I am not quoting but this is in response to nB's comment about Jack lying...
This is one of the problems and one of the reasons people can so easily get into screaming fights about this story/movie, etc....what exactly is "canon"? I know Louise uses the New Yorker story, but the story published in the Wyoming stories book and the story to screenplay book is different...and not just the addition of the prologue paragraph. (I believe it was Natali, [Opinionista] who actually went through and did a line by line comparison....that document is floating around here somewhere). People tell me (I haven't seen her in person) that Annie has publicly stated that the "Close Range" story is the one she wrote. She was unhappy with the New Yorker edits. So what is canon? The first thing published? The author's vision?
Then a movie gets made and we have more versions...multiple screenplays, plus a story on film. What is a fanfic writer (and reader) to believe? For me, for my story, I guess I took the movie as canon, in that I had Jack admit to Ennis he had never lied to him. I don't think movie!Jack ever did lie (correct me if I am wrong on this). Story!Jack, as nB noted, did. As commented on, that one lie changed many things. In my view, for my story, there were no lies. Of course, there were other issues.
As for Ennis and Ellery...no, no lies. Info not divulgied, yet, yes...but no lies.