Author Topic: Cameras: Film or Digital?  (Read 13765 times)

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #20 on: December 31, 2007, 10:17:52 pm »
That website is wonderful, David!! Very helpful!  :) I've been reading and experimenting. I'll use it some more later. Thank you. I bookmarked it.

You're very welcome!! :D

Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #21 on: December 31, 2007, 10:18:37 pm »
Oops! My company is starting to trickle in! We are throwing a New Year's party! I'll be back later on!!!

Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

injest

  • Guest
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #22 on: December 31, 2007, 10:27:57 pm »
thank you for the site....I saved it to my favorites...

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #23 on: January 01, 2008, 02:35:47 am »
Thanks!  :) I need to read up on it and try different settings. It will even make a little video I think, but I don't know how to do it yet.

Not just little videos, it can make fairly long videos too! And I believe your camera will allow you to do some in camera editing as well. I know my G9 has this feature. If you are curious about the video capabilities of your camera, check out Steve's website. He outlines many of those features. If you need any additional help Shasta, just ask me and I'll do my best to walk you through it.

Those Elph cameras are very nice. Yes, I believe they named them "Elph" because of their size. In other countries they are called "Ixus". The Elph or Ixus cameras were designed to be very user friendly. For those looking for a powerful, high quality camera that can handle any shooting situation with a minimum of fuss should consider a Canon Elph. The camera is feature rich, but also "no fuss".  Just pick it up, aim it, press the shutter and the camera delivers a beautiful, high quality, well color balanced picture.

For those who wish to experiment with things like apertures and shutter speeds should look at the Powershot A series camera (Jess has one) or the Powershot G series (like the one I have). Just like the Elph, the A and G series cameras offer many features, but also allow the user to go in and tweak the settings; although the Elph cameras also allow some room for experimentation. I'm not sure if the Elph will let you manually adjust things like the aperture and shutter though.

Have fun with your camera Shasta! It's a good one, and it's very smart too! If you ever want a mini photography lesson, just set your camera to Auto, and try taking pictures in different lighting; dim lighting, bright, cloudy, etc.. and pay attention to the settings your camera is choosing for each of those conditions. Soon you will feel comfortable going in and adjusting some of those settings yourself as you become more and more familiar with your camera! :D

 
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline Shasta542

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost 5000+ Posts Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,999
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #24 on: January 01, 2008, 02:38:49 am »
Quote
If you need any additional help Shasta, just ask me and I'll do my best to walk you through it.

Thanks, bud!!  ;) I won't hesitate!

Hope you and Alex had a great party!
"Gettin' tired of your dumbass missin'!"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #25 on: January 01, 2008, 02:54:48 am »
Thanks!! Yes, we had a nice party. There's still a few people here. Most had designated drivers, and those who didn't rode home in "David's Taxi Service". Between Alex and I, we've been shuttling a few back home and they can pick their cars up in the morning.

Yes, it was fun. Fried chicken, hot dogs, barbeque, snacks and some hooch too! :laugh:

Thanks Shasta!! I hope you had a nice New Year's Eve too! It's hard to believe it is now 2008. Tempus Fugit.

Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline Wishes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Brokeback Got Me Good
  • *****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #26 on: January 02, 2008, 01:21:57 am »
David, I had no idea what I was buying really!  :) I had looked at cameras several times always leaving the store and that day I just told myself "you're not leaving here without a f-ing camera!" It's a DSC-W55, 7.1 megapixels. I'm not sure if that means anything. I basically decided on this camera because it was a Sony and I'm so glad it's easy to use.

Hope you had a very nice New Year!

Offline David In Indy

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,447
  • You've Got Male
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #27 on: January 06, 2008, 11:10:21 pm »
I finally got a digital this past summer. I think in the long run -- digitals will save you money if you take a lot of pictures. I bought a Canon Power Shot SD 1000 Digital Elph. I wonder if it's called "elph" because it's so small?  :P I love it. It was supposed to have such a short lag time. It's not that short. I may not know how to use it to the best of its abilty yet.

That's cool David--you have a photography degree. Any desire for a studio or wedding/graduation business?


Shasta, you said your camera's lag time is not very short. Did you format your memory card after you put it in the camera? If so, did you use the Low Level Format option? If you didn't or if you are not sure, you might go back and try it. A low level format will speed up the reading/recording to the card.

 
Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

Offline Shasta542

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost 5000+ Posts Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,999
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2008, 11:51:43 pm »
Shasta, you said your camera's lag time is not very short. Did you format your memory card after you put it in the camera? If so, did you use the Low Level Format option? If you didn't or if you are not sure, you might go back and try it. A low level format will speed up the reading/recording to the card.

 

No. I didn't do that. I'll have to figure out how to do it.  :) Thanks!
"Gettin' tired of your dumbass missin'!"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Offline Kerry

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • BetterMost 5000+ Posts Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,076
  • ^ In pursuit of Captain Moonlite - 5 Sept 2009
    • Google Profile
Re: Cameras: Film or Digital?
« Reply #29 on: January 07, 2008, 09:03:16 am »
I responded "digital" to the poll. I never was very good with a camera. Actually, that's not the half of it. I was absolutely hopeless! Couldn't even put film in the camera properly, tst!  :-\

And then, a couple of years ago, I heard about foolproof photography with digital cameras.

So I went to the local electronics store near my workplace and had a look at their selection. I'm not proud to admit that I made my selection on looks alone! Pretty shallow of me, hey? I chose the tiniest, cutest, little camera they had! Sorta like choosing a car because you like the colour!

The camera I chose was an Olympus FE-100 with an AF zoom 6.2-17.4mm 1:3.0-5.0 lens (I hope you know what that means, David, 'cause I don't!!).

It is very cute! I love it like I love my mobile phone!   :D

I mainly use it to photograph art work, which it does brilliantly. It also takes very nice people pics and landscape shots. They're not professional quality, but they are certainly an improvement on the shockingly bad results I used to produce with a manual camera.
γνῶθι σεαυτόν