Author Topic: TOTW 12/07:Is Brokeback Mountain a 'universal love story' or a 'gay love story'?  (Read 18944 times)

Offline Brown Eyes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,377

Well, I at least commend the BBM marketers for not hiding or diminishing the gay aspect of the love story in the marketing.  I'm hugely happy that the main poster featured Ennis and Jack in that intimate composition.  And, I remember some of my first awareness of BBM (through previews, etc.) involved the image of the dozy embrace.  I remember being sort of mesmerized by the image of that embrace and thinking that there was something really powerful and different about how that encounter was shot and presented even in the preview (all this aside from the fact that the image was of a gay couple).

I really don't know how the marketing impacted or didn't impact the audience.  I think the good word-of-mouth did huge wonders for the reception of BBM.

the world was asleep to our latent fuss - bowie

Offline Ellemeno

  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,367
The phrasing of the question reminds me of Stephen Colbert when he says, "George Bush - great president, or the greatest president?"

Maybe BBM is an "I ain't queer" love story.  :(

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,712
I'm always surprised that this question creates what almost seems like tension between people who all love the movie. I remember once on imdb, early on, a similar discussion in which (mostly) straight people were saying it's a universal love story, and (mostly) gay people were saying it's a gay love story. A gay man said something to the effect of, "Come on, it's the first big love-story movie we've ever had, don't try to take it from us," and I said, "No fair! You got the best one!" and he said, "He he he."

Personally, and not to cop out on this, I think it's both. It's a gay love story because Jack and Ennis are gay, and what leads to their tragedy is homophobia. It's a universal love story because anyone with a heart, gay or straight, can relate. So clearly, it's not "only" either thing.

I've always wondered about what it must have been like for gay people through all those decades (and, for the most part, even now), limited mainly to watching movies that focus on straight couples. How hard is it to relate to those movies? To the extent that you do, do you consider them "straight love stories" or "universal love stories"? I've always assumed -- or at least hoped, for the sake of gay friends -- that the emotions of romance and love are universal enough that a well-done movie pushes the right buttons, regardless of orientation or gender. Or maybe it requires a leap of imagination. I don't know.

But I felt -- or at least hoped -- that I got a taste of that experience with Brokeback Mountain. I'm not one of those straight women who's always had a particular interest in romances involving gay men. To the extent they had crossed my mind at all, I assumed I wouldn't be interested because, well, what was in it for me?? Brokeback Mountain took me completely by surprise, and although I find the love scenes erotic I believe my reaction to the movie was less because of slash or homoeroticism than because, well, it's just simply the greatest love story ever.



 



Offline Ellemeno

  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,367
Look what I just found in the Ang Ang Ang thread.  Ang answers this very question, his way:

Question: Do you see them [Wedding Banquet and Brokeback Mountain] as gay films?

Ang Lee: That's a hard question to answer. I do what's truthful to my feelings. I brought some universal feelings, whether you're gay or straight, about love, Chinese family drama, about romance. I think I brought a lot of universality that help the two communities. It's a good gay film for people because it's in the middle of the road. I don't squeeze the characters into gay cinema. I think that's what's good...or not so good. I always try my best when I do a film that feels genuine to me. I put myself in the middle to try to make cinema work.

http://bettermost.net/forum/index.php/topic,13565.msg265475.html#msg265475

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,712
You know, I have nothing but huge respect for Ang. But I'm always surprised that someone who is, let's say, not the most articulate person, at least when speaking in English, can make movies about British or American culture that are so subtle and nuanced and so minutely, carefully, perfectly detailed ... in English.



Offline Brown Eyes

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,377
I still am trying to figure out exactly what "universal" love really means.  It just seems too general of a term to me.  I don't know how we can know what kind of emotion or experience is truly universal.

I started thinking about this "universal" question a little bit while responding to the "Is BBM anti-gay" thread here in Open Forum.  And, I started to wonder about how the audiences of the film tend to feel in terms of identification with characters in the movie.  The whole question of how an audience member identifies with the protagonist/ main characters in any film is a major, major issue within film studies.  And,  I think one thing that the filmmakers of BBM are very, very successful in doing is finding ways for the audience member (regardless of gender or sexuality) to identify with the two main characters and really begin to experience the situation through their eyes a bit.  And, then I sort of wonder, if this ability of a general audience member (or more specifically any audience member who isn't a gay man) to identify with the social position of closeted gay men might then translate into this idea of "universal" love.  In other words, the general audience member/non-gay-male audience member then experiences the love between Ennis and Jack as something that they too can completely identify with... and therefore the emotion is articulated as "universal" as a way of explaining this phenomenon.

Does this make any sense?  Anyway, I think the whole question of how audiences identify with Ennis or Jack (or both) through the course of the film is really important to this issue of how the love story is perceived.

the world was asleep to our latent fuss - bowie

Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,712
I wanted to link and quote Daniel Mendelsohn's famous piece in The New York Review of Books, complaining about the phenomenon of people calling it a "universal love story." Turns out you have to buy the article to see it online. But here's a paragraph about it:

(Mendelsohn) argued that to see it as a story of “universal human emotions” is to diminish its importance as a “specifically gay tragedy” about “psyches scarred from the very first stirrings of an erotic desire which the world around them… represents as unhealthy, hateful and deadly.”

So I think another factor is whether you see BBM as a love story or a psychological drama/tragedy about homophobia. Personally, I thought Mendelsohn's interpretation was too limiting.


Offline Garry_LH

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,245
Not much I can really ad to this discussion... Other than my road killing a few things I mentioned not long after I first time saw Master Lee's interpretation of Annie Proulx's words.

Missouri is not Wyoming, but there is something so familure about the world Jack and Ennis exist within, that I know most of the characters in this film as though they were my own relatives.  The way of speaking, that cadence, that bravado couched in terms as polite as a good horse, and as dangerous as a rattle snake. These characters are ten years older than I am. Then, I remember the world they grew up in. It had it's good points, just as it sure had it's bad ones.

I guess what I can say is, for the first time in my life I have a film in which I don't have to transpose the love the characters have for one another. I don't even have to think about their way of speaking. I grew up with our own rural northern Missouri version of these two good oll boys. And the real hard part, I dam well knew the fear Ennis had of what would happen if anyone else found out. I think for a lot of us older gay folks, that is a whole lot of what kicks us in the gut with this story. It's like Jack and Ennis are two parts of our own soul. The dreamer that can always see the possibilities in life, and the realist that knows just how fast this world can kill you if you make the wrong move.

A universal love story?  Perhaps mixed race couples of that same period would understand why that feels like a bit of stretch for those of us that ended up with this label called gay, and a lot more far less polite terms. Just one more gay tragedy, a friend of mine said. In a way yes, but unlike the plethora of AIDS tragedies and Mathew Shepard remakes, it is the characters themselves that unwind all hope once they leave their piece of  heaven that fall of 1963. A piece of heaven Ennis can never bring himself to name beyond 'this thing'.  Am I the only one that feels a longing in Jake Gyllenhaal's Jack to put his feelings into words. Even as Jack knows, those very words would send Ennis running for his life.

A universal love story?  What other love can so threaten one's own sense of self, can make one question what it is to be a man or a woman, and drive one to deny that what they are feeling is that undefinable madness we call love?  To never speak those words, I love you? If that is universal, this is one scary world we are living in these days.


It could be like this, just like this... always.

Offline louisev

  • BetterMost Supporter!
  • BetterMost Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,107
  • "My guns and amo!! Over my cold dead hands!!"
    • Fiction by Louise Van Hine
for better or worse, it appears Ang Lee struck just the right note in his restrained direction of the film, so that gay viewers could find something of themselves in it, and those who did not directly identify, older straight women, could relate to unrequited love, or love denied, or the road not traveled, to make it a critical as well as a commercial success such as had not happened before.

I was thinking about what you wrote, Amanda, and I think that the identification that people have made with the film becomes universal when they themselves, not being gay or not having been denied the relationship they wanted and needed, are able to understand the frustration, denial, and tragedy in terms of whatever loss they experienced in their own life, and that is their means of identifying.

Some purists have condemned the film as "not being gay enough", or for using very attractive straight male leads instead of gay actors, or for restraining the depictions of sex onscreen, but the fact is that this film may have been only as much as America could handle - and maybe that is something Ang Lee would know more about since he comes from outside the US cultural milieu and has had to learn about it.
“Mr. Coyote always gets me good, boy,”  Ellery said, winking.  “Almost forgot what life was like before I got me my own personal coyote.”


Offline serious crayons

  • Moderator
  • The BetterMost 10,000 Post Club
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,712
I was thinking about what you wrote, Amanda, and I think that the identification that people have made with the film becomes universal when they themselves, not being gay or not having been denied the relationship they wanted and needed, are able to understand the frustration, denial, and tragedy in terms of whatever loss they experienced in their own life, and that is their means of identifying.

Well put, Louise. The very fact that so many straight people (even a few straight men) DO identify with it -- not as just an interesting story or well-made film but as a transcending experience that was moving,  romantic, tragic, etc., on a deeply personal level -- suggests that "universal" is at least one of the terms that accurately desdribes it.