What's interesting there is that there's no equivalent term for a male-oriented escapist movie that focuses on boobs and car chases.
Dick flick.
That's interesting, too. I never thought of "chick flick" as indicating that the movie was trivial or silly, just that its plot dealt with themes or subjects of more interest to women than to men--like relationship stuff, as opposed to car chases and explosions.
I guess either way it stereotypes both the film and the audience.
Maybe both of our reactions to those two terms highlights our personal sensitivities. I'm probably reading the "trivial and silly" part into the term a little bit, because I am all too aware of the phenomenon that girls and women are much more open to seeing movies about boys and men than the reverse. True, women probably aren't as interested in car crashes and explosions. But they are interested in pretty much any other kind of movie whose protagonists are male. Whereas men tend, at least theoretically, to be less interested in movies whose protagonists are female.
There's a lot of discussion of this phenomenon lately in writing about movies, following the success of
Twilight and
Mama Mia. Apparently studio bigwigs have traditionally assumed that women-driven movies won't do well at the box office because men won't see them, but I guess there's been some rethinking of that.
When my brother was here over the holidays, I discovered he likes chick flicks! We went to
It's Complicated, which I'd been lukewarm about but he really wanted to see (it was pretty good after all), and then he and his girlfriend even went to that horrible-sounding one with Sarah Jessica Parker (is it
Did You Hear About the Morgans?), which even I drew the line at. Whereas he doesn't like action, refused to see
Avatar and revealed that he's unfamiliar with Judd Apatow's oeuvre. I found that refreshing (but did urge him to check out some Judd Apatow titles -- movies about relationship stuff, BTW, that are spared the chick-flick label thanks to male protagonists and crude humor).