The in memoriam section was typcial AA attempt to be everything to everybody and end up being nothing to no one. While Heath's rememberance was in the last position as a weak attempt to provide some level of importance, I think that under the circumstances and the recentness of his passing, there was ample, valid reasons to break with tradition and give him a special tribute. He was snubbed only two years ago, will not have the opportunity to receive a life time acheivement award, and now the AA's are over for heath ledger. They had the chance to do the right thing, and failed to do so. Even if they nominate him next year for either of the two films being released in 08, that will be far less a tribute and far too much time will have elapsed to create the type of honor this more timely AA presentation could have been.
And why not mention him by name? Of course, Swank had her lines created for her, but the inuendos and almost riddle-like references to him without naming him was to me offensive. I felt like shouting 'just say it! give him his due.'
I'm sorry, but there are differences, measurements, greater and lesser. The several God-knows-who-are-these-people featured within the same even playing field on which he was 'recognized' was simply inappropriate given the past 6 weeks.
The lack of insight to attitudes and feelings beyond their little clique of self indulgent manipulators will continue the demise of the AA's to the level of Miss America.