an interesting visual suggestion of this. That scene is positioned in an interesting juncture in the film too... it's the first scene we see of Ennis getting on with his average, daily life following the reunion with Jack. So it is like a pivot or a center point to the film. The idea of symmetry reminds me of my old 'bookends' thread back on the old board. There are definitely lots of moments that echo one another, as you pointed out latjoreme. Certain lines of dialogue resonate a few times throughout the movie too(usually with different contexts, tone, etc...). Yes, I don't think the symmetry is meant to be exact or precise either (that would probably feel too forced and artificial). It seems to be the same with other structuring devices like the black and white hats (the way those colors are deployed isn't always consistent).
My favorite symmetrical detail from the beginning to the end are the brown paper bags. :'(
How's this for a subtle bit of symmetry (I know I've posted this someplace else, but it amuses me, so I'll repeat it)... The long grass waving in the breeze outside Ennis's trailer window at the end visually matches a really interesting detail from the very beginning. When Jack pulls up to Aguirre's trailer and gets out to kick his truck and look around there's a moment when we see his profile in relative close-up (he's facing right) and there's a "square" of waving grass in the breeze that is delineated by the upper right corner of the frame of the screen itself and the lines formed by the gravel road and a building. I'm really not imagining this (I don't think)... Once you think about it, it's very noticeable.
cheers!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version