Author Topic: Collections - What do you collect?  (Read 277689 times)

Offline southendmd

  • Town Administration
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,904
  • well, I won't
Re: Collections - What do you collect?
« Reply #160 on: Yesterday at 08:24:46 am »
I wonder if anybody collects Hummel figurines anymore. They used to be big.

The answer is a big "NO!"  You can't even give them away.  My mother had a modest collection, and they just sat there during the estate sale.  I literally gave them away to friends' children.  I kept one for sentiment's sake.

Most sell for under $10.  The exception is the nativity set, which can go for $500.

Offline serious crayons

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,482
Re: Collections - What do you collect?
« Reply #161 on: Yesterday at 02:28:35 pm »
I once was asked to write a feature story about Lladro, makers of ceramic figurines that are only about one degree less corny than Hummel. (The children aren't quite as chubby-cheeked.) I can't remember what I wrote, but the reason I was asked to do it was because Lladro was an advertiser!!!

That's about the most unethical thing I ever witnessed in my 45 years in journalism. It happened a few times at the New Orleans Times Picayune (where the Lladro assignment happened) in situations I wasn't involved in but heard about. My first newspaper, in a small town in Minnesota, had a special edition once a year called the "Progress Edition," which included stories about local businesses (i.e., big advertisers). They at least paid us extra to write them, but imagine having to write a long story about a grocery store! (The bigger the company's ad budget, the longer the story, and needless to say the story had to be flattering.) At the Duluth News-Tribune, a freelancer once wrote about how you can sell your own house and avoid paying agents' fees. The local agents were so outraged that the editor wrote a ridiculous apology column.

On the other hand, I never saw even the slightest hint of what many people assume goes on in mainstream media outlets all the time: stories written to advance the owners' political agenda. No editor ever gave such instructions to me, and I never heard anybody else mention having it happen to them -- not even over beers!





Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,670
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: Collections - What do you collect?
« Reply #162 on: Yesterday at 06:20:27 pm »
I wonder if anybody collects Hummel figurines anymore. They used to be big.

Quote
The answer is a big "NO!"  You can't even give them away.  My mother had a modest collection, and they just sat there during the estate sale.  I literally gave them away to friends' children.  I kept one for sentiment's sake.

Most sell for under $10.  The exception is the nativity set, which can go for $500.

I imagine the same thing must apply to Beanie Babies.
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.

Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,670
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: Collections - What do you collect?
« Reply #163 on: Yesterday at 06:35:42 pm »
On the other hand, I never saw even the slightest hint of what many people assume goes on in mainstream media outlets all the time: stories written to advance the owners' political agenda. No editor ever gave such instructions to me, and I never heard anybody else mention having it happen to them -- not even over beers!

OK, I know this isn't a collection topic, but this did make me think about the historical note that it wasn't always the way it was. I think as far back as the 18th century, newspapers did exactly that--advocate one political party or another. I'm thinking that lasted well into the 20th century, and I wonder when the idea took hold that newspapers should be "neutral," not advocate for one side or another.

Papers still get accused of advocating one side or another. (Of course, TV news does it. Think Fox News.) The Letters to the Editor pages of the hometown paper have regularly included letters accusing the editorial board of Liberalism and not publishing conservative points of view--which, of course, is a stupid position because if the editors weren't publishing letters supporting Conservative positions, how are they publishing a letter that accuses them of not publishing letters supporting Conservative positions?
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.