Thank you VERY much for this, sopy.
The following indicates that Vikings were OK with man2man sex as long as homosexual men still behaved like other men in daily life. That's the basics of androphilia.
Homosexuality was not regarded by the Viking peoples as being evil, perverted, innately against the laws of nature or any of the other baggage about the concept that Christian belief has provided Western culture. Rather, it was felt that a man who subjected himself to another in sexual affairs would do the same in other areas, being a follower rather than a leader, and allowing others to do his thinking or fighting for him. Thus, homosexual sex was not what was condemned, but rather the failure to stand for one's self and make one's own decisions, to fight one's own fights, which went directly against the Nordic ethic of self-reliance. (Sørenson 20).
But this was true in most societies where male homosexuality was a normal part of society? That as long as a man was a top, it was fine, but if he were a bottom, then society questioned his manliness however they defined it. Sadly, in most male/male relationships
someone has to bottom at sometime, so that means men tried to stay tops, which limited the bottoms or men willing to bottom and the bottoms were not held in very great respect.