Author Topic: In the New Yorker...  (Read 2979830 times)

Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,973
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3750 on: June 10, 2025, 09:08:03 pm »
The publication date would be, roughly, today, June 9. Yes, I can access it online, but prefer not to.

Being chronically behind in my issues, I haven't gotten to that one yet.

I just started June 2.
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.

Offline serious crayons

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,617
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3751 on: June 14, 2025, 04:25:11 pm »
I feel like I haven't gotten one in a long time. My subscription isn't expired, so I was planning to call them Monday.


Offline Front-Ranger

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,414
  • Brokeback got us good.
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3752 on: June 15, 2025, 02:01:38 pm »
I still am missing the June 9th issue but I did receive the June 16th issue and have read it already.
"chewing gum and duct tape"

Offline Front-Ranger

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,414
  • Brokeback got us good.
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3753 on: June 17, 2025, 10:34:09 am »
Did you find out anything, Serious? From the preview email I get, it looks like this week's issue might be a good one.
"chewing gum and duct tape"

Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,973
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3754 on: June 17, 2025, 05:37:00 pm »
I still am missing the June 9th issue but I did receive the June 16th issue and have read it already.

I'm reading the June 9 issue now. I enjoyed the article about the conflict over Nutella. I'm reading the Amelia Earhart article now; so far it's pretty good.

That's as far as I've got.
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.

Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,973
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3755 on: June 19, 2025, 05:23:58 pm »
I am currently reading the Curtis Yarvin profile in the June 9 issue, and I'm finding it absolutely chilling.

It's hard to describe what this person believes and stands for, other than the complete destruction of the political and governmental order as we know it--some of which DOGE has already done.

The extremely chilling part is that this man approves of the writings of a retired economics professor from UNLV named Hans-Hermann Hoppe, who believes that universal suffrage should be replaced by rule by what he calls a "natural elite" and calls for "communists, homosexuals, and others who oppose this rigid social structure to be 'physically removed.'"

We all can guess exactly what he means by "physically removed."

Call me an alarmist, but I can see it coming. I've said time and again that once they get tired of rounding up and deporting undocumented immigrants, they're going to turn on gay people (they're already doing it to trans people). They will trot out the old lies that we're child molesters and "groomers" and deviants and encourage violence against us and eventually start rounding us up; look what happened to the Japanese Americans during World War II, except I don't think they'll stop at just interning us.

Really, this is figuring into my attempt to decide whether it would be better (safer?) to stay in a historically well-identified "gayborhood" or keep the house and try to live quietly in a dispersed community where there is no identifiable "gayborhood."

When they start rounding us up or at least charging us with spurious crimes, I'm going to get a lot of the best scotch I can and all the pills I can.
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.

Offline serious crayons

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,617
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3756 on: Yesterday at 02:09:58 pm »
Did you find out anything, Serious? From the preview email I get, it looks like this week's issue might be a good one.

Yes, thanks for asking! They're supposedly fixing whatever went wrong with my subscription, hopefully immediately, and will extend it by the number of missing issues, but said they can't promise to send me the old issues, because they don't always have adequate supply, I guess. I can still access them online, of course, so I should go through this thread and see what people have commented on that I'd really like to read. Anything stand out in your memory as a must-read?



Offline serious crayons

  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,617
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3757 on: Yesterday at 02:32:38 pm »
Call me an alarmist, but I can see it coming. I've said time and again that once they get tired of rounding up and deporting undocumented immigrants, they're going to turn on gay people (they're already doing it to trans people). They will trot out the old lies that we're child molesters and "groomers" and deviants and encourage violence against us and eventually start rounding us up; look what happened to the Japanese Americans during World War II, except I don't think they'll stop at just interning us.

Well, I'm probably a bit naive and I realize these things aren't always unpredictable -- I think the ruthless stuff ICE is doing is surprising even MAGA types -- but so far I don't see huge red flags for gay people. Trans people, of course, are a different thing. I think people find transgenderism confusing and icky and nonscientific and threatening and possibly fake and all kinds of other things. But I feel like they're much better at accepting gay people because they can relate to them in most ways. Gay people want to marry the ones they love, for instance, and straight people can understand that desire. I haven't heard anyone say anything overtly homophobic for a long time (if you don't count the fuss about drag queens and "grooming," which I suppose you probably should count).

I realize that when we started talking 20 years go (!!! I still can't get over that number), marriage equality, which wasn't even being widely called marriage equality yet, seemed extremely unlikely. And Matthew Shepard had been murdered just a few years before. And I live in a partisan bubble, of course, both socially and geographically. But nowadays I see same-sex marriage, for example, becoming so mainstreamed that average centrist people kind of casually accept it, even if they don't share it.

A guy I work with at the paper just became a columnist. He's smart and likable and knowledgeable and I think readers will probably enjoy his columns. A lot of them are about local government and things like that. In the one I just read, he casually mentions his husband. I'm sure lots of people -- myself included, tbh -- may pause over that and think about how shocking that simple offhand statement would have been throughout much of their lifetimes. But those people are, well, dying out, and in their place are young people who think nothing of homosexuality and are even pretty pro-trans and nonbinary (again, I'm basing this on what I've seen living in very blue city and not super red state, but it includes my experience a few years ago visiting a high school in a bland suburb for a story about a theater production and having *all but one* of the five or so students the teacher gathered for me to talk to identifying as they/them, or he/him when they did not look biologically male). So who knows. Trump did not win in a landslide, despite what his supporters like to think/say. That said, though, he and Stephen Miller are using terrifying policies in attempts to suppress choices they don't like and keep Americans for objecting to them. Today's scare was seeing a reference to their sending military to Los Angeles, "the first of the blue cities" where supposedly they will try to do the same.



Offline Jeff Wrangler

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,973
  • "He somebody you cowboy'd with?"
Re: In the New Yorker...
« Reply #3758 on: Yesterday at 06:29:00 pm »
Nevertheless, as far as same-sex marriage goes, the Fundies have Obergefell in their sights, and with the current make-up of SCOTUS. ... The odious CT has already said that decision should be revisited.
"It is required of every man that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellow-men, and travel far and wide."--Charles Dickens.