BetterMost Community Blogs > The Twist Family Bible Study
what do you believe?
Artiste:
??? I am surprised no one describes some islamics as some muslims and so other so-called religions and non-religions: who murder gays, and enslave women as pagans, to-day!!
American First Nations are not pagans!! Some of those who stole their lands and lives, plus livelyhood were and are!!
Many other persons or so-called civilized are pagans as thugs, thiefs and murderers... in my book!
What are your opinions??
I think that there is a God and therefore, I respect life and humans!!
Hugs!!
delalluvia:
--- Quote from: brokeplex on February 19, 2008, 11:46:16 pm ---Just in an interest in knowing what it is you believe, may I ask you exactly how you define pagan. Christians in the later years of the Roman Empire described the followers of the ancient Greco-Roman gods as pagans. I have heard animists described as pagans. The native religions of the American Indian have been described as pagan.
I attend 4 sci-fi conventions in Texas every year, and when I see booths with "pagan" literature or speak with individuals advocating a 'paganism' I always get different answers. I've even spoken to Wiccanists who describe themselves as pagan.
--- End quote ---
A Pagan is defined differently by different people, that's why you get different answers. Some people consider pagans to be anyone who isn't a follower of the 3 great monotheistic religions. Others don't consider Hindu, Buddhist or Native Americans to be in the pagan category, some new age religious people consider the moniker pagan itself to be offensive, since it was used in a derogatory sense by the early Christians. [shrug]
Neo-pagan is just a quickie catchall I use because it refers to a new version of an old religion. My path is more properly called reconstructionism - a new religion based on an old religion constructed out of as much of original material as possible.
brokeplex:
--- Quote from: delalluvia on February 20, 2008, 12:18:48 am ---A Pagan is defined differently by different people, that's why you get different answers. Some people consider pagans to be anyone who isn't a follower of the 3 great monotheistic religions. Others don't consider Hindu, Buddhist or Native Americans to be in the pagan category, some new age religious people consider the moniker pagan itself to be offensive, since it was used in a derogatory sense by the early Christians. [shrug]
Neo-pagan is just a quickie catchall I use because it refers to a new version of an old religion. My path is more properly called reconstructionism - a new religion based on an old religion constructed out of as much of original material as possible.
--- End quote ---
so for you, you have found the part of Christianity that works in your world view and fashioned it to fit your life? sounds reasonable to me, I still consider myself a Baptist but I am happy to ignore interpretations by the SB Conventions which I find intolerable. Why did you feel a need to abandon organized Christianity? you could not mold a niche within a church? or you did not wish to do that? I am just curious as I enjoy reading history, and I read a book last month about the decline of the pagan world in the 4th century AD, so the subject of paganism is on my mind.
delalluvia:
--- Quote from: brokeplex on February 20, 2008, 12:34:00 am ---so for you, you have found the part of Christianity that works in your world view and fashioned it to fit your life? sounds reasonable to me,
--- End quote ---
It is reasonable, many many people do it. But not me. If you read my description to Forsynthia about my Christian beliefs, I couldn't make Christianity work in my life. Religio Romana reconstructionism works very very well for me. I still have a little Wiccan in me because of tradition mostly. The women of my family were either herbalists or curanderas.
--- Quote ---Why did you feel a need to abandon organized Christianity? you could not mold a niche within a church? or you did not wish to do that? I am just curious as I enjoy reading history, and I read a book last month about the decline of the pagan world in the 4th century AD, so the subject of paganism is on my mind.
--- End quote ---
No. I couldn't make it work. In order for me to reconcile Christianity to myself, I basically had to rewrite the entire religion. One ex-boyfriend used to laugh and call it "Delalluvianity". Basic beliefs I couldn't buy, the divorce thing, the 'original sin' thing, the illogic of "the only way to my father is through me" thing, the women are subservient thing, the exclusionary thing, and all the mind control things - I cannot even think nasty thoughts about a handsome guy or have any doubts about Jesus, etc. or else I'm courting damnation - I didn't like some of the things Jesus/Paul/whoever said. It was many things.
brokeplex:
ok I understand,
I guess I am a "cafeteria" Baptist. I have no qualms about picking and choosing the beliefs which are compatible with my conscience and rejecting those that conflict with me. But I understand that many people with sincere religious beliefs can not do this. Some of the doctines and interpretations of scripture creates a conflict in many women, it also creates a conflict with gays.
Maybe it is because in my denomination a doctrine known as the "Priesthood of the Believer" is taught. Essentially that encourages a personal relationship with Christ without passing thru doctrine or ministers. Now, I take this belief a bit further along than most Baptists would. DL who was also raised SB sometimes laughs at my interpretations, but it works for me.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version