The World Beyond BetterMost > Women Today
Woman decides full-time mothering isn't for her
Marge_Innavera:
--- Quote from: Kelda on March 08, 2011, 12:38:08 pm ---I already said that..
--- End quote ---
Thank you for sharing.
Brown Eyes:
Yeah, it's what I was trying to say in my earlier post... that there can be and probably are selfish motivations in both scenarios... having children and not having children. There are infinite individual nuances, but neither one is free from the taint of "selfishness". But, IMO looking out for one's own personal best interest should not necessarily be met with disdain either (as long as it isn't hurting someone else).
--- Quote from: atz75 on March 08, 2011, 08:21:54 pm ---I think this question of selfishness is interesting. This word has come up in a variety of ways here... pertaining to both men and women and also apparently to the decision not to have children.
There are clearly a lot of people who have no interest in having or raising children for a variety of reasons. And, maybe in some cases the reasons are selfish. Maybe some people just have no interest in it. Maybe some people don't feel it's the best idea to perpetuate the human race. Etc. Or, maybe some people are self-aware enough to know that they wouldn't be a great parent and are, in an unselfish way, not having children to spare a child from being dragged into a situation like that.
But, I think it can also be said that many people who do have children are also doing it for selfish reasons. Reasons that have little to do with the child itself... They may want an heir. They may want to pass on their genes (I had a friend in college who was strangely obsessed with this idea), they may want someone to love them (the parents), they may want to have children so that someone will feel compelled to take care of them when they are elderly. They may have children because they want to feel fulfilled. And, maybe some people want to have children to further some kind of theological/religiously felf mission. IMO, none of the things I just listed are centered on the interests of the actual child. There are tons of reasons to have children that are centered on the parent's ego and the parent's personal desired.
--- End quote ---
delalluvia:
--- Quote from: crayonlicious on March 08, 2011, 10:45:33 pm ---
But I haven't read the original article yet. Are we talking about a mother who wants nothing to do with her kids? That's problematic. Or is this a mother who simply doesn't want live-in custody of them -- which is a totally different thing? I've written about mothers in the latter situation. Most of them make the decision for their kids' sake. Some regret it; some don't. But it's very hard on them because they're so harshly judged for something that fathers do all the time.
--- End quote ---
Hi crayon. She just didn't want full custody. And she did it for her own sake. She apparently couldn't function as the person she wanted to be if she had to be a full-time mom at the same time.
--- Quote ---And I agree with Katherine's comment that the selfishness can work both ways. Selfish people who want children, for whatever reasons they may want them, rarely if ever let that stand in their way. Why should it? Or to put it another way, 'I'd love to have children but I'm so selfish I'm making an unselfish decision' wouldn't exactly make sense.
--- End quote ---
I've seen this quite a bit. I work where I can read reports on families with children who have genetic problems. These children suffer horribly, will probably die before they're adults and the doctors simply shake their heads - outside from where the parents can see them, of course - and wonder why these people continue to have children even though they know the risks to their offspring. Because you see, if you cast any kind of aspersion on someone's desire to have children - no matter how misguided their reasons will be - you will likely get verbally stoned by society.
They love children! It's an inalienable right! How dare you criticize them for having children?!?! And the kids suffer and suffer and suffer and I cannot imagine why these parents can't be locked up for child abuse.
People continue to have children even when they cannot feed their children because it's a mark of their manhood or womanhood. And they'd rather sacrifice the children they have - their lives sometimes - than go against their status in their society.
I find myself thinking that whenever I see those "Save the Children" commercials. You see this tiny child living in appalling conditions and I wonder why her mother and father even thought to bring a child into their world.
louisev:
As a female who has raised other people's children, I have had the responsibility of parenthood without the dubious 'benefit' of passing on my mutant diseased genes... I never wanted to have children, and have been treated as some sort of freak for not doing it, that is for sure, regardless of my step-parenthood and foster parenthood - those just don't 'count'.
milomorris:
--- Quote from: Buffymon on March 08, 2011, 09:08:50 pm --- I believe she means the work women do at home. Clean, wash etc
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: delalluvia on March 08, 2011, 09:38:11 pm ---Yep.
--- End quote ---
But nobody gets a paycheck for work-product that is consumerd only by themselves and their own families. If that were the case, men would be paid for fixing the roofs of their own homes, caulking their own windows, changing their own oil, etc.
Makes no sense.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version