Well, thank God for that. But whether or not it happened before or after the start of the "war on terrorism" makes no difference to my point; that wherever and whenever it happens it's a crime against humanity. (Though it does seem to make much more of an impression on us impressionable Europeans when it's the US, supposed to be the country upholding and defending human rights in the world - going about it as a matter of policy.) I'd be sad to see Jake - or anyone else - invovlved in saying otherwise, however armbiguously.
Seems we're not in agreement on this, and this probably isn't the right place to discuss the current US administration's means and methods - so I'll leave it be now. Time will tell what message the film has on this.
We do agree, I also believe torture is inhuman and a violation of human rights. I just believe that in times of war, horrible decisions are sometimes necessary. Are they pleasant? Something we won't regret? Of course not, we're human. War is inhuman and a crime against humanity, but I am sure there are very few people alive today who would say WWII shouldn't have been fought. How many horrible decisions had to be made? How many innocent people sacrificed for the good of the many?
War is hell.
Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War suspended
habeus corpus and a bunch of other constitutional rights, because we were at war. Did those rights come back as peace broke out? Yes, they did. We Americans just have to be vigilant enough to ensure that they do.
As for Jake, some actors are politically motivated, others are more pure in their wish to be artists. I'm not going to be disappointed in Jake because he took a role that possibly goes against my political beliefs. As Ewan McGregor one time said, "Do we only want to make movies about people we like?"